Cardiovascular mortality after intensive LDL-Cholesterol lowering: Does baseline LDL-Cholesterol really matter?

It remains controversial whether reductions in cardiovascular mortality after intensive lowering of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) depend on baseline LDL-C levels. To reassess these findings, in this brief report, we performed an updated literature search through February 2020 and selec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Safi U. Khan, Erin D. Michos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-03-01
Series:American Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667720300131
_version_ 1818616369829117952
author Safi U. Khan
Erin D. Michos
author_facet Safi U. Khan
Erin D. Michos
author_sort Safi U. Khan
collection DOAJ
description It remains controversial whether reductions in cardiovascular mortality after intensive lowering of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) depend on baseline LDL-C levels. To reassess these findings, in this brief report, we performed an updated literature search through February 2020 and selected randomized controlled trials which reported cardiovascular mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as outcomes. We included 53 randomized controlled trials (329,897 patients) of LDL-C lowering therapies (statin, ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors) and stratified the meta-analysis according to the baseline LDL-C thresholds. Our meta-analysis found that each 38.7 ​mg/dL (1 ​mmol/L) lowering in LDL-C reduced the risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.81–0.89), but this varied by baseline LDL-C of those in the trials (P ​= ​0.04 for interaction). The risk reduction in cardiovascular mortality was limited to trials with baseline LDL-C of >100 ​mg/dL. In contrast, the reduction in MACE was independent of baseline LDL-C levels. These findings were consistent in primary and secondary prevention settings for both outcomes and by sex for MACE. Our results support the professional cholesterol guidelines which recommend achieving a ≥50% reduction in LDL-C from baseline for high-risk patients.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T16:48:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-546bd800a37141d4bb067edcd2bea931
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-6677
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T16:48:43Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series American Journal of Preventive Cardiology
spelling doaj.art-546bd800a37141d4bb067edcd2bea9312022-12-21T22:24:06ZengElsevierAmerican Journal of Preventive Cardiology2666-66772020-03-011100013Cardiovascular mortality after intensive LDL-Cholesterol lowering: Does baseline LDL-Cholesterol really matter?Safi U. Khan0Erin D. Michos1Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USAThe Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Corresponding author. Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Blalock 524-B, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.,It remains controversial whether reductions in cardiovascular mortality after intensive lowering of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) depend on baseline LDL-C levels. To reassess these findings, in this brief report, we performed an updated literature search through February 2020 and selected randomized controlled trials which reported cardiovascular mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as outcomes. We included 53 randomized controlled trials (329,897 patients) of LDL-C lowering therapies (statin, ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors) and stratified the meta-analysis according to the baseline LDL-C thresholds. Our meta-analysis found that each 38.7 ​mg/dL (1 ​mmol/L) lowering in LDL-C reduced the risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.81–0.89), but this varied by baseline LDL-C of those in the trials (P ​= ​0.04 for interaction). The risk reduction in cardiovascular mortality was limited to trials with baseline LDL-C of >100 ​mg/dL. In contrast, the reduction in MACE was independent of baseline LDL-C levels. These findings were consistent in primary and secondary prevention settings for both outcomes and by sex for MACE. Our results support the professional cholesterol guidelines which recommend achieving a ≥50% reduction in LDL-C from baseline for high-risk patients.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667720300131LDL CholesterolLipid loweringCardiovascular mortalityMeta-analysis
spellingShingle Safi U. Khan
Erin D. Michos
Cardiovascular mortality after intensive LDL-Cholesterol lowering: Does baseline LDL-Cholesterol really matter?
American Journal of Preventive Cardiology
LDL Cholesterol
Lipid lowering
Cardiovascular mortality
Meta-analysis
title Cardiovascular mortality after intensive LDL-Cholesterol lowering: Does baseline LDL-Cholesterol really matter?
title_full Cardiovascular mortality after intensive LDL-Cholesterol lowering: Does baseline LDL-Cholesterol really matter?
title_fullStr Cardiovascular mortality after intensive LDL-Cholesterol lowering: Does baseline LDL-Cholesterol really matter?
title_full_unstemmed Cardiovascular mortality after intensive LDL-Cholesterol lowering: Does baseline LDL-Cholesterol really matter?
title_short Cardiovascular mortality after intensive LDL-Cholesterol lowering: Does baseline LDL-Cholesterol really matter?
title_sort cardiovascular mortality after intensive ldl cholesterol lowering does baseline ldl cholesterol really matter
topic LDL Cholesterol
Lipid lowering
Cardiovascular mortality
Meta-analysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667720300131
work_keys_str_mv AT safiukhan cardiovascularmortalityafterintensiveldlcholesterolloweringdoesbaselineldlcholesterolreallymatter
AT erindmichos cardiovascularmortalityafterintensiveldlcholesterolloweringdoesbaselineldlcholesterolreallymatter