Short Is Beautiful: Dimensionality and Measurement Invariance in Two Length of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction at Work Scale

Self-determination theory proposes that all humans have three intrinsic psychological needs: the needs for Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness. These needs take different forms in different areas of life. The present study examines the psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Basic Psyc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mårten Eriksson, Eva Boman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00965/full
_version_ 1830403439592472576
author Mårten Eriksson
Eva Boman
author_facet Mårten Eriksson
Eva Boman
author_sort Mårten Eriksson
collection DOAJ
description Self-determination theory proposes that all humans have three intrinsic psychological needs: the needs for Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness. These needs take different forms in different areas of life. The present study examines the psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction at Work (BPNS-W) scale. The fit of 10-factor structures previously suggested for related versions of the scale were compared. Cross-sectional data from 1,200 participants were examined in a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Both the original 21-item version and a reduced 12-item version of the BPNS-W were examined. The General Health Questionnaire was used for validation. The results supported a three-factor solution with correlated error variances for the reversed items. Invariance testing of the long and short scales gave best support to the short scale, for which partial scalar invariance was achieved. The external validity of the short scale was supported by a hierarchical regression analysis in which each need made a unique contribution in predicting psychological well-being. In conclusion, the results corroborate a three-factor structure of BPNS-W. Although not perfect the short scale should, it is argued, be preferred over the long version. Directions for the future development of the scale are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T17:09:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-548630cb6e10415e8203c691481d2771
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T17:09:29Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-548630cb6e10415e8203c691481d27712022-12-21T19:32:11ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-06-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.00965364816Short Is Beautiful: Dimensionality and Measurement Invariance in Two Length of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction at Work ScaleMårten ErikssonEva BomanSelf-determination theory proposes that all humans have three intrinsic psychological needs: the needs for Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness. These needs take different forms in different areas of life. The present study examines the psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction at Work (BPNS-W) scale. The fit of 10-factor structures previously suggested for related versions of the scale were compared. Cross-sectional data from 1,200 participants were examined in a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Both the original 21-item version and a reduced 12-item version of the BPNS-W were examined. The General Health Questionnaire was used for validation. The results supported a three-factor solution with correlated error variances for the reversed items. Invariance testing of the long and short scales gave best support to the short scale, for which partial scalar invariance was achieved. The external validity of the short scale was supported by a hierarchical regression analysis in which each need made a unique contribution in predicting psychological well-being. In conclusion, the results corroborate a three-factor structure of BPNS-W. Although not perfect the short scale should, it is argued, be preferred over the long version. Directions for the future development of the scale are discussed.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00965/fullconfirmatory factor analysismeasurement invariancebasic need satisfaction scaleself-determination theorymotivation
spellingShingle Mårten Eriksson
Eva Boman
Short Is Beautiful: Dimensionality and Measurement Invariance in Two Length of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction at Work Scale
Frontiers in Psychology
confirmatory factor analysis
measurement invariance
basic need satisfaction scale
self-determination theory
motivation
title Short Is Beautiful: Dimensionality and Measurement Invariance in Two Length of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction at Work Scale
title_full Short Is Beautiful: Dimensionality and Measurement Invariance in Two Length of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction at Work Scale
title_fullStr Short Is Beautiful: Dimensionality and Measurement Invariance in Two Length of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction at Work Scale
title_full_unstemmed Short Is Beautiful: Dimensionality and Measurement Invariance in Two Length of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction at Work Scale
title_short Short Is Beautiful: Dimensionality and Measurement Invariance in Two Length of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction at Work Scale
title_sort short is beautiful dimensionality and measurement invariance in two length of the basic psychological need satisfaction at work scale
topic confirmatory factor analysis
measurement invariance
basic need satisfaction scale
self-determination theory
motivation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00965/full
work_keys_str_mv AT marteneriksson shortisbeautifuldimensionalityandmeasurementinvarianceintwolengthofthebasicpsychologicalneedsatisfactionatworkscale
AT evaboman shortisbeautifuldimensionalityandmeasurementinvarianceintwolengthofthebasicpsychologicalneedsatisfactionatworkscale