Adaptation of Water Supply to Changing Climate and Land-Use Activities, Case of Ljubljana Water Supply, Slovenia

A risk management methodology is presented for the adaptation of water supply to changing climate and land-use activities, considering socio-economic aspects. Several management options were selected for the case of the public water supply of Ljubljana, the capital of Slovenia. The major management...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barbara Cencur Curk, Branka Bracic Zeleznik, Istvan Bogardi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-01-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/1/288
_version_ 1811337326820851712
author Barbara Cencur Curk
Branka Bracic Zeleznik
Istvan Bogardi
author_facet Barbara Cencur Curk
Branka Bracic Zeleznik
Istvan Bogardi
author_sort Barbara Cencur Curk
collection DOAJ
description A risk management methodology is presented for the adaptation of water supply to changing climate and land-use activities, considering socio-economic aspects. Several management options were selected for the case of the public water supply of Ljubljana, the capital of Slovenia. The major management actions for improving drinking water safety are (1) land-use limitations within the drinking water protection areas and (2) drinking water treatment. Trends in groundwater level are decreasing, above all in the area of well fields; therefore, artificial recharge and setting up a new independent well field were also considered. The management actions were evaluated according to several criteria, such as water supply risk reduction for the various users (drinking, agricultural, and industrial) and realization of the actions (cost, flexibility, and leg time). For management options, the ranking “Fuzzy Decimaker” tool was applied, which is based on a Multiple Criterion Decision Making (MCDM) technique. Ranking of management actions has shown that all management actions are good as they are clustering in the corner close to the ideal value. For a particular well field, farming limitations in the drinking water protection areas are the best and water treatment is the worst management action, which is due to high costs, low flexibility, and longer lag time.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T17:53:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-54902918dc5e465bb1556441ceeb9d3e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4441
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T17:53:13Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Water
spelling doaj.art-54902918dc5e465bb1556441ceeb9d3e2022-12-22T02:36:36ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412020-01-0112128810.3390/w12010288w12010288Adaptation of Water Supply to Changing Climate and Land-Use Activities, Case of Ljubljana Water Supply, SloveniaBarbara Cencur Curk0Branka Bracic Zeleznik1Istvan Bogardi2Department of Geology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaJP VODOVOD KANALIZACIJA SNAGA d.o.o., 1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaDepartment of Meteorology, Eötvös University, 1117 Budapest, HungaryA risk management methodology is presented for the adaptation of water supply to changing climate and land-use activities, considering socio-economic aspects. Several management options were selected for the case of the public water supply of Ljubljana, the capital of Slovenia. The major management actions for improving drinking water safety are (1) land-use limitations within the drinking water protection areas and (2) drinking water treatment. Trends in groundwater level are decreasing, above all in the area of well fields; therefore, artificial recharge and setting up a new independent well field were also considered. The management actions were evaluated according to several criteria, such as water supply risk reduction for the various users (drinking, agricultural, and industrial) and realization of the actions (cost, flexibility, and leg time). For management options, the ranking “Fuzzy Decimaker” tool was applied, which is based on a Multiple Criterion Decision Making (MCDM) technique. Ranking of management actions has shown that all management actions are good as they are clustering in the corner close to the ideal value. For a particular well field, farming limitations in the drinking water protection areas are the best and water treatment is the worst management action, which is due to high costs, low flexibility, and longer lag time.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/1/288climate changeporous aquiferdrinking water supplyadaptation strategies
spellingShingle Barbara Cencur Curk
Branka Bracic Zeleznik
Istvan Bogardi
Adaptation of Water Supply to Changing Climate and Land-Use Activities, Case of Ljubljana Water Supply, Slovenia
Water
climate change
porous aquifer
drinking water supply
adaptation strategies
title Adaptation of Water Supply to Changing Climate and Land-Use Activities, Case of Ljubljana Water Supply, Slovenia
title_full Adaptation of Water Supply to Changing Climate and Land-Use Activities, Case of Ljubljana Water Supply, Slovenia
title_fullStr Adaptation of Water Supply to Changing Climate and Land-Use Activities, Case of Ljubljana Water Supply, Slovenia
title_full_unstemmed Adaptation of Water Supply to Changing Climate and Land-Use Activities, Case of Ljubljana Water Supply, Slovenia
title_short Adaptation of Water Supply to Changing Climate and Land-Use Activities, Case of Ljubljana Water Supply, Slovenia
title_sort adaptation of water supply to changing climate and land use activities case of ljubljana water supply slovenia
topic climate change
porous aquifer
drinking water supply
adaptation strategies
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/1/288
work_keys_str_mv AT barbaracencurcurk adaptationofwatersupplytochangingclimateandlanduseactivitiescaseofljubljanawatersupplyslovenia
AT brankabraciczeleznik adaptationofwatersupplytochangingclimateandlanduseactivitiescaseofljubljanawatersupplyslovenia
AT istvanbogardi adaptationofwatersupplytochangingclimateandlanduseactivitiescaseofljubljanawatersupplyslovenia