Energy Recovery from Residual Municipal Solid Waste: State of the Art and Perspectives within the Challenge to Climate Change

Among the technologies for the recovery of energy from waste, in particular residual municipal solid waste (rMSW), combustion is the most widely used thermo-chemical treatment process associated with thermal and electric power production by a steam cycle, named, shortly, Waste to Energy (WtE). Today...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lidia Lombardi, Marco J. Castaldi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-01-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/2/395
_version_ 1797344144559964160
author Lidia Lombardi
Marco J. Castaldi
author_facet Lidia Lombardi
Marco J. Castaldi
author_sort Lidia Lombardi
collection DOAJ
description Among the technologies for the recovery of energy from waste, in particular residual municipal solid waste (rMSW), combustion is the most widely used thermo-chemical treatment process associated with thermal and electric power production by a steam cycle, named, shortly, Waste to Energy (WtE). Today, more than 500 WtE plants in the EU, about 400 in China and 76 in the USA are in operation, based on efficient technologies and advanced air pollution control systems. Energy recovery can be accomplished also by means of gasification; however, the presence of impurities together with the atmospheric pressure, at which syngas is normally produced, impose the feeding of syngas to a conventional steam cycle, leading to generally lower performances than WtE. The energy recovered by WtE offsets traditional energy sources such as fossil fuels and related emissions, providing savings in term of climate change. However, the savings obtainable by replacing electricity and/or heat will diminish as the energy systems will hopefully become increasingly renewable. Over this medium–long-term horizon, one possibility is to capture the CO<sub>2</sub> from WtE flue gases and to store/use it. From the life cycle assessment perspective, it has been calculated that the introduction of CO<sub>2</sub> capture and storage in WtE, despite energy penalties, is able to reduce the impact on climate change. The alternative approach, proposed to contain the emissions of greenhouse gases in the thermal treatment of waste, is using the carbon contained in it to produce commonly used chemical compounds (waste to chemicals). The benefits, in terms of reductions of greenhouse gases, are expected from the possibility of obtaining chemicals that can replace their analogue normally produced from fossil sources. To date, only one WtC demonstration plant is operating by being fed by rMSW-derived waste, and some similar initiatives are planned, but still adequate assurances in terms of robust knowledge of the involved complex processes, above all, if applied to highly inhomogeneous feed streams such as those obtained from rMSW, are not available. Once the several initiatives come to completion, it will enable waste management professionals to assess performance and to begin to consider such a facility in their planning.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T10:58:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-54920971979742d8b0cec0a006985829
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T10:58:06Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-54920971979742d8b0cec0a0069858292024-01-26T16:18:46ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732024-01-0117239510.3390/en17020395Energy Recovery from Residual Municipal Solid Waste: State of the Art and Perspectives within the Challenge to Climate ChangeLidia Lombardi0Marco J. Castaldi1Department of Engineering, Niccolò Cusano University, 00166 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The City College of New York, City University of New York, New York, NY 10031, USAAmong the technologies for the recovery of energy from waste, in particular residual municipal solid waste (rMSW), combustion is the most widely used thermo-chemical treatment process associated with thermal and electric power production by a steam cycle, named, shortly, Waste to Energy (WtE). Today, more than 500 WtE plants in the EU, about 400 in China and 76 in the USA are in operation, based on efficient technologies and advanced air pollution control systems. Energy recovery can be accomplished also by means of gasification; however, the presence of impurities together with the atmospheric pressure, at which syngas is normally produced, impose the feeding of syngas to a conventional steam cycle, leading to generally lower performances than WtE. The energy recovered by WtE offsets traditional energy sources such as fossil fuels and related emissions, providing savings in term of climate change. However, the savings obtainable by replacing electricity and/or heat will diminish as the energy systems will hopefully become increasingly renewable. Over this medium–long-term horizon, one possibility is to capture the CO<sub>2</sub> from WtE flue gases and to store/use it. From the life cycle assessment perspective, it has been calculated that the introduction of CO<sub>2</sub> capture and storage in WtE, despite energy penalties, is able to reduce the impact on climate change. The alternative approach, proposed to contain the emissions of greenhouse gases in the thermal treatment of waste, is using the carbon contained in it to produce commonly used chemical compounds (waste to chemicals). The benefits, in terms of reductions of greenhouse gases, are expected from the possibility of obtaining chemicals that can replace their analogue normally produced from fossil sources. To date, only one WtC demonstration plant is operating by being fed by rMSW-derived waste, and some similar initiatives are planned, but still adequate assurances in terms of robust knowledge of the involved complex processes, above all, if applied to highly inhomogeneous feed streams such as those obtained from rMSW, are not available. Once the several initiatives come to completion, it will enable waste management professionals to assess performance and to begin to consider such a facility in their planning.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/2/395waste to energygasificationwaste to chemicalscarbon capture and storageCCS
spellingShingle Lidia Lombardi
Marco J. Castaldi
Energy Recovery from Residual Municipal Solid Waste: State of the Art and Perspectives within the Challenge to Climate Change
Energies
waste to energy
gasification
waste to chemicals
carbon capture and storage
CCS
title Energy Recovery from Residual Municipal Solid Waste: State of the Art and Perspectives within the Challenge to Climate Change
title_full Energy Recovery from Residual Municipal Solid Waste: State of the Art and Perspectives within the Challenge to Climate Change
title_fullStr Energy Recovery from Residual Municipal Solid Waste: State of the Art and Perspectives within the Challenge to Climate Change
title_full_unstemmed Energy Recovery from Residual Municipal Solid Waste: State of the Art and Perspectives within the Challenge to Climate Change
title_short Energy Recovery from Residual Municipal Solid Waste: State of the Art and Perspectives within the Challenge to Climate Change
title_sort energy recovery from residual municipal solid waste state of the art and perspectives within the challenge to climate change
topic waste to energy
gasification
waste to chemicals
carbon capture and storage
CCS
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/2/395
work_keys_str_mv AT lidialombardi energyrecoveryfromresidualmunicipalsolidwastestateoftheartandperspectiveswithinthechallengetoclimatechange
AT marcojcastaldi energyrecoveryfromresidualmunicipalsolidwastestateoftheartandperspectiveswithinthechallengetoclimatechange