Training Programs for Fundamental and Clinician-Scientists: Balanced Outcomes for Graduates by Gender

Background: Women scientists are less likely to obtain Assistant Professorship and achieve promotion, and obtain less grant funding than men. Scientist/clinician-scientist training programs which provide salary awards as well as training and mentorship are a potential intervention to improve outcome...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christie Rampersad, Todd Alexander, Elisabeth Fowler, Sunny Hartwig, Adeera Levin, Norman D. Rosenblum, Susan Samuel, Chris Wiebe, Julie Ho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-09-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581211033405
_version_ 1818670270554046464
author Christie Rampersad
Todd Alexander
Elisabeth Fowler
Sunny Hartwig
Adeera Levin
Norman D. Rosenblum
Susan Samuel
Chris Wiebe
Julie Ho
author_facet Christie Rampersad
Todd Alexander
Elisabeth Fowler
Sunny Hartwig
Adeera Levin
Norman D. Rosenblum
Susan Samuel
Chris Wiebe
Julie Ho
author_sort Christie Rampersad
collection DOAJ
description Background: Women scientists are less likely to obtain Assistant Professorship and achieve promotion, and obtain less grant funding than men. Scientist/clinician-scientist training programs which provide salary awards as well as training and mentorship are a potential intervention to improve outcomes among women scientists. We hypothesized whether a programmatic approach to scientist/clinician-scientist training is associated with improved outcomes for women scientists in Canada when compared with salary awards alone. Trainees within the Kidney Research Scientist Core Education and National Training Program (KRESCENT), Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Program (CCHCSP), and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) salary award programs were evaluated. Objective: To examine whether the structured KRESCENT training program with salary support improves academic success for women scientists relative to salary awards alone. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Canadian national research scientist and clinician-scientist training programs and salary awards. Participants: KRESCENT cohort (n = 59, 2005-2017), CCHCSP cohort (n = 58, 2002-2015), and CIHR (n = 571, 2005-2015) Salary Awardees for postdoctoral fellows (PDF) and new investigators (NI). Measurements: National operating grant funding success, achieving an academic position as an Assistant Professor for PDF, or achieving promotion to Associate Professor for NI. Methods: The gender distribution of each cohort was determined using first name and NamepediA and was examined for PDF and NI, followed by a description of trainee outcomes by gender and training level. Results: KRESCENT and CIHR PDF were balanced (12/27, 44% men and 55/116, 47% women) while CCHCSP had a higher proportion of women (13/20, 65%). KRESCENT and CCHCSP NI retained women scientists (19/32, 59% and 22/38, 58% women), whereas CIHR NI had fewer women (165/455, 36% women vs 290/455, 64% men, P = 0.01). There was a high rate of NI operating grant success (91%-95%) with no gender differences in each cohort. There was a high proportion of CCHCSP PDF who achieved an Assistant Professorship (18/20, 90%) that may be due in part to a longer follow-up period (9.3 ± 3 years) compared with KRESCENT PDF (7/27, 26%, 0.88 ± 4.5 years), and these data were not available for CIHR PDF. Women KRESCENT NI showed increased promotion to Associate Professor ( P = 0.02, 0.25 ± 3.2 years follow-up) and CCHCSP NI had high promotion rates (37/38, 97%, 6.9 ± 3.6 years follow-up) irrespective of gender. There was an overall trend toward more men pursuing biomedical research. Limitations: KRESCENT and CCHCSP training program cohort size and heterogeneity; assigning gender by first name may result in misclassification; lack of data on the respective applicant pools; and inability to examine intersectionality with gender, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. Conclusion: Overall trainee performance across programs is remarkable by community standards regardless of gender. KRESCENT and CCHCSP training programs demonstrated balanced success in their PDF and NI, whereas the CIHR awardees had reduced representation of women scientists from PDF to NI. This exploratory study highlights the utility of programmatic training approaches like the KRESCENT program as potential tools to support and retain women scientists in the academic pipeline during the challenging PDF to NI transition period.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T07:05:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-54977b1c9b504bd7a3766613b91b409f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2054-3581
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T07:05:27Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
spelling doaj.art-54977b1c9b504bd7a3766613b91b409f2022-12-21T21:59:11ZengSAGE PublishingCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease2054-35812021-09-01810.1177/20543581211033405Training Programs for Fundamental and Clinician-Scientists: Balanced Outcomes for Graduates by GenderChristie Rampersad0Todd Alexander1Elisabeth Fowler2Sunny Hartwig3Adeera Levin4Norman D. Rosenblum5Susan Samuel6Chris Wiebe7Julie Ho8Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, CanadaDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, CanadaKidney Foundation of Canada, Montreal, QC, CanadaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, CanadaDepartment of Internal Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CanadaDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, ON, CanadaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, AB, CanadaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, CanadaDepartment of Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, CanadaBackground: Women scientists are less likely to obtain Assistant Professorship and achieve promotion, and obtain less grant funding than men. Scientist/clinician-scientist training programs which provide salary awards as well as training and mentorship are a potential intervention to improve outcomes among women scientists. We hypothesized whether a programmatic approach to scientist/clinician-scientist training is associated with improved outcomes for women scientists in Canada when compared with salary awards alone. Trainees within the Kidney Research Scientist Core Education and National Training Program (KRESCENT), Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Program (CCHCSP), and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) salary award programs were evaluated. Objective: To examine whether the structured KRESCENT training program with salary support improves academic success for women scientists relative to salary awards alone. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Canadian national research scientist and clinician-scientist training programs and salary awards. Participants: KRESCENT cohort (n = 59, 2005-2017), CCHCSP cohort (n = 58, 2002-2015), and CIHR (n = 571, 2005-2015) Salary Awardees for postdoctoral fellows (PDF) and new investigators (NI). Measurements: National operating grant funding success, achieving an academic position as an Assistant Professor for PDF, or achieving promotion to Associate Professor for NI. Methods: The gender distribution of each cohort was determined using first name and NamepediA and was examined for PDF and NI, followed by a description of trainee outcomes by gender and training level. Results: KRESCENT and CIHR PDF were balanced (12/27, 44% men and 55/116, 47% women) while CCHCSP had a higher proportion of women (13/20, 65%). KRESCENT and CCHCSP NI retained women scientists (19/32, 59% and 22/38, 58% women), whereas CIHR NI had fewer women (165/455, 36% women vs 290/455, 64% men, P = 0.01). There was a high rate of NI operating grant success (91%-95%) with no gender differences in each cohort. There was a high proportion of CCHCSP PDF who achieved an Assistant Professorship (18/20, 90%) that may be due in part to a longer follow-up period (9.3 ± 3 years) compared with KRESCENT PDF (7/27, 26%, 0.88 ± 4.5 years), and these data were not available for CIHR PDF. Women KRESCENT NI showed increased promotion to Associate Professor ( P = 0.02, 0.25 ± 3.2 years follow-up) and CCHCSP NI had high promotion rates (37/38, 97%, 6.9 ± 3.6 years follow-up) irrespective of gender. There was an overall trend toward more men pursuing biomedical research. Limitations: KRESCENT and CCHCSP training program cohort size and heterogeneity; assigning gender by first name may result in misclassification; lack of data on the respective applicant pools; and inability to examine intersectionality with gender, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. Conclusion: Overall trainee performance across programs is remarkable by community standards regardless of gender. KRESCENT and CCHCSP training programs demonstrated balanced success in their PDF and NI, whereas the CIHR awardees had reduced representation of women scientists from PDF to NI. This exploratory study highlights the utility of programmatic training approaches like the KRESCENT program as potential tools to support and retain women scientists in the academic pipeline during the challenging PDF to NI transition period.https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581211033405
spellingShingle Christie Rampersad
Todd Alexander
Elisabeth Fowler
Sunny Hartwig
Adeera Levin
Norman D. Rosenblum
Susan Samuel
Chris Wiebe
Julie Ho
Training Programs for Fundamental and Clinician-Scientists: Balanced Outcomes for Graduates by Gender
Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
title Training Programs for Fundamental and Clinician-Scientists: Balanced Outcomes for Graduates by Gender
title_full Training Programs for Fundamental and Clinician-Scientists: Balanced Outcomes for Graduates by Gender
title_fullStr Training Programs for Fundamental and Clinician-Scientists: Balanced Outcomes for Graduates by Gender
title_full_unstemmed Training Programs for Fundamental and Clinician-Scientists: Balanced Outcomes for Graduates by Gender
title_short Training Programs for Fundamental and Clinician-Scientists: Balanced Outcomes for Graduates by Gender
title_sort training programs for fundamental and clinician scientists balanced outcomes for graduates by gender
url https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581211033405
work_keys_str_mv AT christierampersad trainingprogramsforfundamentalandclinicianscientistsbalancedoutcomesforgraduatesbygender
AT toddalexander trainingprogramsforfundamentalandclinicianscientistsbalancedoutcomesforgraduatesbygender
AT elisabethfowler trainingprogramsforfundamentalandclinicianscientistsbalancedoutcomesforgraduatesbygender
AT sunnyhartwig trainingprogramsforfundamentalandclinicianscientistsbalancedoutcomesforgraduatesbygender
AT adeeralevin trainingprogramsforfundamentalandclinicianscientistsbalancedoutcomesforgraduatesbygender
AT normandrosenblum trainingprogramsforfundamentalandclinicianscientistsbalancedoutcomesforgraduatesbygender
AT susansamuel trainingprogramsforfundamentalandclinicianscientistsbalancedoutcomesforgraduatesbygender
AT chriswiebe trainingprogramsforfundamentalandclinicianscientistsbalancedoutcomesforgraduatesbygender
AT julieho trainingprogramsforfundamentalandclinicianscientistsbalancedoutcomesforgraduatesbygender