The Role of Gender in Parliamentary Attacks and Incivility

It has been well established that politicians attack their competitors to reach their political goals. As such, there is a considerable amount of literature on their attack behaviour. However, this literature almost exclusively investigates attack behaviour during campaigns, and so far, few studies...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Željko Poljak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2022-12-01
Series:Politics and Governance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5718
_version_ 1797974618338754560
author Željko Poljak
author_facet Željko Poljak
author_sort Željko Poljak
collection DOAJ
description It has been well established that politicians attack their competitors to reach their political goals. As such, there is a considerable amount of literature on their attack behaviour. However, this literature almost exclusively investigates attack behaviour during campaigns, and so far, few studies have addressed the nature of attacks during more routine times in parliaments. This article aims to fill this gap by examining in-parliament attack behaviour and, more specifically, the gender characteristics of attacks. It is theorised that women are less likely to attack and be attacked than men due to the stereotypical gender roles. However, it is anticipated that this compliance to stereotypes diminishes as proximity to elections increases, resulting in women engaging in attacks as much as men. To limit the cost of their divergence, attacks employed by and toward women are expected to be more civil. Lastly, this study argues that adherence to gender stereotypes is stronger in countries with candidate-centred parliamentary systems than party-centred ones. This study finds support for the theoretical framework using longitudinal data on individual attacks in the parliaments of Belgium, Croatia, and the UK. Results confirm that politicians adhere to gender stereotypical roles in parliaments, with women attacking and being targeted less than men, and when women do attack or are targeted, less incivility is employed. Proximity to elections makes both women and men more hostile, but women lower the cost of their increasing attack behaviour by using less incivility, unlike men who increasingly opt for uncivil attacks closer to elections. Additionally, these findings strongly apply in the candidate-centred system of the UK, whereas in the party-centred system of Belgium and Croatia, hardly any support for the theory can be found.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T04:22:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-54a141fd48694b7c9596c91bf98d6e74
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2183-2463
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T04:22:39Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Cogitatio
record_format Article
series Politics and Governance
spelling doaj.art-54a141fd48694b7c9596c91bf98d6e742022-12-30T11:33:51ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632022-12-0110428629810.17645/pag.v10i4.57182674The Role of Gender in Parliamentary Attacks and IncivilityŽeljko Poljak0Department of Political Science, University of Antwerp, BelgiumIt has been well established that politicians attack their competitors to reach their political goals. As such, there is a considerable amount of literature on their attack behaviour. However, this literature almost exclusively investigates attack behaviour during campaigns, and so far, few studies have addressed the nature of attacks during more routine times in parliaments. This article aims to fill this gap by examining in-parliament attack behaviour and, more specifically, the gender characteristics of attacks. It is theorised that women are less likely to attack and be attacked than men due to the stereotypical gender roles. However, it is anticipated that this compliance to stereotypes diminishes as proximity to elections increases, resulting in women engaging in attacks as much as men. To limit the cost of their divergence, attacks employed by and toward women are expected to be more civil. Lastly, this study argues that adherence to gender stereotypes is stronger in countries with candidate-centred parliamentary systems than party-centred ones. This study finds support for the theoretical framework using longitudinal data on individual attacks in the parliaments of Belgium, Croatia, and the UK. Results confirm that politicians adhere to gender stereotypical roles in parliaments, with women attacking and being targeted less than men, and when women do attack or are targeted, less incivility is employed. Proximity to elections makes both women and men more hostile, but women lower the cost of their increasing attack behaviour by using less incivility, unlike men who increasingly opt for uncivil attacks closer to elections. Additionally, these findings strongly apply in the candidate-centred system of the UK, whereas in the party-centred system of Belgium and Croatia, hardly any support for the theory can be found.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5718attacksincivilitygenderparliaments
spellingShingle Željko Poljak
The Role of Gender in Parliamentary Attacks and Incivility
Politics and Governance
attacks
incivility
gender
parliaments
title The Role of Gender in Parliamentary Attacks and Incivility
title_full The Role of Gender in Parliamentary Attacks and Incivility
title_fullStr The Role of Gender in Parliamentary Attacks and Incivility
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Gender in Parliamentary Attacks and Incivility
title_short The Role of Gender in Parliamentary Attacks and Incivility
title_sort role of gender in parliamentary attacks and incivility
topic attacks
incivility
gender
parliaments
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5718
work_keys_str_mv AT zeljkopoljak theroleofgenderinparliamentaryattacksandincivility
AT zeljkopoljak roleofgenderinparliamentaryattacksandincivility