Surface quality and endothelial cell viability after femtosecond laser-assisted donor lenticule preparation for endothelial keratoplasty - An in-vitro study

Purpose: To compare surface quality and endothelial cell viability of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) donor lenticules prepared with femtosecond laser (FSL) or microkeratome (MK). Methods: Experimental ex-vivo evaluation of 15 DSAEK donor lenticules prepared from optica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeewan S Titiyal, M J Aravind, Manpreet Kaur, Tapas C Nag, Namrata Sharma, Tushar Agarwal, Rajesh Sinha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2020;volume=68;issue=11;spage=2404;epage=2407;aulast=Titiyal
_version_ 1818192104914944000
author Jeewan S Titiyal
M J Aravind
Manpreet Kaur
Tapas C Nag
Namrata Sharma
Tushar Agarwal
Rajesh Sinha
author_facet Jeewan S Titiyal
M J Aravind
Manpreet Kaur
Tapas C Nag
Namrata Sharma
Tushar Agarwal
Rajesh Sinha
author_sort Jeewan S Titiyal
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: To compare surface quality and endothelial cell viability of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) donor lenticules prepared with femtosecond laser (FSL) or microkeratome (MK). Methods: Experimental ex-vivo evaluation of 15 DSAEK donor lenticules prepared from optical quality donor corneas using 200 KHz FSL (9 eyes) or MK (6 eyes). Surface quality and smoothness of the cut were assessed using atomic force microscopy and endothelial cell viability was assessed using transmission electron microscopy. Results: Mean lenticule thickness was 121.89 ± 17.13 μm in FSL group and 112.67 ± 5.89 μm in MK group (P = 0.33). Average roughness of stromal surface (RMSavg) [FSL- 30.51 ± 4.55 nm, MK-22.37 ± 1.83 nm; P = 0.02] and root mean square roughness (RMSrough) [FSL-31.39 ± 5.75 nm, MK-23.08 ± 0.40 nm; P = 0.012] was significantly more in FSL group. Increased granular and linear irregularities were observed in the FSL group. Endothelial cell disruption was more in FSL group (FSL- 29.49 ± 6.91% MK-13.28 ± 3.62%; P < 0.001) with decreased mean nucleus length (FSL-5.56 ± 0.17 μm, MK-7.52 ± 0.65 μm; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Automated MKs are still the standard of care for donor lenticule preparation and MK-assisted donor lenticules have smoother surface with less endothelial cell disruption than FSL. Further research is mandatory before FSL platforms can be considered a viable alternative to the MK.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T00:25:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-54a632c14407465591ea123c22ab84a9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T00:25:12Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-54a632c14407465591ea123c22ab84a92022-12-22T00:44:38ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892020-01-0168112404240710.4103/ijo.IJO_99_20Surface quality and endothelial cell viability after femtosecond laser-assisted donor lenticule preparation for endothelial keratoplasty - An in-vitro studyJeewan S TitiyalM J AravindManpreet KaurTapas C NagNamrata SharmaTushar AgarwalRajesh SinhaPurpose: To compare surface quality and endothelial cell viability of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) donor lenticules prepared with femtosecond laser (FSL) or microkeratome (MK). Methods: Experimental ex-vivo evaluation of 15 DSAEK donor lenticules prepared from optical quality donor corneas using 200 KHz FSL (9 eyes) or MK (6 eyes). Surface quality and smoothness of the cut were assessed using atomic force microscopy and endothelial cell viability was assessed using transmission electron microscopy. Results: Mean lenticule thickness was 121.89 ± 17.13 μm in FSL group and 112.67 ± 5.89 μm in MK group (P = 0.33). Average roughness of stromal surface (RMSavg) [FSL- 30.51 ± 4.55 nm, MK-22.37 ± 1.83 nm; P = 0.02] and root mean square roughness (RMSrough) [FSL-31.39 ± 5.75 nm, MK-23.08 ± 0.40 nm; P = 0.012] was significantly more in FSL group. Increased granular and linear irregularities were observed in the FSL group. Endothelial cell disruption was more in FSL group (FSL- 29.49 ± 6.91% MK-13.28 ± 3.62%; P < 0.001) with decreased mean nucleus length (FSL-5.56 ± 0.17 μm, MK-7.52 ± 0.65 μm; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Automated MKs are still the standard of care for donor lenticule preparation and MK-assisted donor lenticules have smoother surface with less endothelial cell disruption than FSL. Further research is mandatory before FSL platforms can be considered a viable alternative to the MK.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2020;volume=68;issue=11;spage=2404;epage=2407;aulast=Titiyaldescemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplastyfemtosecond laser-assisted endothelial keratoplastyfemtosecond lasersmicrokeratome assisted endothelial keratoplasty
spellingShingle Jeewan S Titiyal
M J Aravind
Manpreet Kaur
Tapas C Nag
Namrata Sharma
Tushar Agarwal
Rajesh Sinha
Surface quality and endothelial cell viability after femtosecond laser-assisted donor lenticule preparation for endothelial keratoplasty - An in-vitro study
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty
femtosecond laser-assisted endothelial keratoplasty
femtosecond lasers
microkeratome assisted endothelial keratoplasty
title Surface quality and endothelial cell viability after femtosecond laser-assisted donor lenticule preparation for endothelial keratoplasty - An in-vitro study
title_full Surface quality and endothelial cell viability after femtosecond laser-assisted donor lenticule preparation for endothelial keratoplasty - An in-vitro study
title_fullStr Surface quality and endothelial cell viability after femtosecond laser-assisted donor lenticule preparation for endothelial keratoplasty - An in-vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Surface quality and endothelial cell viability after femtosecond laser-assisted donor lenticule preparation for endothelial keratoplasty - An in-vitro study
title_short Surface quality and endothelial cell viability after femtosecond laser-assisted donor lenticule preparation for endothelial keratoplasty - An in-vitro study
title_sort surface quality and endothelial cell viability after femtosecond laser assisted donor lenticule preparation for endothelial keratoplasty an in vitro study
topic descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty
femtosecond laser-assisted endothelial keratoplasty
femtosecond lasers
microkeratome assisted endothelial keratoplasty
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2020;volume=68;issue=11;spage=2404;epage=2407;aulast=Titiyal
work_keys_str_mv AT jeewanstitiyal surfacequalityandendothelialcellviabilityafterfemtosecondlaserassisteddonorlenticulepreparationforendothelialkeratoplastyaninvitrostudy
AT mjaravind surfacequalityandendothelialcellviabilityafterfemtosecondlaserassisteddonorlenticulepreparationforendothelialkeratoplastyaninvitrostudy
AT manpreetkaur surfacequalityandendothelialcellviabilityafterfemtosecondlaserassisteddonorlenticulepreparationforendothelialkeratoplastyaninvitrostudy
AT tapascnag surfacequalityandendothelialcellviabilityafterfemtosecondlaserassisteddonorlenticulepreparationforendothelialkeratoplastyaninvitrostudy
AT namratasharma surfacequalityandendothelialcellviabilityafterfemtosecondlaserassisteddonorlenticulepreparationforendothelialkeratoplastyaninvitrostudy
AT tusharagarwal surfacequalityandendothelialcellviabilityafterfemtosecondlaserassisteddonorlenticulepreparationforendothelialkeratoplastyaninvitrostudy
AT rajeshsinha surfacequalityandendothelialcellviabilityafterfemtosecondlaserassisteddonorlenticulepreparationforendothelialkeratoplastyaninvitrostudy