Relationship between central corneal thickness and axial eye length using partial coherence interferometry

Background and aim Several studies have shown the relationship between axial length (AL) of the eye and central corneal thickness (CCT). Since genetics, ethnicity, and race can affect these factors, their differences between different societies can probably explain refractive error variance. We pres...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wafaa A.E Abdelkhalek, Hanan S Hegazy, Mohamed I El-Kasaby
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2022-01-01
Series:Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.azmj.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1687-1693;year=2022;volume=20;issue=1;spage=148;epage=153;aulast=Abdelkhalek
_version_ 1797995725883179008
author Wafaa A.E Abdelkhalek
Hanan S Hegazy
Mohamed I El-Kasaby
author_facet Wafaa A.E Abdelkhalek
Hanan S Hegazy
Mohamed I El-Kasaby
author_sort Wafaa A.E Abdelkhalek
collection DOAJ
description Background and aim Several studies have shown the relationship between axial length (AL) of the eye and central corneal thickness (CCT). Since genetics, ethnicity, and race can affect these factors, their differences between different societies can probably explain refractive error variance. We present the ocular parameter values in 154 eyes of different refractive error groups to investigate the correlation between AL of the eye and CCT in Egyptians with refractive errors. Patients and methods In all, 154 patients were classified into emmetropic, hypermetropic, simple myopic, congenital myopic, and malignant myopic groups. Most ocular parameters were achieved using IOLMaster 700 and stratified according to AL and CCT. Results The CCT means in the studied groups was 537±34, 523±31, 541±40, 524±40, and 524±27 μm in emmetropic, hypermetropic, simple myopic, congenital myopic, and malignant myopic groups, respectively. The AL was 23±0.76, 22±1.1, 25±1.3, 26±1.4, and 29±1.6 mm, respectively. Regarding the correlation between AL of the eye and CCT (r=−0.01, P=0.92, confidence interval=−0.17 to 0.15). Conclusion This study provided valued measurements of ocular parameters of the Egyptians with refractive errors. Besides, there is no significant correlation between AL of the eye and its CCT in Egyptians with errors of refraction.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T10:06:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-54a66ac922ab4bc09792c12439324d9a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1687-1693
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T10:06:12Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-54a66ac922ab4bc09792c12439324d9a2022-12-22T04:30:14ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAl-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal1687-16932022-01-0120114815310.4103/azmj.azmj_139_21Relationship between central corneal thickness and axial eye length using partial coherence interferometryWafaa A.E AbdelkhalekHanan S HegazyMohamed I El-KasabyBackground and aim Several studies have shown the relationship between axial length (AL) of the eye and central corneal thickness (CCT). Since genetics, ethnicity, and race can affect these factors, their differences between different societies can probably explain refractive error variance. We present the ocular parameter values in 154 eyes of different refractive error groups to investigate the correlation between AL of the eye and CCT in Egyptians with refractive errors. Patients and methods In all, 154 patients were classified into emmetropic, hypermetropic, simple myopic, congenital myopic, and malignant myopic groups. Most ocular parameters were achieved using IOLMaster 700 and stratified according to AL and CCT. Results The CCT means in the studied groups was 537±34, 523±31, 541±40, 524±40, and 524±27 μm in emmetropic, hypermetropic, simple myopic, congenital myopic, and malignant myopic groups, respectively. The AL was 23±0.76, 22±1.1, 25±1.3, 26±1.4, and 29±1.6 mm, respectively. Regarding the correlation between AL of the eye and CCT (r=−0.01, P=0.92, confidence interval=−0.17 to 0.15). Conclusion This study provided valued measurements of ocular parameters of the Egyptians with refractive errors. Besides, there is no significant correlation between AL of the eye and its CCT in Egyptians with errors of refraction.http://www.azmj.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1687-1693;year=2022;volume=20;issue=1;spage=148;epage=153;aulast=Abdelkhalekaxial lengthcentral corneal thicknessiolmaster 700
spellingShingle Wafaa A.E Abdelkhalek
Hanan S Hegazy
Mohamed I El-Kasaby
Relationship between central corneal thickness and axial eye length using partial coherence interferometry
Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal
axial length
central corneal thickness
iolmaster 700
title Relationship between central corneal thickness and axial eye length using partial coherence interferometry
title_full Relationship between central corneal thickness and axial eye length using partial coherence interferometry
title_fullStr Relationship between central corneal thickness and axial eye length using partial coherence interferometry
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between central corneal thickness and axial eye length using partial coherence interferometry
title_short Relationship between central corneal thickness and axial eye length using partial coherence interferometry
title_sort relationship between central corneal thickness and axial eye length using partial coherence interferometry
topic axial length
central corneal thickness
iolmaster 700
url http://www.azmj.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1687-1693;year=2022;volume=20;issue=1;spage=148;epage=153;aulast=Abdelkhalek
work_keys_str_mv AT wafaaaeabdelkhalek relationshipbetweencentralcornealthicknessandaxialeyelengthusingpartialcoherenceinterferometry
AT hananshegazy relationshipbetweencentralcornealthicknessandaxialeyelengthusingpartialcoherenceinterferometry
AT mohamedielkasaby relationshipbetweencentralcornealthicknessandaxialeyelengthusingpartialcoherenceinterferometry