Simple decision-tree tool to facilitate author identification of reporting guidelines during submission: a before–after study
Abstract Background There is evidence that direct journal endorsement of reporting guidelines can lead to important improvements in the quality and reliability of the published research. However, over the last 20 years, there has been a proliferation of reporting guidelines for different study desig...
Main Authors: | Daniel R. Shanahan, Ines Lopes de Sousa, Diana M. Marshall |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Research Integrity and Peer Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41073-017-0044-9 |
Similar Items
-
Submission Guidelines
by: Equipe Editorial
Published: (2013-06-01) -
Incomplete reporting of complex interventions: a call to action for journal editors to review their submission guidelines
by: Mairead Ryan, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Reported use of reporting guidelines among JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute authors, editorial outcomes, and reviewer ratings related to adherence to guidelines and clarity of presentation
by: Jeannine Botos
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Submission Guidelines, 1(1)
by: Language Documentation & Conservation
Published: (2007-06-01) -
Saving time and money in biomedical publishing: the case for free-format submissions with minimal requirements
by: Amy Clotworthy, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)