Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling

Abstract The present study deals with the evaluation of a three-mixed array dataset for the detection of subsurface cavities using conceptual air-filled cavity model sets at different depths. Cavity models were simulated using the forward modelling technique to generate synthetic apparent resistivit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wael Dosoky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2023-10-01
Series:SN Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05539-w
_version_ 1797636749399162880
author Wael Dosoky
author_facet Wael Dosoky
author_sort Wael Dosoky
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The present study deals with the evaluation of a three-mixed array dataset for the detection of subsurface cavities using conceptual air-filled cavity model sets at different depths. Cavity models were simulated using the forward modelling technique to generate synthetic apparent resistivity data for three common individual arrays. These arrays are dipole–dipole (DD), pole–dipole (PD), and Wenner–Schlumberger (WS). The synthetically apparent resistivity data obtained from two different individual arrays were merged to form a high-resolution single model. Consequently, three possible mixed arrays datasets can be obtained: the dipole–dipole-Wenner–Schlumberger (DD+WS), pole–dipole, and Wenner–Schlumberger (PD+WS), and dipole–dipole and pole–dipole (DD+PD). The synthetically apparent resistivity data for both the individual and mixed arrays were inverted using Res2dinv software based on the robust constrain inversion technique to obtain a 2D resistivity model section. The inverted resistivity sections were evaluated in terms of their recovering ability of the model’s parameters (e.g. resistivity, and geometry). The results show that the individual arrays can resolve the location and dimensions of the cavity within reasonable accuracy only at a depth not exceeding 6 m below the surface. On the other hand, a significant resolution enhancement in model resistivity with increasing depth was observed when the mixed arrays were used. The (DD+WS) mixed arrays dataset brings up better model resistivity and shows closer parameters to the true actual model among the other mixed arrays. So it is strongly recommended for cavity detection studies.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T12:38:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-54d3438fd7a9480dba7b2fdb0f654c54
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2523-3963
2523-3971
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T12:38:38Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series SN Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-54d3438fd7a9480dba7b2fdb0f654c542023-11-05T12:26:37ZengSpringerSN Applied Sciences2523-39632523-39712023-10-0151111310.1007/s42452-023-05539-wAssessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modellingWael Dosoky0Faculty of Science, Geology Department, South Valley UniversityAbstract The present study deals with the evaluation of a three-mixed array dataset for the detection of subsurface cavities using conceptual air-filled cavity model sets at different depths. Cavity models were simulated using the forward modelling technique to generate synthetic apparent resistivity data for three common individual arrays. These arrays are dipole–dipole (DD), pole–dipole (PD), and Wenner–Schlumberger (WS). The synthetically apparent resistivity data obtained from two different individual arrays were merged to form a high-resolution single model. Consequently, three possible mixed arrays datasets can be obtained: the dipole–dipole-Wenner–Schlumberger (DD+WS), pole–dipole, and Wenner–Schlumberger (PD+WS), and dipole–dipole and pole–dipole (DD+PD). The synthetically apparent resistivity data for both the individual and mixed arrays were inverted using Res2dinv software based on the robust constrain inversion technique to obtain a 2D resistivity model section. The inverted resistivity sections were evaluated in terms of their recovering ability of the model’s parameters (e.g. resistivity, and geometry). The results show that the individual arrays can resolve the location and dimensions of the cavity within reasonable accuracy only at a depth not exceeding 6 m below the surface. On the other hand, a significant resolution enhancement in model resistivity with increasing depth was observed when the mixed arrays were used. The (DD+WS) mixed arrays dataset brings up better model resistivity and shows closer parameters to the true actual model among the other mixed arrays. So it is strongly recommended for cavity detection studies.https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05539-wMixed arraysIndividual arraysNumerical modellingCavity detection
spellingShingle Wael Dosoky
Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling
SN Applied Sciences
Mixed arrays
Individual arrays
Numerical modelling
Cavity detection
title Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling
title_full Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling
title_fullStr Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling
title_short Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling
title_sort assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling
topic Mixed arrays
Individual arrays
Numerical modelling
Cavity detection
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05539-w
work_keys_str_mv AT waeldosoky assessmentofthreemixedarraysdatasetforsubsurfacecavitiesdetectionusingresistivitytomographyasinferredfromnumericalmodelling