A Study on CO<sub>2</sub> Methanation and Steam Methane Reforming over Commercial Ni/Calcium Aluminate Catalysts

Three Ni-based natural gas steam reforming catalysts, i.e., commercial JM25-4Q and JM57-4Q, and a laboratory-made catalyst (26% Ni on a 5% SiO<sub>2</sub>–95% Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>), are tested in a laboratory reactor, under carbon dioxide methanation and me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriella Garbarino, Federico Pugliese, Tullio Cavattoni, Guido Busca, Paola Costamagna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/11/2792
Description
Summary:Three Ni-based natural gas steam reforming catalysts, i.e., commercial JM25-4Q and JM57-4Q, and a laboratory-made catalyst (26% Ni on a 5% SiO<sub>2</sub>–95% Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>), are tested in a laboratory reactor, under carbon dioxide methanation and methane steam reforming operating conditions. The laboratory catalyst is more active in both CO<sub>2</sub> methanation (equilibrium is reached at 623 K with 100% selectivity) and methane steam reforming (92% hydrogen yield at 890 K) than the two commercial catalysts, likely due to its higher nickel loading. In any case, commercial steam reforming catalysts also show interesting activity in CO<sub>2</sub> methanation, reduced by K-doping. The interpretation of the experimental results is supported by a one-dimensional (1D) pseudo-homogeneous packed-bed reactor model, embedding the Xu and Froment local kinetics, with appropriate kinetic parameters for each catalyst. In particular, the H<sub>2</sub>O adsorption coefficient adopted for the commercial catalysts is about two orders of magnitude higher than for the laboratory-made catalyst, and this is in line with the expectations, considering that the commercial catalysts have Ca and K added, which may promote water adsorption.
ISSN:1996-1073