Comparative analysis of permissioned blockchain frameworks for industrial applications
Blockchain is a technology that creates trust among non-trusting parties without relying on any intermediaries. Consequently, it has attracted the interest of companies operating in a multitude of sectors. However, due to the number of different blockchain solutions that have emerged in the last few...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2023-03-01
|
| Series: | Blockchain: Research and Applications |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096720922000549 |
| _version_ | 1827971445941075968 |
|---|---|
| author | Vittorio Capocasale Danilo Gotta Guido Perboli |
| author_facet | Vittorio Capocasale Danilo Gotta Guido Perboli |
| author_sort | Vittorio Capocasale |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Blockchain is a technology that creates trust among non-trusting parties without relying on any intermediaries. Consequently, it has attracted the interest of companies operating in a multitude of sectors. However, due to the number of different blockchain solutions that have emerged in the last few years and their rapid changes, it is challenging for such companies to orient their technological decisions. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the key dimensions—namely, governance, maturity, support, latency, privacy, interoperability, flexibility, efficiency, resiliency, and scalability—of some of the most-used permissioned blockchain platforms. Moreover, we present the results of a performance evaluation considering the following frameworks: Hyperledger Fabric 2.2, Hyperledger Sawtooth 1.2, and ConsenSys Quorum 21.1 (with both the GoQuorum client and the Hyperledger Besu client). The platforms were tested under similar conditions, and official releases were used, such that our findings provide a reference for companies establishing their technological orientation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-09T19:09:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-54ef93234d5d4ccc950bdff72b4f15d6 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2666-9536 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-09T19:09:06Z |
| publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Blockchain: Research and Applications |
| spelling | doaj.art-54ef93234d5d4ccc950bdff72b4f15d62023-04-07T06:50:00ZengElsevierBlockchain: Research and Applications2666-95362023-03-0141100113Comparative analysis of permissioned blockchain frameworks for industrial applicationsVittorio Capocasale0Danilo Gotta1Guido Perboli2Department of Control and Computer Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy; Corresponding authors.Service Innovation, TIM, Turin, Italy; Corresponding authors.Department of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy; Corresponding authors.Blockchain is a technology that creates trust among non-trusting parties without relying on any intermediaries. Consequently, it has attracted the interest of companies operating in a multitude of sectors. However, due to the number of different blockchain solutions that have emerged in the last few years and their rapid changes, it is challenging for such companies to orient their technological decisions. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the key dimensions—namely, governance, maturity, support, latency, privacy, interoperability, flexibility, efficiency, resiliency, and scalability—of some of the most-used permissioned blockchain platforms. Moreover, we present the results of a performance evaluation considering the following frameworks: Hyperledger Fabric 2.2, Hyperledger Sawtooth 1.2, and ConsenSys Quorum 21.1 (with both the GoQuorum client and the Hyperledger Besu client). The platforms were tested under similar conditions, and official releases were used, such that our findings provide a reference for companies establishing their technological orientation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096720922000549Blockchain performance evaluationHyperledger BesuHyperledger FabricHyperledger SawtoothQuorum |
| spellingShingle | Vittorio Capocasale Danilo Gotta Guido Perboli Comparative analysis of permissioned blockchain frameworks for industrial applications Blockchain: Research and Applications Blockchain performance evaluation Hyperledger Besu Hyperledger Fabric Hyperledger Sawtooth Quorum |
| title | Comparative analysis of permissioned blockchain frameworks for industrial applications |
| title_full | Comparative analysis of permissioned blockchain frameworks for industrial applications |
| title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of permissioned blockchain frameworks for industrial applications |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of permissioned blockchain frameworks for industrial applications |
| title_short | Comparative analysis of permissioned blockchain frameworks for industrial applications |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of permissioned blockchain frameworks for industrial applications |
| topic | Blockchain performance evaluation Hyperledger Besu Hyperledger Fabric Hyperledger Sawtooth Quorum |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096720922000549 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vittoriocapocasale comparativeanalysisofpermissionedblockchainframeworksforindustrialapplications AT danilogotta comparativeanalysisofpermissionedblockchainframeworksforindustrialapplications AT guidoperboli comparativeanalysisofpermissionedblockchainframeworksforindustrialapplications |