Nonamer dependent RAG cleavage at CpGs can explain mechanism of chromosomal translocations associated to lymphoid cancers.

Chromosomal translocations are considered as one of the major causes of lymphoid cancers. RAG complex, which is responsible for V(D)J recombination, can also cleave non-B DNA structures and cryptic RSSs in the genome leading to chromosomal translocations. The mechanism and factors regulating the ill...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amita M Paranjape, Sagar S Desai, Mayilaadumveettil Nishana, Urbi Roy, Namrata M Nilavar, Amrita Mondal, Rupa Kumari, Gudapureddy Radha, Vijeth Kumar Katapadi, Bibha Choudhary, Sathees C Raghavan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-10-01
Series:PLoS Genetics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010421
_version_ 1811244203350425600
author Amita M Paranjape
Sagar S Desai
Mayilaadumveettil Nishana
Urbi Roy
Namrata M Nilavar
Amrita Mondal
Rupa Kumari
Gudapureddy Radha
Vijeth Kumar Katapadi
Bibha Choudhary
Sathees C Raghavan
author_facet Amita M Paranjape
Sagar S Desai
Mayilaadumveettil Nishana
Urbi Roy
Namrata M Nilavar
Amrita Mondal
Rupa Kumari
Gudapureddy Radha
Vijeth Kumar Katapadi
Bibha Choudhary
Sathees C Raghavan
author_sort Amita M Paranjape
collection DOAJ
description Chromosomal translocations are considered as one of the major causes of lymphoid cancers. RAG complex, which is responsible for V(D)J recombination, can also cleave non-B DNA structures and cryptic RSSs in the genome leading to chromosomal translocations. The mechanism and factors regulating the illegitimate function of RAGs resulting in oncogenesis are largely unknown. Upon in silico analysis of 3760 chromosomal translocations from lymphoid cancer patients, we find that 93% of the translocation breakpoints possess adjacent cryptic nonamers (RAG binding sequences), of which 77% had CpGs in proximity. As a proof of principle, we show that RAGs can efficiently bind to cryptic nonamers present at multiple fragile regions and cleave at adjacent mismatches generated to mimic the deamination of CpGs. ChIP studies reveal that RAGs can indeed recognize these fragile sites on a chromatin context inside the cell. Finally, we show that AID, the cytidine deaminase, plays a significant role during the generation of mismatches at CpGs and reconstitute the process of RAG-dependent generation of DNA breaks both in vitro and inside the cells. Thus, we propose a novel mechanism for generation of chromosomal translocation, where RAGs bind to the cryptic nonamer sequences and direct cleavage at adjacent mismatch generated due to deamination of meCpGs or cytosines.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T14:21:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-54f57c96c51f4ad5b0b272d0cb05032a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1553-7390
1553-7404
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T14:21:52Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Genetics
spelling doaj.art-54f57c96c51f4ad5b0b272d0cb05032a2022-12-22T03:29:33ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Genetics1553-73901553-74042022-10-011810e101042110.1371/journal.pgen.1010421Nonamer dependent RAG cleavage at CpGs can explain mechanism of chromosomal translocations associated to lymphoid cancers.Amita M ParanjapeSagar S DesaiMayilaadumveettil NishanaUrbi RoyNamrata M NilavarAmrita MondalRupa KumariGudapureddy RadhaVijeth Kumar KatapadiBibha ChoudharySathees C RaghavanChromosomal translocations are considered as one of the major causes of lymphoid cancers. RAG complex, which is responsible for V(D)J recombination, can also cleave non-B DNA structures and cryptic RSSs in the genome leading to chromosomal translocations. The mechanism and factors regulating the illegitimate function of RAGs resulting in oncogenesis are largely unknown. Upon in silico analysis of 3760 chromosomal translocations from lymphoid cancer patients, we find that 93% of the translocation breakpoints possess adjacent cryptic nonamers (RAG binding sequences), of which 77% had CpGs in proximity. As a proof of principle, we show that RAGs can efficiently bind to cryptic nonamers present at multiple fragile regions and cleave at adjacent mismatches generated to mimic the deamination of CpGs. ChIP studies reveal that RAGs can indeed recognize these fragile sites on a chromatin context inside the cell. Finally, we show that AID, the cytidine deaminase, plays a significant role during the generation of mismatches at CpGs and reconstitute the process of RAG-dependent generation of DNA breaks both in vitro and inside the cells. Thus, we propose a novel mechanism for generation of chromosomal translocation, where RAGs bind to the cryptic nonamer sequences and direct cleavage at adjacent mismatch generated due to deamination of meCpGs or cytosines.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010421
spellingShingle Amita M Paranjape
Sagar S Desai
Mayilaadumveettil Nishana
Urbi Roy
Namrata M Nilavar
Amrita Mondal
Rupa Kumari
Gudapureddy Radha
Vijeth Kumar Katapadi
Bibha Choudhary
Sathees C Raghavan
Nonamer dependent RAG cleavage at CpGs can explain mechanism of chromosomal translocations associated to lymphoid cancers.
PLoS Genetics
title Nonamer dependent RAG cleavage at CpGs can explain mechanism of chromosomal translocations associated to lymphoid cancers.
title_full Nonamer dependent RAG cleavage at CpGs can explain mechanism of chromosomal translocations associated to lymphoid cancers.
title_fullStr Nonamer dependent RAG cleavage at CpGs can explain mechanism of chromosomal translocations associated to lymphoid cancers.
title_full_unstemmed Nonamer dependent RAG cleavage at CpGs can explain mechanism of chromosomal translocations associated to lymphoid cancers.
title_short Nonamer dependent RAG cleavage at CpGs can explain mechanism of chromosomal translocations associated to lymphoid cancers.
title_sort nonamer dependent rag cleavage at cpgs can explain mechanism of chromosomal translocations associated to lymphoid cancers
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010421
work_keys_str_mv AT amitamparanjape nonamerdependentragcleavageatcpgscanexplainmechanismofchromosomaltranslocationsassociatedtolymphoidcancers
AT sagarsdesai nonamerdependentragcleavageatcpgscanexplainmechanismofchromosomaltranslocationsassociatedtolymphoidcancers
AT mayilaadumveettilnishana nonamerdependentragcleavageatcpgscanexplainmechanismofchromosomaltranslocationsassociatedtolymphoidcancers
AT urbiroy nonamerdependentragcleavageatcpgscanexplainmechanismofchromosomaltranslocationsassociatedtolymphoidcancers
AT namratamnilavar nonamerdependentragcleavageatcpgscanexplainmechanismofchromosomaltranslocationsassociatedtolymphoidcancers
AT amritamondal nonamerdependentragcleavageatcpgscanexplainmechanismofchromosomaltranslocationsassociatedtolymphoidcancers
AT rupakumari nonamerdependentragcleavageatcpgscanexplainmechanismofchromosomaltranslocationsassociatedtolymphoidcancers
AT gudapureddyradha nonamerdependentragcleavageatcpgscanexplainmechanismofchromosomaltranslocationsassociatedtolymphoidcancers
AT vijethkumarkatapadi nonamerdependentragcleavageatcpgscanexplainmechanismofchromosomaltranslocationsassociatedtolymphoidcancers
AT bibhachoudhary nonamerdependentragcleavageatcpgscanexplainmechanismofchromosomaltranslocationsassociatedtolymphoidcancers
AT satheescraghavan nonamerdependentragcleavageatcpgscanexplainmechanismofchromosomaltranslocationsassociatedtolymphoidcancers