Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model

Study DesignMechanical study.PurposeTo compare the pullout strength of different screw designs and augmentation techniques in an osteoporotic bone model.Overview of LiteratureAdequate bone screw pullout strength is a common problem among osteoporotic patients. Various screw designs and augmentation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gorkem Kiyak, Tevfik Balikci, Ahmed Majid Heydar, Murat Bezer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Spine Society 2018-02-01
Series:Asian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-12-3.pdf
_version_ 1811302368812204032
author Gorkem Kiyak
Tevfik Balikci
Ahmed Majid Heydar
Murat Bezer
author_facet Gorkem Kiyak
Tevfik Balikci
Ahmed Majid Heydar
Murat Bezer
author_sort Gorkem Kiyak
collection DOAJ
description Study DesignMechanical study.PurposeTo compare the pullout strength of different screw designs and augmentation techniques in an osteoporotic bone model.Overview of LiteratureAdequate bone screw pullout strength is a common problem among osteoporotic patients. Various screw designs and augmentation techniques have been developed to improve the biomechanical characteristics of the bone–screw interface.MethodsPolyurethane blocks were used to mimic human osteoporotic cancellous bone, and six different screw designs were tested. Five standard and expandable screws without augmentation, eight expandable screws with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or calcium phosphate augmentation, and distal cannulated screws with PMMA and calcium phosphate augmentation were tested. Mechanical tests were performed on 10 unused new screws of each group. Screws with or without augmentation were inserted in a block that was held in a fixture frame, and a longitudinal extraction force was applied to the screw head at a loading rate of 5 mm/min. Maximum load was recorded in a load displacement curve.ResultsThe peak pullout force of all tested screws with or without augmentation was significantly greater than that of the standard pedicle screw. The greatest pullout force was observed with 40-mm expandable pedicle screws with four fins and PMMA augmentation. Augmented distal cannulated screws did not have a greater peak pullout force than nonaugmented expandable screws. PMMA augmentation provided a greater peak pullout force than calcium phosphate augmentation.ConclusionsExpandable pedicle screws had greater peak pullout forces than standard pedicle screws and had the advantage of augmentation with either PMMA or calcium phosphate cement. Although calcium phosphate cement is biodegradable, osteoconductive, and nonexothermic, PMMA provided a significantly greater peak pullout force. PMMA-augmented expandable 40-mm four-fin pedicle screws had the greatest peak pullout force.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T07:26:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5501080057344bf7b8b0e9f986020686
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1976-1902
1976-7846
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T07:26:52Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher Korean Spine Society
record_format Article
series Asian Spine Journal
spelling doaj.art-5501080057344bf7b8b0e9f9860206862022-12-22T02:56:27ZengKorean Spine SocietyAsian Spine Journal1976-19021976-78462018-02-0112131110.4184/asj.2018.12.1.3351Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone ModelGorkem Kiyak0Tevfik Balikci1Ahmed Majid Heydar2Murat Bezer3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medistate Hospital Kavacık, Istanbul, Turkey.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.Study DesignMechanical study.PurposeTo compare the pullout strength of different screw designs and augmentation techniques in an osteoporotic bone model.Overview of LiteratureAdequate bone screw pullout strength is a common problem among osteoporotic patients. Various screw designs and augmentation techniques have been developed to improve the biomechanical characteristics of the bone–screw interface.MethodsPolyurethane blocks were used to mimic human osteoporotic cancellous bone, and six different screw designs were tested. Five standard and expandable screws without augmentation, eight expandable screws with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or calcium phosphate augmentation, and distal cannulated screws with PMMA and calcium phosphate augmentation were tested. Mechanical tests were performed on 10 unused new screws of each group. Screws with or without augmentation were inserted in a block that was held in a fixture frame, and a longitudinal extraction force was applied to the screw head at a loading rate of 5 mm/min. Maximum load was recorded in a load displacement curve.ResultsThe peak pullout force of all tested screws with or without augmentation was significantly greater than that of the standard pedicle screw. The greatest pullout force was observed with 40-mm expandable pedicle screws with four fins and PMMA augmentation. Augmented distal cannulated screws did not have a greater peak pullout force than nonaugmented expandable screws. PMMA augmentation provided a greater peak pullout force than calcium phosphate augmentation.ConclusionsExpandable pedicle screws had greater peak pullout forces than standard pedicle screws and had the advantage of augmentation with either PMMA or calcium phosphate cement. Although calcium phosphate cement is biodegradable, osteoconductive, and nonexothermic, PMMA provided a significantly greater peak pullout force. PMMA-augmented expandable 40-mm four-fin pedicle screws had the greatest peak pullout force.http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-12-3.pdfScrewPedicleExpandableOsteoporosisAugmentation
spellingShingle Gorkem Kiyak
Tevfik Balikci
Ahmed Majid Heydar
Murat Bezer
Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model
Asian Spine Journal
Screw
Pedicle
Expandable
Osteoporosis
Augmentation
title Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model
title_full Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model
title_fullStr Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model
title_short Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model
title_sort comparison of the pullout strength of different pedicle screw designs and augmentation techniques in an osteoporotic bone model
topic Screw
Pedicle
Expandable
Osteoporosis
Augmentation
url http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-12-3.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gorkemkiyak comparisonofthepulloutstrengthofdifferentpediclescrewdesignsandaugmentationtechniquesinanosteoporoticbonemodel
AT tevfikbalikci comparisonofthepulloutstrengthofdifferentpediclescrewdesignsandaugmentationtechniquesinanosteoporoticbonemodel
AT ahmedmajidheydar comparisonofthepulloutstrengthofdifferentpediclescrewdesignsandaugmentationtechniquesinanosteoporoticbonemodel
AT muratbezer comparisonofthepulloutstrengthofdifferentpediclescrewdesignsandaugmentationtechniquesinanosteoporoticbonemodel