ESG risk rating disagreement: implications on portfolio performance
This paper examines the ESG risk rating disagreement across two-well established rating providers and its implication on portfolio performance. By deriving a proxy for rating disagreement using the average standard deviation of pairwise percentile ranking across Refinitiv and Sustainalytics, this st...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
General Association of Economists from Romania
2024-03-01
|
Series: | Theoretical and Applied Economics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
http://store.ectap.ro/articole/1728.pdf
|
_version_ | 1797205489416667136 |
---|---|
author | Diana-Mihaela SANDU |
author_facet | Diana-Mihaela SANDU |
author_sort | Diana-Mihaela SANDU |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This paper examines the ESG risk rating disagreement across two-well established rating
providers and its implication on portfolio performance. By deriving a proxy for rating disagreement
using the average standard deviation of pairwise percentile ranking across Refinitiv and
Sustainalytics, this study examined the risk-adjusted performance of high and low disagreement
portfolios. For each portfolio, four risk-adjusted measures (Sharpe ratio, Treynor ratio, Modigliani-
Squared and Jensen’s alpha) were calculated. In general, the study found that the best performer
was the low-disagreement portfolio, but the results were not favourable for any portfolio. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T08:51:56Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-55067454c43f492690bfb379aa62d827 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1841-8678 1844-0029 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T08:51:56Z |
publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
publisher | General Association of Economists from Romania |
record_format | Article |
series | Theoretical and Applied Economics |
spelling | doaj.art-55067454c43f492690bfb379aa62d8272024-04-16T09:19:13ZengGeneral Association of Economists from RomaniaTheoretical and Applied Economics1841-86781844-00292024-03-01XXXI116116818418678ESG risk rating disagreement: implications on portfolio performanceDiana-Mihaela SANDU0 Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania This paper examines the ESG risk rating disagreement across two-well established rating providers and its implication on portfolio performance. By deriving a proxy for rating disagreement using the average standard deviation of pairwise percentile ranking across Refinitiv and Sustainalytics, this study examined the risk-adjusted performance of high and low disagreement portfolios. For each portfolio, four risk-adjusted measures (Sharpe ratio, Treynor ratio, Modigliani- Squared and Jensen’s alpha) were calculated. In general, the study found that the best performer was the low-disagreement portfolio, but the results were not favourable for any portfolio. http://store.ectap.ro/articole/1728.pdf esg disagreementportfolio performancerisk-adjusted measuresindustryeurope |
spellingShingle | Diana-Mihaela SANDU ESG risk rating disagreement: implications on portfolio performance Theoretical and Applied Economics esg disagreement portfolio performance risk-adjusted measures industry europe |
title | ESG risk rating disagreement: implications on portfolio performance |
title_full | ESG risk rating disagreement: implications on portfolio performance |
title_fullStr | ESG risk rating disagreement: implications on portfolio performance |
title_full_unstemmed | ESG risk rating disagreement: implications on portfolio performance |
title_short | ESG risk rating disagreement: implications on portfolio performance |
title_sort | esg risk rating disagreement implications on portfolio performance |
topic | esg disagreement portfolio performance risk-adjusted measures industry europe |
url |
http://store.ectap.ro/articole/1728.pdf
|
work_keys_str_mv | AT dianamihaelasandu esgriskratingdisagreementimplicationsonportfolioperformance |