Limitations of the Historical-Critical Method According to Joseph Ratzinger (Benedict XVI)

According to Joseph Ratzinger the appearance of the historical-critical method simultaneously gave rise to the struggle for its scope and character. This method is an indispensable tool of exegetic craft, but it has its limitations as well. It’s shortcomings of the historical-critical method that ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sławomir Zatwardnicki
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Polskie Towarzystwo Teologiczne 2014-06-01
Series:Ruch Biblijny i Liturgiczny
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rbl.ptt.net.pl/index.php/RBL/article/view/38
Description
Summary:According to Joseph Ratzinger the appearance of the historical-critical method simultaneously gave rise to the struggle for its scope and character. This method is an indispensable tool of exegetic craft, but it has its limitations as well. It’s shortcomings of the historical-critical method that are presented and discussed one by one in the article, and they are the following: looking only for historical meaning of the text; pointing only to one dimension (the human one) of Holy Scriptures; lack of continuity as one of principles of the method; outcomes of the research being hypothetical. At the end of the article a dangerous discord between scientific research and study of theological meaning of texts is highlighted. Benedict XVI’s appeal to reinstate theological principles mentioned in the Dogmatic Constitution Dei Verbum and to link them with scientific principles was reminded of as well.
ISSN:0209-0872
2391-8497