Uneven burden of multidimensional poverty in India: A caste based analysis.

Poverty is multifaceted. The global poverty profile shows 41% of multidimensionally poor people living in South Asian countries. Though castes and tribes are a more prevalent line of social stratification in India, and their socio-economic characteristics also vary remarkably, hardly any study has e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Itishree Pradhan, Binayak Kandapan, Jalandhar Pradhan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271806
_version_ 1811308685016694784
author Itishree Pradhan
Binayak Kandapan
Jalandhar Pradhan
author_facet Itishree Pradhan
Binayak Kandapan
Jalandhar Pradhan
author_sort Itishree Pradhan
collection DOAJ
description Poverty is multifaceted. The global poverty profile shows 41% of multidimensionally poor people living in South Asian countries. Though castes and tribes are a more prevalent line of social stratification in India, and their socio-economic characteristics also vary remarkably, hardly any study has explored these dimensions while analysing multidimensional poverty in India. Hence, this study attempts to assess the multidimensional status of poverty among the social groups in India. National Family Health Survey, 2015-16 (NFHS-4) is a source of rich information on 579,698 households' well-being for this analysis. Alkire- Foster technique was applied to decompose the Multidimensional Poverty Index (M0) across its dimensions and indicators for all the social groups. Three broad dimensions of deprivation-Health, Education and Standard of Living-include 12 indicators, guided by the poverty literature, data availability and the country's sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). There were three main findings in this study: (1) Scheduled Tribes (STs) are the most disadvantaged subgroup in India with remarkably high values of headcount (H = 0.444;), intensity (A = 0.486), and M0 (0.216), followed by Scheduled Castes (SCs) (H = 0.292; A = 0.473; M0 = 0.138), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs) (H = 0.245; A = 0.465; M0 = 0.114); and Others category is the most privileged with very low values of H = 0.149, A = 0.463, and M0 = 0.069; (2) STs contribute nearly twice their population share for both H and M0, and the SCs contribution is also noticeably higher than their population share; (3) States located in the central and eastern regions of India have the higher H, A and M0 for all the social groups. This suggests that there is a need for a thorough assessment of poverty at specific levels to uncover the poverty situation in society, improve the effectiveness of evidence-based planning and effective policymaking.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T09:28:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-55292d79c3754fb7b4435c74fa57526e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T09:28:53Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-55292d79c3754fb7b4435c74fa57526e2022-12-22T02:52:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01177e027180610.1371/journal.pone.0271806Uneven burden of multidimensional poverty in India: A caste based analysis.Itishree PradhanBinayak KandapanJalandhar PradhanPoverty is multifaceted. The global poverty profile shows 41% of multidimensionally poor people living in South Asian countries. Though castes and tribes are a more prevalent line of social stratification in India, and their socio-economic characteristics also vary remarkably, hardly any study has explored these dimensions while analysing multidimensional poverty in India. Hence, this study attempts to assess the multidimensional status of poverty among the social groups in India. National Family Health Survey, 2015-16 (NFHS-4) is a source of rich information on 579,698 households' well-being for this analysis. Alkire- Foster technique was applied to decompose the Multidimensional Poverty Index (M0) across its dimensions and indicators for all the social groups. Three broad dimensions of deprivation-Health, Education and Standard of Living-include 12 indicators, guided by the poverty literature, data availability and the country's sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). There were three main findings in this study: (1) Scheduled Tribes (STs) are the most disadvantaged subgroup in India with remarkably high values of headcount (H = 0.444;), intensity (A = 0.486), and M0 (0.216), followed by Scheduled Castes (SCs) (H = 0.292; A = 0.473; M0 = 0.138), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs) (H = 0.245; A = 0.465; M0 = 0.114); and Others category is the most privileged with very low values of H = 0.149, A = 0.463, and M0 = 0.069; (2) STs contribute nearly twice their population share for both H and M0, and the SCs contribution is also noticeably higher than their population share; (3) States located in the central and eastern regions of India have the higher H, A and M0 for all the social groups. This suggests that there is a need for a thorough assessment of poverty at specific levels to uncover the poverty situation in society, improve the effectiveness of evidence-based planning and effective policymaking.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271806
spellingShingle Itishree Pradhan
Binayak Kandapan
Jalandhar Pradhan
Uneven burden of multidimensional poverty in India: A caste based analysis.
PLoS ONE
title Uneven burden of multidimensional poverty in India: A caste based analysis.
title_full Uneven burden of multidimensional poverty in India: A caste based analysis.
title_fullStr Uneven burden of multidimensional poverty in India: A caste based analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Uneven burden of multidimensional poverty in India: A caste based analysis.
title_short Uneven burden of multidimensional poverty in India: A caste based analysis.
title_sort uneven burden of multidimensional poverty in india a caste based analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271806
work_keys_str_mv AT itishreepradhan unevenburdenofmultidimensionalpovertyinindiaacastebasedanalysis
AT binayakkandapan unevenburdenofmultidimensionalpovertyinindiaacastebasedanalysis
AT jalandharpradhan unevenburdenofmultidimensionalpovertyinindiaacastebasedanalysis