Effect of Endometrial Sampling Procedures on Subsequent Pregnancy Rate of Cattle

Endometrial infections are a common cause of reproductive loss in cattle. Accurate diagnosis is important to reduce the economic losses caused by endometritis. A range of sampling procedures have been developed which enable collection of endometrial tissue or luminal cells or uterine fluid. However,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Orlando Ramirez-Garzon, Ricardo Soares Magalhaes, Nana Satake, Jonathan Hill, Claudia Jimenez, Michael K. Holland, Michael McGowan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/6/1683
_version_ 1797531306621403136
author Orlando Ramirez-Garzon
Ricardo Soares Magalhaes
Nana Satake
Jonathan Hill
Claudia Jimenez
Michael K. Holland
Michael McGowan
author_facet Orlando Ramirez-Garzon
Ricardo Soares Magalhaes
Nana Satake
Jonathan Hill
Claudia Jimenez
Michael K. Holland
Michael McGowan
author_sort Orlando Ramirez-Garzon
collection DOAJ
description Endometrial infections are a common cause of reproductive loss in cattle. Accurate diagnosis is important to reduce the economic losses caused by endometritis. A range of sampling procedures have been developed which enable collection of endometrial tissue or luminal cells or uterine fluid. However, as these are all invasive procedures, there is a risk that sampling around the time of breeding may adversely affect subsequent pregnancy rate. This systematic review compared the pregnancy rates (PR) of cattle which underwent uterine lavage (UL), cotton swab (CS), cytobrush (CB), cytotape (CT), or endometrial biopsy (EB) sampling procedures with those that were not sampled. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol, relevant databases, including Pubmed, Web of Science, CAB Abstracts, VetMed Resource–Ruminants, and Scopus, were searched. The outcome measured was the pregnancy rate after the collection of endometrial sample(s). Seven studies, involving a total of 3693 cows, fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and allowed the comparison of PR between sampled (<i>n</i> = 1254) and non-sampled cows (<i>n</i> = 2409). The results of the systematic review showed that endometrial sampling procedures can be performed before breeding or shortly after insemination without adversely affecting pregnancy rates in cattle. However, further studies are needed to validate this information.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T10:41:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-552a8919bfae4863a24b8336d80f1053
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T10:41:54Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-552a8919bfae4863a24b8336d80f10532023-11-21T22:54:18ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152021-06-01116168310.3390/ani11061683Effect of Endometrial Sampling Procedures on Subsequent Pregnancy Rate of CattleOrlando Ramirez-Garzon0Ricardo Soares Magalhaes1Nana Satake2Jonathan Hill3Claudia Jimenez4Michael K. Holland5Michael McGowan6School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, AustraliaChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD 4141, AustraliaSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, AustraliaSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, AustraliaFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad Nacional, Bogota 111321, ColombiaSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, AustraliaSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, AustraliaEndometrial infections are a common cause of reproductive loss in cattle. Accurate diagnosis is important to reduce the economic losses caused by endometritis. A range of sampling procedures have been developed which enable collection of endometrial tissue or luminal cells or uterine fluid. However, as these are all invasive procedures, there is a risk that sampling around the time of breeding may adversely affect subsequent pregnancy rate. This systematic review compared the pregnancy rates (PR) of cattle which underwent uterine lavage (UL), cotton swab (CS), cytobrush (CB), cytotape (CT), or endometrial biopsy (EB) sampling procedures with those that were not sampled. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol, relevant databases, including Pubmed, Web of Science, CAB Abstracts, VetMed Resource–Ruminants, and Scopus, were searched. The outcome measured was the pregnancy rate after the collection of endometrial sample(s). Seven studies, involving a total of 3693 cows, fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and allowed the comparison of PR between sampled (<i>n</i> = 1254) and non-sampled cows (<i>n</i> = 2409). The results of the systematic review showed that endometrial sampling procedures can be performed before breeding or shortly after insemination without adversely affecting pregnancy rates in cattle. However, further studies are needed to validate this information.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/6/1683cattlecotton swabendometrial biopsycytobrushcytotapeuterine lavage
spellingShingle Orlando Ramirez-Garzon
Ricardo Soares Magalhaes
Nana Satake
Jonathan Hill
Claudia Jimenez
Michael K. Holland
Michael McGowan
Effect of Endometrial Sampling Procedures on Subsequent Pregnancy Rate of Cattle
Animals
cattle
cotton swab
endometrial biopsy
cytobrush
cytotape
uterine lavage
title Effect of Endometrial Sampling Procedures on Subsequent Pregnancy Rate of Cattle
title_full Effect of Endometrial Sampling Procedures on Subsequent Pregnancy Rate of Cattle
title_fullStr Effect of Endometrial Sampling Procedures on Subsequent Pregnancy Rate of Cattle
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Endometrial Sampling Procedures on Subsequent Pregnancy Rate of Cattle
title_short Effect of Endometrial Sampling Procedures on Subsequent Pregnancy Rate of Cattle
title_sort effect of endometrial sampling procedures on subsequent pregnancy rate of cattle
topic cattle
cotton swab
endometrial biopsy
cytobrush
cytotape
uterine lavage
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/6/1683
work_keys_str_mv AT orlandoramirezgarzon effectofendometrialsamplingproceduresonsubsequentpregnancyrateofcattle
AT ricardosoaresmagalhaes effectofendometrialsamplingproceduresonsubsequentpregnancyrateofcattle
AT nanasatake effectofendometrialsamplingproceduresonsubsequentpregnancyrateofcattle
AT jonathanhill effectofendometrialsamplingproceduresonsubsequentpregnancyrateofcattle
AT claudiajimenez effectofendometrialsamplingproceduresonsubsequentpregnancyrateofcattle
AT michaelkholland effectofendometrialsamplingproceduresonsubsequentpregnancyrateofcattle
AT michaelmcgowan effectofendometrialsamplingproceduresonsubsequentpregnancyrateofcattle