Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) in compare to medroxyprogesterone acetate as a therapy for endometrial hyperplasia

Background: This study was designed to evaluate the comparison of insertion of levonorgestrel (LNG)-releasing intrauterine system versus oral medroxyprogesterone acetate on endometrial hyperplasia in a randomized controlled trial. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 women with the initial histopath...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fariba Behnamfar, Attaollah Ghahiri, Marzieh Tavakoli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2014;volume=19;issue=8;spage=686;epage=690;aulast=Behnamfar
_version_ 1818354997300035584
author Fariba Behnamfar
Attaollah Ghahiri
Marzieh Tavakoli
author_facet Fariba Behnamfar
Attaollah Ghahiri
Marzieh Tavakoli
author_sort Fariba Behnamfar
collection DOAJ
description Background: This study was designed to evaluate the comparison of insertion of levonorgestrel (LNG)-releasing intrauterine system versus oral medroxyprogesterone acetate on endometrial hyperplasia in a randomized controlled trial. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 women with the initial histopathological diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia in two groups received LNG or medroxyprogesterone (10 mg/d orally) for 12 days a month for 3 months). Endometrial biopsy was obtained for all patients after 3 months of treatment. Response to treatment was defined based on the histopathology of the post treatment pipelle endometrial specimens in three categories of resolution, persistence and progression. Results: Treatment response rate in patients in the LNG group was 89.3% (25 of 28 patients), versus 70.4% (19 of 27 patients) in patients in the medroxyprogesterone group. The rate of persistence was 10.7% (3 of 28 patients) and 22.2% (6 of 27 patients) in LNG and medroxyprogesterone groups respectively. No progression of endometrial hyperplasia observed in any of the patients in LNG group, but progression of endometrial hyperplasia was observed in 7.4% (2 of 27 patients) in the medroxyprogesterone group. There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding the response to treatment (P = 0.15). Side effects such as bloating, weight gain, fatigue and hair loss were comparable between the groups (P > 0.05). Hirsutism was significantly more in the medroxyprogesterone group than LNG group (P = 0.013). Conclusion: Results showed that the use of LNG for treating endometrial hyperplasia for 3 months was associated with high-treatment response rate and the low proportion of patients with progression compared to the use of medroxyprogesterone.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T19:34:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5540677e71f14b2897782033fa8cf251
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-1995
1735-7136
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T19:34:19Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-5540677e71f14b2897782033fa8cf2512022-12-21T23:33:52ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Medical Sciences1735-19951735-71362014-01-01198686690Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) in compare to medroxyprogesterone acetate as a therapy for endometrial hyperplasiaFariba BehnamfarAttaollah GhahiriMarzieh TavakoliBackground: This study was designed to evaluate the comparison of insertion of levonorgestrel (LNG)-releasing intrauterine system versus oral medroxyprogesterone acetate on endometrial hyperplasia in a randomized controlled trial. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 women with the initial histopathological diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia in two groups received LNG or medroxyprogesterone (10 mg/d orally) for 12 days a month for 3 months). Endometrial biopsy was obtained for all patients after 3 months of treatment. Response to treatment was defined based on the histopathology of the post treatment pipelle endometrial specimens in three categories of resolution, persistence and progression. Results: Treatment response rate in patients in the LNG group was 89.3% (25 of 28 patients), versus 70.4% (19 of 27 patients) in patients in the medroxyprogesterone group. The rate of persistence was 10.7% (3 of 28 patients) and 22.2% (6 of 27 patients) in LNG and medroxyprogesterone groups respectively. No progression of endometrial hyperplasia observed in any of the patients in LNG group, but progression of endometrial hyperplasia was observed in 7.4% (2 of 27 patients) in the medroxyprogesterone group. There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding the response to treatment (P = 0.15). Side effects such as bloating, weight gain, fatigue and hair loss were comparable between the groups (P > 0.05). Hirsutism was significantly more in the medroxyprogesterone group than LNG group (P = 0.013). Conclusion: Results showed that the use of LNG for treating endometrial hyperplasia for 3 months was associated with high-treatment response rate and the low proportion of patients with progression compared to the use of medroxyprogesterone.http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2014;volume=19;issue=8;spage=686;epage=690;aulast=BehnamfarEndometrial hyperplasialevonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systemmedroxyprogesterone
spellingShingle Fariba Behnamfar
Attaollah Ghahiri
Marzieh Tavakoli
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) in compare to medroxyprogesterone acetate as a therapy for endometrial hyperplasia
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Endometrial hyperplasia
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system
medroxyprogesterone
title Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) in compare to medroxyprogesterone acetate as a therapy for endometrial hyperplasia
title_full Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) in compare to medroxyprogesterone acetate as a therapy for endometrial hyperplasia
title_fullStr Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) in compare to medroxyprogesterone acetate as a therapy for endometrial hyperplasia
title_full_unstemmed Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) in compare to medroxyprogesterone acetate as a therapy for endometrial hyperplasia
title_short Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) in compare to medroxyprogesterone acetate as a therapy for endometrial hyperplasia
title_sort levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system mirena in compare to medroxyprogesterone acetate as a therapy for endometrial hyperplasia
topic Endometrial hyperplasia
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system
medroxyprogesterone
url http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2014;volume=19;issue=8;spage=686;epage=690;aulast=Behnamfar
work_keys_str_mv AT faribabehnamfar levonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemmirenaincomparetomedroxyprogesteroneacetateasatherapyforendometrialhyperplasia
AT attaollahghahiri levonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemmirenaincomparetomedroxyprogesteroneacetateasatherapyforendometrialhyperplasia
AT marziehtavakoli levonorgestrelreleasingintrauterinesystemmirenaincomparetomedroxyprogesteroneacetateasatherapyforendometrialhyperplasia