Effect of Row Spacing on Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i>) Growth, Yield, and Grain Quality under a Mediterranean Climate

Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i> Willd., Amaranthaceae) is an environmental stress-resilient crop of increasing global importance. Sowing density is a critical factor in the quinoa cultivation protocol. We evaluated the row-spacing effect on quinoa growth, yield, and grain quality under...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aviv Asher, Reut Dagan, Shmuel Galili, Lior Rubinovich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-08-01
Series:Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1298
_version_ 1797492420633427968
author Aviv Asher
Reut Dagan
Shmuel Galili
Lior Rubinovich
author_facet Aviv Asher
Reut Dagan
Shmuel Galili
Lior Rubinovich
author_sort Aviv Asher
collection DOAJ
description Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i> Willd., Amaranthaceae) is an environmental stress-resilient crop of increasing global importance. Sowing density is a critical factor in the quinoa cultivation protocol. We evaluated the row-spacing effect on quinoa growth, yield, and grain quality under Mediterranean conditions. We hypothesized that lower row spacing would reduce quinoa stem diameter and increase yield but may reduce grain quality. Two quinoa accessions were sown in northern Israel with 16, 26, or 80 cm between rows during two consecutive years, in November and January each year. Plant density at harvest ranged from 22 to 260 plants m<sup>−2</sup>. Plant height and stem diameter ranged from 77 to 126 and 6.3 to 10.5 cm, respectively. Hay, grain, and straw yield ranged from 2259 to 17,979, 1604 to 4266, and 1212 to 3660 kg DM ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Grain protein content (PC) ranged from 5.2 to 14.2 and thousand grain weight (TGW) from 2033 to 3446 mg. Plant density, hay, grain, and straw yield were negatively correlated to row spacing. Stem diameter was positively correlated to row spacing, while there were no correlations between this parameter and plant height, grain PC, or TGW. Results indicated that 16 cm between rows may be optimal, as this produced the greatest yields with no effect on grain quality. However, as it may result in plant lodging, 26 cm row spacing should also be considered. The effects of additional management-related parameters on quinoa production should be examined.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T01:02:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-55417c24c17f4620a2af6385c3fb394a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0472
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T01:02:28Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agriculture
spelling doaj.art-55417c24c17f4620a2af6385c3fb394a2023-11-23T14:31:38ZengMDPI AGAgriculture2077-04722022-08-01129129810.3390/agriculture12091298Effect of Row Spacing on Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i>) Growth, Yield, and Grain Quality under a Mediterranean ClimateAviv Asher0Reut Dagan1Shmuel Galili2Lior Rubinovich3Northern Agriculture R&D, MIGAL—Galilee Research Institute, Kiryat Shmona P.O. Box 831, IsraelNorthern Agriculture R&D, MIGAL—Galilee Research Institute, Kiryat Shmona P.O. Box 831, IsraelThe Volcani Center, Institute of Plant Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Rishon LeZion P.O. Box 15159, IsraelNorthern Agriculture R&D, MIGAL—Galilee Research Institute, Kiryat Shmona P.O. Box 831, IsraelQuinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i> Willd., Amaranthaceae) is an environmental stress-resilient crop of increasing global importance. Sowing density is a critical factor in the quinoa cultivation protocol. We evaluated the row-spacing effect on quinoa growth, yield, and grain quality under Mediterranean conditions. We hypothesized that lower row spacing would reduce quinoa stem diameter and increase yield but may reduce grain quality. Two quinoa accessions were sown in northern Israel with 16, 26, or 80 cm between rows during two consecutive years, in November and January each year. Plant density at harvest ranged from 22 to 260 plants m<sup>−2</sup>. Plant height and stem diameter ranged from 77 to 126 and 6.3 to 10.5 cm, respectively. Hay, grain, and straw yield ranged from 2259 to 17,979, 1604 to 4266, and 1212 to 3660 kg DM ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Grain protein content (PC) ranged from 5.2 to 14.2 and thousand grain weight (TGW) from 2033 to 3446 mg. Plant density, hay, grain, and straw yield were negatively correlated to row spacing. Stem diameter was positively correlated to row spacing, while there were no correlations between this parameter and plant height, grain PC, or TGW. Results indicated that 16 cm between rows may be optimal, as this produced the greatest yields with no effect on grain quality. However, as it may result in plant lodging, 26 cm row spacing should also be considered. The effects of additional management-related parameters on quinoa production should be examined.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1298food and feedhayseedsemi-aridsustainable
spellingShingle Aviv Asher
Reut Dagan
Shmuel Galili
Lior Rubinovich
Effect of Row Spacing on Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i>) Growth, Yield, and Grain Quality under a Mediterranean Climate
Agriculture
food and feed
hay
seed
semi-arid
sustainable
title Effect of Row Spacing on Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i>) Growth, Yield, and Grain Quality under a Mediterranean Climate
title_full Effect of Row Spacing on Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i>) Growth, Yield, and Grain Quality under a Mediterranean Climate
title_fullStr Effect of Row Spacing on Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i>) Growth, Yield, and Grain Quality under a Mediterranean Climate
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Row Spacing on Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i>) Growth, Yield, and Grain Quality under a Mediterranean Climate
title_short Effect of Row Spacing on Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i>) Growth, Yield, and Grain Quality under a Mediterranean Climate
title_sort effect of row spacing on quinoa i chenopodium quinoa i growth yield and grain quality under a mediterranean climate
topic food and feed
hay
seed
semi-arid
sustainable
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1298
work_keys_str_mv AT avivasher effectofrowspacingonquinoaichenopodiumquinoaigrowthyieldandgrainqualityunderamediterraneanclimate
AT reutdagan effectofrowspacingonquinoaichenopodiumquinoaigrowthyieldandgrainqualityunderamediterraneanclimate
AT shmuelgalili effectofrowspacingonquinoaichenopodiumquinoaigrowthyieldandgrainqualityunderamediterraneanclimate
AT liorrubinovich effectofrowspacingonquinoaichenopodiumquinoaigrowthyieldandgrainqualityunderamediterraneanclimate