The Effect of Probiotics and Synbiotics on Risk Factors Associated with Cardiometabolic Diseases in Healthy People—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials

We aimed to systematically review the effectiveness of probiotic/synbiotic formulations to counteract cardiometabolic risk (CMR) in healthy people not receiving adjunctive medication. The systematic search (PubMed/MEDLINE/Embase) until 1 August 2019 was performed for randomized controlled trials in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karolina Skonieczna-Żydecka, Karolina Kaźmierczak-Siedlecka, Mariusz Kaczmarczyk, Joanna Śliwa-Dominiak, Dominika Maciejewska, Katarzyna Janda, Ewa Stachowska, Beata Łoniewska, Damian Malinowski, Krzysztof Borecki, Wojciech Marlicz, Igor Łoniewski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/6/1788
Description
Summary:We aimed to systematically review the effectiveness of probiotic/synbiotic formulations to counteract cardiometabolic risk (CMR) in healthy people not receiving adjunctive medication. The systematic search (PubMed/MEDLINE/Embase) until 1 August 2019 was performed for randomized controlled trials in >20 adult patients. Random-effect meta-analysis subgroup and meta-regression analysis of co-primary (haemoglobin A1c (HbA1C), glucose, insulin, body weight, waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), cholesterol, low-density lipoproteins (LDL), high-density lipoproteins (HDL), triglycerides, and blood pressure) and secondary outcomes (uric acid, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1–PAI-1, fibrinogen, and any variable related to inflammation/endothelial dysfunction). We included 61 trials (5422 persons). The mean time of probiotic administration was 67.01 ± 38.72 days. Most of probiotic strains were of <i>Lactobacillus</i> and <i>Bifidobacterium</i> genera. The other strains were <i>Streptococci</i>, <i>Enterococci</i>, and <i>Pediococci</i>. The daily probiotic dose varied between 10<sup>6</sup> and 10<sup>10</sup> colony-forming units (CFU)/gram. Probiotics/synbiotics counteracted CMR factors (endpoint data on BMI: standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.156, <i>p</i> = 0.006 and difference in means (DM) = −0.45, <i>p</i> = 0.00 and on WC: SMD = −0.147, <i>p</i> = 0.05 and DM = −1.21, <i>p</i> = 0.02; change scores on WC: SMD = −0.166, <i>p</i> = 0.04 and DM = −1.35, <i>p</i> = 0.03) in healthy persons. Overweight/obese healthy people might additionally benefit from reducing total cholesterol concentration (change scores on WC in overweight/obese: SMD: −0.178, <i>p</i> = 0.049). Poor quality of probiotic-related trials make systematic reviews and meta-analyses difficult to conduct and draw definite conclusions. “Gold standard” methodology in probiotic studies awaits further development.
ISSN:2077-0383