Effects of assessment method (real-time versus video-recorded) on a validated pain-altered behavior scale used in castrated piglets

Abstract We aimed to compare two assessment methodologies (real-time vs. video-recorded) using the Unesp-Botucatu Pig Composite Acute Pain Scale (UPAPS) in piglets before and after castration. Twenty-nine male piglets were castrated. Four observers scored the UPAPS over three perioperative timepoint...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade, Magdiel Lopez-Soriano, Victoria Rocha Merenda, Rubia Mitalli Tomacheuski, Monique Danielle Pairis-Garcia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-10-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45869-8
_version_ 1797636960837173248
author Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade
Magdiel Lopez-Soriano
Victoria Rocha Merenda
Rubia Mitalli Tomacheuski
Monique Danielle Pairis-Garcia
author_facet Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade
Magdiel Lopez-Soriano
Victoria Rocha Merenda
Rubia Mitalli Tomacheuski
Monique Danielle Pairis-Garcia
author_sort Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We aimed to compare two assessment methodologies (real-time vs. video-recorded) using the Unesp-Botucatu Pig Composite Acute Pain Scale (UPAPS) in piglets before and after castration. Twenty-nine male piglets were castrated. Four observers scored the UPAPS over three perioperative timepoints of castration following two assessment methodologies. In real-time assessments, the observers were in-person observing the piglets in front of the pen. After two weeks, the observers did video-recorded assessments randomizing piglets and timepoints. Modeling was conducted to compare the UPAPS and each pain-altered behavior between methodologies. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland–Altman, and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were conducted to investigate agreement between methodologies. UPAPS was statistically equivalent between methodologies (P = 0.4371). The ICC for each method was very good (0.85 to 0.91). The agreement of the UPAPS assessed between methodologies had minimal bias (− 0.04), no proportion bias, and 53% of the assessments presented a perfect agreement. However, CCC of the UPAPS was moderate (0.65), and only one pain-altered behavior (“presents difficulty in overcoming obstacles or other animals”) occurred more in real-time assessments (P = 0.0444). In conclusion, piglet pain assessment by UPAPS can be conducted in real-time based on a suitable agreement between the real-time and video-recorded assessment methods.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T12:42:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-55850200e1314980895a184f96c5b147
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T12:42:38Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-55850200e1314980895a184f96c5b1472023-11-05T12:12:30ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-10-011311810.1038/s41598-023-45869-8Effects of assessment method (real-time versus video-recorded) on a validated pain-altered behavior scale used in castrated pigletsPedro Henrique Esteves Trindade0Magdiel Lopez-Soriano1Victoria Rocha Merenda2Rubia Mitalli Tomacheuski3Monique Danielle Pairis-Garcia4Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University (NCSU)Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University (NCSU)Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University (NCSU)Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University (NCSU)Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University (NCSU)Abstract We aimed to compare two assessment methodologies (real-time vs. video-recorded) using the Unesp-Botucatu Pig Composite Acute Pain Scale (UPAPS) in piglets before and after castration. Twenty-nine male piglets were castrated. Four observers scored the UPAPS over three perioperative timepoints of castration following two assessment methodologies. In real-time assessments, the observers were in-person observing the piglets in front of the pen. After two weeks, the observers did video-recorded assessments randomizing piglets and timepoints. Modeling was conducted to compare the UPAPS and each pain-altered behavior between methodologies. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland–Altman, and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were conducted to investigate agreement between methodologies. UPAPS was statistically equivalent between methodologies (P = 0.4371). The ICC for each method was very good (0.85 to 0.91). The agreement of the UPAPS assessed between methodologies had minimal bias (− 0.04), no proportion bias, and 53% of the assessments presented a perfect agreement. However, CCC of the UPAPS was moderate (0.65), and only one pain-altered behavior (“presents difficulty in overcoming obstacles or other animals”) occurred more in real-time assessments (P = 0.0444). In conclusion, piglet pain assessment by UPAPS can be conducted in real-time based on a suitable agreement between the real-time and video-recorded assessment methods.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45869-8
spellingShingle Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade
Magdiel Lopez-Soriano
Victoria Rocha Merenda
Rubia Mitalli Tomacheuski
Monique Danielle Pairis-Garcia
Effects of assessment method (real-time versus video-recorded) on a validated pain-altered behavior scale used in castrated piglets
Scientific Reports
title Effects of assessment method (real-time versus video-recorded) on a validated pain-altered behavior scale used in castrated piglets
title_full Effects of assessment method (real-time versus video-recorded) on a validated pain-altered behavior scale used in castrated piglets
title_fullStr Effects of assessment method (real-time versus video-recorded) on a validated pain-altered behavior scale used in castrated piglets
title_full_unstemmed Effects of assessment method (real-time versus video-recorded) on a validated pain-altered behavior scale used in castrated piglets
title_short Effects of assessment method (real-time versus video-recorded) on a validated pain-altered behavior scale used in castrated piglets
title_sort effects of assessment method real time versus video recorded on a validated pain altered behavior scale used in castrated piglets
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45869-8
work_keys_str_mv AT pedrohenriqueestevestrindade effectsofassessmentmethodrealtimeversusvideorecordedonavalidatedpainalteredbehaviorscaleusedincastratedpiglets
AT magdiellopezsoriano effectsofassessmentmethodrealtimeversusvideorecordedonavalidatedpainalteredbehaviorscaleusedincastratedpiglets
AT victoriarochamerenda effectsofassessmentmethodrealtimeversusvideorecordedonavalidatedpainalteredbehaviorscaleusedincastratedpiglets
AT rubiamitallitomacheuski effectsofassessmentmethodrealtimeversusvideorecordedonavalidatedpainalteredbehaviorscaleusedincastratedpiglets
AT moniquedaniellepairisgarcia effectsofassessmentmethodrealtimeversusvideorecordedonavalidatedpainalteredbehaviorscaleusedincastratedpiglets