APPLICATION OF DIFFERENT LABORATORY METHODS FOR ANTINUCLEAR AUTOANTIBODIES INVESTIGATION IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOIMMUNE CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASES

1222 patients with suspicion of different autoimmune connective tissue diseases are investigated. Antinuclear antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence reaction, by methods of ELISA and immunoblotting were determined. Laboratory tests results correlated with each other that testifies to satisfactory...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I. A. Pashnina, I. M. Krivolapova, I. A. Tuzankina, V. A. Chereshnev
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Scientific Сentre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems 2012-05-01
Series:Acta Biomedica Scientifica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.actabiomedica.ru/jour/article/view/905
_version_ 1797237685008465920
author I. A. Pashnina
I. M. Krivolapova
I. A. Tuzankina
V. A. Chereshnev
author_facet I. A. Pashnina
I. M. Krivolapova
I. A. Tuzankina
V. A. Chereshnev
author_sort I. A. Pashnina
collection DOAJ
description 1222 patients with suspicion of different autoimmune connective tissue diseases are investigated. Antinuclear antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence reaction, by methods of ELISA and immunoblotting were determined. Laboratory tests results correlated with each other that testifies to satisfactory comparability of different laboratory methods. The most sensitive method for detection of antinuclear antibodies is indirect immunofluorescence. This is a preferable method for screening of autoimmune connective tissue diseases. At comparison of luminescence types in immunofluorescence test and results of immunoblotting was shown that for each type of a luminescence the set of antibody, revealed by immunoblotting, was characteristic. However, the same antibodies can be found in various types of fluorescence that complicates unequivocal interpretation of immunofluorescence test results. Antibodies to Ro-52 were most often found in all types of fluorescence, and also in the absence of that.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T12:23:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-559191a0e9af472a837725fbd40564a4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2541-9420
2587-9596
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-24T17:23:40Z
publishDate 2012-05-01
publisher Scientific Сentre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems
record_format Article
series Acta Biomedica Scientifica
spelling doaj.art-559191a0e9af472a837725fbd40564a42024-03-28T07:49:04ZrusScientific Сentre for Family Health and Human Reproduction ProblemsActa Biomedica Scientifica2541-94202587-95962012-05-0103(2)143147851APPLICATION OF DIFFERENT LABORATORY METHODS FOR ANTINUCLEAR AUTOANTIBODIES INVESTIGATION IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOIMMUNE CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASESI. A. Pashnina0I. M. Krivolapova1I. A. Tuzankina2V. A. Chereshnev3Institute of Immunology and Physiology, Urals Branch of the Russian Acad. Sci.Institute of Immunology and Physiology, Urals Branch of the Russian Acad. Sci.Institute of Immunology and Physiology, Urals Branch of the Russian Acad. Sci.Institute of Immunology and Physiology, Urals Branch of the Russian Acad. Sci.1222 patients with suspicion of different autoimmune connective tissue diseases are investigated. Antinuclear antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence reaction, by methods of ELISA and immunoblotting were determined. Laboratory tests results correlated with each other that testifies to satisfactory comparability of different laboratory methods. The most sensitive method for detection of antinuclear antibodies is indirect immunofluorescence. This is a preferable method for screening of autoimmune connective tissue diseases. At comparison of luminescence types in immunofluorescence test and results of immunoblotting was shown that for each type of a luminescence the set of antibody, revealed by immunoblotting, was characteristic. However, the same antibodies can be found in various types of fluorescence that complicates unequivocal interpretation of immunofluorescence test results. Antibodies to Ro-52 were most often found in all types of fluorescence, and also in the absence of that.https://www.actabiomedica.ru/jour/article/view/905autoantibodiesautoimmune diseases
spellingShingle I. A. Pashnina
I. M. Krivolapova
I. A. Tuzankina
V. A. Chereshnev
APPLICATION OF DIFFERENT LABORATORY METHODS FOR ANTINUCLEAR AUTOANTIBODIES INVESTIGATION IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOIMMUNE CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASES
Acta Biomedica Scientifica
autoantibodies
autoimmune diseases
title APPLICATION OF DIFFERENT LABORATORY METHODS FOR ANTINUCLEAR AUTOANTIBODIES INVESTIGATION IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOIMMUNE CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASES
title_full APPLICATION OF DIFFERENT LABORATORY METHODS FOR ANTINUCLEAR AUTOANTIBODIES INVESTIGATION IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOIMMUNE CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASES
title_fullStr APPLICATION OF DIFFERENT LABORATORY METHODS FOR ANTINUCLEAR AUTOANTIBODIES INVESTIGATION IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOIMMUNE CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASES
title_full_unstemmed APPLICATION OF DIFFERENT LABORATORY METHODS FOR ANTINUCLEAR AUTOANTIBODIES INVESTIGATION IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOIMMUNE CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASES
title_short APPLICATION OF DIFFERENT LABORATORY METHODS FOR ANTINUCLEAR AUTOANTIBODIES INVESTIGATION IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOIMMUNE CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASES
title_sort application of different laboratory methods for antinuclear autoantibodies investigation in patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases
topic autoantibodies
autoimmune diseases
url https://www.actabiomedica.ru/jour/article/view/905
work_keys_str_mv AT iapashnina applicationofdifferentlaboratorymethodsforantinuclearautoantibodiesinvestigationinpatientswithautoimmuneconnectivetissuediseases
AT imkrivolapova applicationofdifferentlaboratorymethodsforantinuclearautoantibodiesinvestigationinpatientswithautoimmuneconnectivetissuediseases
AT iatuzankina applicationofdifferentlaboratorymethodsforantinuclearautoantibodiesinvestigationinpatientswithautoimmuneconnectivetissuediseases
AT vachereshnev applicationofdifferentlaboratorymethodsforantinuclearautoantibodiesinvestigationinpatientswithautoimmuneconnectivetissuediseases