Comparison of internal working models between low conflict and high couples in Tehran

Internal working model is the most essential concept in attachment theory that explain adult romantic behavior in marital relationships. This study aimed to compare internal working models between low conflict and high conflict couples in Tehran. The samples include 100 low conflict persons and 100...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: samira hashemi, kiumars farahbakhsh, abolfazl karami
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2023-03-01
Series:Faṣlnāmah-i Farhang Mushavirah va Ravān/Darmānī
Subjects:
Online Access:https://qccpc.atu.ac.ir/article_13922_d7cc6e4220457e15ca9ce737318c7bb2.pdf
_version_ 1797377410893611008
author samira hashemi
kiumars farahbakhsh
abolfazl karami
author_facet samira hashemi
kiumars farahbakhsh
abolfazl karami
author_sort samira hashemi
collection DOAJ
description Internal working model is the most essential concept in attachment theory that explain adult romantic behavior in marital relationships. This study aimed to compare internal working models between low conflict and high conflict couples in Tehran. The samples include 100 low conflict persons and 100 high conflict persons in marital relationships that were randomly selected. The research’s tools were Internal Working Model Questionary (IMWQ) that was made by researcher, and Marital Conflicts Questionary (MCQ). Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), LSD incidental test, and discriminant analysis were used for analysis of the research’s data. The results showed that there is significant difference (p<0/01) between the profiles of internal working models’ components of low conflict and high conflict persons. Also the results indicated that each component of internal working model between low conflict and high conflict persons was significantly different (p<0/01). The discriminant analysis showed that it’s possible to predicate group membership of persons in successful and unsuccessful groups, with 99/5% probability. Then according to findings low conflict couples have secure memories, attitudes, needs, and strategies while high conflicts couples have unsecure memories, attitudes, needs, and strategies.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:52:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-55a077692d49420fb93368b054af9453
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2345-6051
2476-6178
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:52:11Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
record_format Article
series Faṣlnāmah-i Farhang Mushavirah va Ravān/Darmānī
spelling doaj.art-55a077692d49420fb93368b054af94532023-12-24T07:30:24ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University PressFaṣlnāmah-i Farhang Mushavirah va Ravān/Darmānī2345-60512476-61782023-03-01145321523610.22054/qccpc.2022.64742.282613922Comparison of internal working models between low conflict and high couples in Tehransamira hashemi0kiumars farahbakhsh1abolfazl karami2allame tabatabaei universityCounselling, associate professor, faculty of psychology &amp;amp; educational science, Allameh Tabataba&amp;#039;i University, Tehran, Iranدانشگاه علامه طباطباییInternal working model is the most essential concept in attachment theory that explain adult romantic behavior in marital relationships. This study aimed to compare internal working models between low conflict and high conflict couples in Tehran. The samples include 100 low conflict persons and 100 high conflict persons in marital relationships that were randomly selected. The research’s tools were Internal Working Model Questionary (IMWQ) that was made by researcher, and Marital Conflicts Questionary (MCQ). Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), LSD incidental test, and discriminant analysis were used for analysis of the research’s data. The results showed that there is significant difference (p<0/01) between the profiles of internal working models’ components of low conflict and high conflict persons. Also the results indicated that each component of internal working model between low conflict and high conflict persons was significantly different (p<0/01). The discriminant analysis showed that it’s possible to predicate group membership of persons in successful and unsuccessful groups, with 99/5% probability. Then according to findings low conflict couples have secure memories, attitudes, needs, and strategies while high conflicts couples have unsecure memories, attitudes, needs, and strategies.https://qccpc.atu.ac.ir/article_13922_d7cc6e4220457e15ca9ce737318c7bb2.pdfinternal working modelslow conflict coupleshigh conflict couples
spellingShingle samira hashemi
kiumars farahbakhsh
abolfazl karami
Comparison of internal working models between low conflict and high couples in Tehran
Faṣlnāmah-i Farhang Mushavirah va Ravān/Darmānī
internal working models
low conflict couples
high conflict couples
title Comparison of internal working models between low conflict and high couples in Tehran
title_full Comparison of internal working models between low conflict and high couples in Tehran
title_fullStr Comparison of internal working models between low conflict and high couples in Tehran
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of internal working models between low conflict and high couples in Tehran
title_short Comparison of internal working models between low conflict and high couples in Tehran
title_sort comparison of internal working models between low conflict and high couples in tehran
topic internal working models
low conflict couples
high conflict couples
url https://qccpc.atu.ac.ir/article_13922_d7cc6e4220457e15ca9ce737318c7bb2.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT samirahashemi comparisonofinternalworkingmodelsbetweenlowconflictandhighcouplesintehran
AT kiumarsfarahbakhsh comparisonofinternalworkingmodelsbetweenlowconflictandhighcouplesintehran
AT abolfazlkarami comparisonofinternalworkingmodelsbetweenlowconflictandhighcouplesintehran