“They’re Not Going to Do Nothing for Me”: Research Participants’ Attitudes towards Elective Genetic Counseling

As applications of genomic sequencing have expanded, offering genetic counseling support to all patients is arguably no longer practical. Additionally, whether individuals desire and value genetic counseling services for genomic screening is unclear. We offered elective genetic counseling to 5110 in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erica J. Sutton, Annika T. Beck, Kylie O. Gamm, Jennifer B. McCormick, Iftikhar J. Kullo, Richard R. Sharp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Journal of Personalized Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/10/4/143
_version_ 1797552686617329664
author Erica J. Sutton
Annika T. Beck
Kylie O. Gamm
Jennifer B. McCormick
Iftikhar J. Kullo
Richard R. Sharp
author_facet Erica J. Sutton
Annika T. Beck
Kylie O. Gamm
Jennifer B. McCormick
Iftikhar J. Kullo
Richard R. Sharp
author_sort Erica J. Sutton
collection DOAJ
description As applications of genomic sequencing have expanded, offering genetic counseling support to all patients is arguably no longer practical. Additionally, whether individuals desire and value genetic counseling services for genomic screening is unclear. We offered elective genetic counseling to 5110 individuals prior to undergoing sequencing and 2310 participants who received neutral results to assess demand. A total of 0.2% of the study participants accessed genetic counseling services prior to sequencing, and 0.3% reached out after receiving neutral results. We later conducted 50 interviews with participants to understand why they did not access these services. Many interviewees did not recall the availability of genetic counseling and were unfamiliar with the profession. Interviewees described not needing counseling before sequencing because they understood the study and felt that they could cope with any result. Counseling was considered equally unnecessary after learning neutral results. Although the participants had questions about their results, they did not feel that speaking with a genetic counselor would be helpful. Genomic screening efforts that employ opt-in models of genetic counseling may need to clarify the potential value of genetic counseling support from the outset and feature genetic counseling services more prominently in program materials.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T16:04:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-55cba4076c3d444d8490533f57b96184
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4426
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T16:04:38Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Personalized Medicine
spelling doaj.art-55cba4076c3d444d8490533f57b961842023-11-20T14:59:47ZengMDPI AGJournal of Personalized Medicine2075-44262020-09-0110414310.3390/jpm10040143“They’re Not Going to Do Nothing for Me”: Research Participants’ Attitudes towards Elective Genetic CounselingErica J. Sutton0Annika T. Beck1Kylie O. Gamm2Jennifer B. McCormick3Iftikhar J. Kullo4Richard R. Sharp5Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USABiomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USADepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USACollege of Medicine, Department of Humanities, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA 17033, USADivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USABiomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USAAs applications of genomic sequencing have expanded, offering genetic counseling support to all patients is arguably no longer practical. Additionally, whether individuals desire and value genetic counseling services for genomic screening is unclear. We offered elective genetic counseling to 5110 individuals prior to undergoing sequencing and 2310 participants who received neutral results to assess demand. A total of 0.2% of the study participants accessed genetic counseling services prior to sequencing, and 0.3% reached out after receiving neutral results. We later conducted 50 interviews with participants to understand why they did not access these services. Many interviewees did not recall the availability of genetic counseling and were unfamiliar with the profession. Interviewees described not needing counseling before sequencing because they understood the study and felt that they could cope with any result. Counseling was considered equally unnecessary after learning neutral results. Although the participants had questions about their results, they did not feel that speaking with a genetic counselor would be helpful. Genomic screening efforts that employ opt-in models of genetic counseling may need to clarify the potential value of genetic counseling support from the outset and feature genetic counseling services more prominently in program materials.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/10/4/143genomic sequencinggenetic counselinginformed consentpatient communicationreturn of resultsethical
spellingShingle Erica J. Sutton
Annika T. Beck
Kylie O. Gamm
Jennifer B. McCormick
Iftikhar J. Kullo
Richard R. Sharp
“They’re Not Going to Do Nothing for Me”: Research Participants’ Attitudes towards Elective Genetic Counseling
Journal of Personalized Medicine
genomic sequencing
genetic counseling
informed consent
patient communication
return of results
ethical
title “They’re Not Going to Do Nothing for Me”: Research Participants’ Attitudes towards Elective Genetic Counseling
title_full “They’re Not Going to Do Nothing for Me”: Research Participants’ Attitudes towards Elective Genetic Counseling
title_fullStr “They’re Not Going to Do Nothing for Me”: Research Participants’ Attitudes towards Elective Genetic Counseling
title_full_unstemmed “They’re Not Going to Do Nothing for Me”: Research Participants’ Attitudes towards Elective Genetic Counseling
title_short “They’re Not Going to Do Nothing for Me”: Research Participants’ Attitudes towards Elective Genetic Counseling
title_sort they re not going to do nothing for me research participants attitudes towards elective genetic counseling
topic genomic sequencing
genetic counseling
informed consent
patient communication
return of results
ethical
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/10/4/143
work_keys_str_mv AT ericajsutton theyrenotgoingtodonothingformeresearchparticipantsattitudestowardselectivegeneticcounseling
AT annikatbeck theyrenotgoingtodonothingformeresearchparticipantsattitudestowardselectivegeneticcounseling
AT kylieogamm theyrenotgoingtodonothingformeresearchparticipantsattitudestowardselectivegeneticcounseling
AT jenniferbmccormick theyrenotgoingtodonothingformeresearchparticipantsattitudestowardselectivegeneticcounseling
AT iftikharjkullo theyrenotgoingtodonothingformeresearchparticipantsattitudestowardselectivegeneticcounseling
AT richardrsharp theyrenotgoingtodonothingformeresearchparticipantsattitudestowardselectivegeneticcounseling