Influences of Satellite Sensor and Scale on Derivation of Ecosystem Functional Types and Diversity

Satellite-derived Ecosystem Functional Types (EFTs) are increasingly used in ecology and conservation to characterize ecosystem heterogeneity. The diversity of EFTs, also known as Ecosystem Functional Diversity (EFD), has been suggested both as a potential metric of ecosystem-level biodiversity and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lingling Liu, Jeffrey R. Smith, Amanda H. Armstrong, Domingo Alcaraz-Segura, Howard E. Epstein, Alejandra Echeverri, Kelley E. Langhans, Rafael J. P. Schmitt, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-12-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/23/5593
_version_ 1797399634927157248
author Lingling Liu
Jeffrey R. Smith
Amanda H. Armstrong
Domingo Alcaraz-Segura
Howard E. Epstein
Alejandra Echeverri
Kelley E. Langhans
Rafael J. P. Schmitt
Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer
author_facet Lingling Liu
Jeffrey R. Smith
Amanda H. Armstrong
Domingo Alcaraz-Segura
Howard E. Epstein
Alejandra Echeverri
Kelley E. Langhans
Rafael J. P. Schmitt
Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer
author_sort Lingling Liu
collection DOAJ
description Satellite-derived Ecosystem Functional Types (EFTs) are increasingly used in ecology and conservation to characterize ecosystem heterogeneity. The diversity of EFTs, also known as Ecosystem Functional Diversity (EFD), has been suggested both as a potential metric of ecosystem-level biodiversity and as a predictor for ecosystem functioning, ecosystem services, and resilience. However, the impact of key methodological choices on patterns of EFTs and EFD have not been formally assessed. Using Costa Rica as a study system, we compared EFTs and EFD, derived from MODIS and Landsat data using different methodological assumptions, at both national and local extents. Our results showed that the regional spatial patterns of EFTs and EFD derived from 250 m MODIS and 30 m Landsat are notably different. The selection of sensors for deriving EFTs and EFD is dependent on the study area, data quality, and the research objective. Given its finer spatial resolution, Landsat has greater capacity to differentiate more EFTs than MODIS, though MODIS could be a better choice in frequently cloudy areas due to its shorter revisiting time. We also found that the selection of spatial extent used to derive EFD is critical, as smaller extents (e.g., at a local rather than a national scale) can show much higher diversity. However, diversity levels derived at smaller extents appear to be nested within the diversity levels derived at larger extents. As EFTs and EFD continue to develop as a tool for ecosystem ecology, we highlight the important methodological choices to ensure that these metrics best fit research objectives.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T01:42:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-55cfaa2096a44ee59b36588af8928555
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T01:42:57Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-55cfaa2096a44ee59b36588af89285552023-12-08T15:25:10ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922023-12-011523559310.3390/rs15235593Influences of Satellite Sensor and Scale on Derivation of Ecosystem Functional Types and DiversityLingling Liu0Jeffrey R. Smith1Amanda H. Armstrong2Domingo Alcaraz-Segura3Howard E. Epstein4Alejandra Echeverri5Kelley E. Langhans6Rafael J. P. Schmitt7Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer8Institute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MI 55108, USADepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USADepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USAi-Ecolab, Inter-University Institute for Earth System Research in Andalusia, University of Granada, 18012 Granada, SpainDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USADepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USADepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USANatural Capital Project, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USAGlobal Science, WWF, 131 Steuart St., San Francisco, CA 94105, USASatellite-derived Ecosystem Functional Types (EFTs) are increasingly used in ecology and conservation to characterize ecosystem heterogeneity. The diversity of EFTs, also known as Ecosystem Functional Diversity (EFD), has been suggested both as a potential metric of ecosystem-level biodiversity and as a predictor for ecosystem functioning, ecosystem services, and resilience. However, the impact of key methodological choices on patterns of EFTs and EFD have not been formally assessed. Using Costa Rica as a study system, we compared EFTs and EFD, derived from MODIS and Landsat data using different methodological assumptions, at both national and local extents. Our results showed that the regional spatial patterns of EFTs and EFD derived from 250 m MODIS and 30 m Landsat are notably different. The selection of sensors for deriving EFTs and EFD is dependent on the study area, data quality, and the research objective. Given its finer spatial resolution, Landsat has greater capacity to differentiate more EFTs than MODIS, though MODIS could be a better choice in frequently cloudy areas due to its shorter revisiting time. We also found that the selection of spatial extent used to derive EFD is critical, as smaller extents (e.g., at a local rather than a national scale) can show much higher diversity. However, diversity levels derived at smaller extents appear to be nested within the diversity levels derived at larger extents. As EFTs and EFD continue to develop as a tool for ecosystem ecology, we highlight the important methodological choices to ensure that these metrics best fit research objectives.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/23/5593ecosystem functional typeecosystem functional diversityecosystem serviceLandsatMODISspatial resolution
spellingShingle Lingling Liu
Jeffrey R. Smith
Amanda H. Armstrong
Domingo Alcaraz-Segura
Howard E. Epstein
Alejandra Echeverri
Kelley E. Langhans
Rafael J. P. Schmitt
Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer
Influences of Satellite Sensor and Scale on Derivation of Ecosystem Functional Types and Diversity
Remote Sensing
ecosystem functional type
ecosystem functional diversity
ecosystem service
Landsat
MODIS
spatial resolution
title Influences of Satellite Sensor and Scale on Derivation of Ecosystem Functional Types and Diversity
title_full Influences of Satellite Sensor and Scale on Derivation of Ecosystem Functional Types and Diversity
title_fullStr Influences of Satellite Sensor and Scale on Derivation of Ecosystem Functional Types and Diversity
title_full_unstemmed Influences of Satellite Sensor and Scale on Derivation of Ecosystem Functional Types and Diversity
title_short Influences of Satellite Sensor and Scale on Derivation of Ecosystem Functional Types and Diversity
title_sort influences of satellite sensor and scale on derivation of ecosystem functional types and diversity
topic ecosystem functional type
ecosystem functional diversity
ecosystem service
Landsat
MODIS
spatial resolution
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/23/5593
work_keys_str_mv AT linglingliu influencesofsatellitesensorandscaleonderivationofecosystemfunctionaltypesanddiversity
AT jeffreyrsmith influencesofsatellitesensorandscaleonderivationofecosystemfunctionaltypesanddiversity
AT amandaharmstrong influencesofsatellitesensorandscaleonderivationofecosystemfunctionaltypesanddiversity
AT domingoalcarazsegura influencesofsatellitesensorandscaleonderivationofecosystemfunctionaltypesanddiversity
AT howardeepstein influencesofsatellitesensorandscaleonderivationofecosystemfunctionaltypesanddiversity
AT alejandraecheverri influencesofsatellitesensorandscaleonderivationofecosystemfunctionaltypesanddiversity
AT kelleyelanghans influencesofsatellitesensorandscaleonderivationofecosystemfunctionaltypesanddiversity
AT rafaeljpschmitt influencesofsatellitesensorandscaleonderivationofecosystemfunctionaltypesanddiversity
AT rebeccachaplinkramer influencesofsatellitesensorandscaleonderivationofecosystemfunctionaltypesanddiversity