Propensity score-matched analysis comparing perioperative, functional, and safety outcomes between thulium fiber laser and bipolar enucleation of the prostate performed by a single surgeon with two years of follow-up

Purpose: To compare perioperative, functional, and safety outcomes between thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) and bipolar enucleation of the prostate performed by a single surgeon with use of propensity score (PS)-matched analysis. Materials and Methods: Data were from 675 pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Armais Albertovich Kamalov, Nikolay Ivanovich Sorokin, Vitaly Kazichanovich Dzitiev, Andrey Alekseevich Strigunov, Olga Yurevna Nesterova, Ilya Vladimirovich Bondar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Urological Association 2024-03-01
Series:Investigative and Clinical Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.icurology.org/pdf/10.4111/icu.20230270
_version_ 1797271453262938112
author Armais Albertovich Kamalov
Nikolay Ivanovich Sorokin
Vitaly Kazichanovich Dzitiev
Andrey Alekseevich Strigunov
Olga Yurevna Nesterova
Ilya Vladimirovich Bondar
author_facet Armais Albertovich Kamalov
Nikolay Ivanovich Sorokin
Vitaly Kazichanovich Dzitiev
Andrey Alekseevich Strigunov
Olga Yurevna Nesterova
Ilya Vladimirovich Bondar
author_sort Armais Albertovich Kamalov
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: To compare perioperative, functional, and safety outcomes between thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) and bipolar enucleation of the prostate performed by a single surgeon with use of propensity score (PS)-matched analysis. Materials and Methods: Data were from 675 patients, 422 of whom underwent ThuFLEP and bipolar enucleation by a single highly experienced surgeon. ThuFLEP was performed with Fiberlase U1 (IRE Polus Ltd.). Perioperative parameters, safety, and functional outcomes, such as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), postvoid residual volume (PVR), and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) were assessed. To control for selection bias, a 1:1 PS-matched analysis was carried out using the following variables as covariates: total prostate volume, preoperative IPSS and early sphincter release. Results: Of 422 patients, 370 (87.7%) underwent ThuFLEP and 52 (12.3%) underwent bipolar enucleation. Operation, enucleation, and morcellation time were comparable between groups before and after PS-matched analysis (p=0.954, p=0.474, p=0.362, respectively). Functional parameters (IPSS, QoL, PVR, Qmax) were also comparable between groups at every time point before and after PS matching. Significant improvements in IPSS, QoL score, Qmax, and PVR were observed during the 24-month follow-up period for both ThuFLEP and bipolar enucleation without any significant differences between groups. Early and late postoperative complications before and after PS-matched analysis were similar. Conclusions: ThuFLEP was comparable to bipolar enucleation in perioperative characteristics, improvement in voiding parameters, and complication rates. Both procedures were shown to be effective and safe in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:02:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-55d4c5b6e63e49dcb10ff977ebcc0b17
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2466-0493
2466-054X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:02:57Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Korean Urological Association
record_format Article
series Investigative and Clinical Urology
spelling doaj.art-55d4c5b6e63e49dcb10ff977ebcc0b172024-03-07T04:34:24ZengKorean Urological AssociationInvestigative and Clinical Urology2466-04932466-054X2024-03-0165213914710.4111/icu.20230270Propensity score-matched analysis comparing perioperative, functional, and safety outcomes between thulium fiber laser and bipolar enucleation of the prostate performed by a single surgeon with two years of follow-upArmais Albertovich Kamalov0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4251-7545Nikolay Ivanovich Sorokin1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9466-7567Vitaly Kazichanovich Dzitiev2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7558-589XAndrey Alekseevich Strigunov3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4518-634XOlga Yurevna Nesterova4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3355-4547Ilya Vladimirovich Bondar5https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7079-2434Department of Urology and Andrology, Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation.Department of Urology and Andrology, Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation.Department of Urology and Andrology, Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation.Department of Urology and Andrology, Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation.Department of Urology and Andrology, Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation.Department of Urology and Andrology, Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation.Purpose: To compare perioperative, functional, and safety outcomes between thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) and bipolar enucleation of the prostate performed by a single surgeon with use of propensity score (PS)-matched analysis. Materials and Methods: Data were from 675 patients, 422 of whom underwent ThuFLEP and bipolar enucleation by a single highly experienced surgeon. ThuFLEP was performed with Fiberlase U1 (IRE Polus Ltd.). Perioperative parameters, safety, and functional outcomes, such as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), postvoid residual volume (PVR), and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) were assessed. To control for selection bias, a 1:1 PS-matched analysis was carried out using the following variables as covariates: total prostate volume, preoperative IPSS and early sphincter release. Results: Of 422 patients, 370 (87.7%) underwent ThuFLEP and 52 (12.3%) underwent bipolar enucleation. Operation, enucleation, and morcellation time were comparable between groups before and after PS-matched analysis (p=0.954, p=0.474, p=0.362, respectively). Functional parameters (IPSS, QoL, PVR, Qmax) were also comparable between groups at every time point before and after PS matching. Significant improvements in IPSS, QoL score, Qmax, and PVR were observed during the 24-month follow-up period for both ThuFLEP and bipolar enucleation without any significant differences between groups. Early and late postoperative complications before and after PS-matched analysis were similar. Conclusions: ThuFLEP was comparable to bipolar enucleation in perioperative characteristics, improvement in voiding parameters, and complication rates. Both procedures were shown to be effective and safe in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.https://www.icurology.org/pdf/10.4111/icu.20230270benign prostatic hyperplasiaminimally invasive surgical procedurepropensity scorethulium
spellingShingle Armais Albertovich Kamalov
Nikolay Ivanovich Sorokin
Vitaly Kazichanovich Dzitiev
Andrey Alekseevich Strigunov
Olga Yurevna Nesterova
Ilya Vladimirovich Bondar
Propensity score-matched analysis comparing perioperative, functional, and safety outcomes between thulium fiber laser and bipolar enucleation of the prostate performed by a single surgeon with two years of follow-up
Investigative and Clinical Urology
benign prostatic hyperplasia
minimally invasive surgical procedure
propensity score
thulium
title Propensity score-matched analysis comparing perioperative, functional, and safety outcomes between thulium fiber laser and bipolar enucleation of the prostate performed by a single surgeon with two years of follow-up
title_full Propensity score-matched analysis comparing perioperative, functional, and safety outcomes between thulium fiber laser and bipolar enucleation of the prostate performed by a single surgeon with two years of follow-up
title_fullStr Propensity score-matched analysis comparing perioperative, functional, and safety outcomes between thulium fiber laser and bipolar enucleation of the prostate performed by a single surgeon with two years of follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Propensity score-matched analysis comparing perioperative, functional, and safety outcomes between thulium fiber laser and bipolar enucleation of the prostate performed by a single surgeon with two years of follow-up
title_short Propensity score-matched analysis comparing perioperative, functional, and safety outcomes between thulium fiber laser and bipolar enucleation of the prostate performed by a single surgeon with two years of follow-up
title_sort propensity score matched analysis comparing perioperative functional and safety outcomes between thulium fiber laser and bipolar enucleation of the prostate performed by a single surgeon with two years of follow up
topic benign prostatic hyperplasia
minimally invasive surgical procedure
propensity score
thulium
url https://www.icurology.org/pdf/10.4111/icu.20230270
work_keys_str_mv AT armaisalbertovichkamalov propensityscorematchedanalysiscomparingperioperativefunctionalandsafetyoutcomesbetweenthuliumfiberlaserandbipolarenucleationoftheprostateperformedbyasinglesurgeonwithtwoyearsoffollowup
AT nikolayivanovichsorokin propensityscorematchedanalysiscomparingperioperativefunctionalandsafetyoutcomesbetweenthuliumfiberlaserandbipolarenucleationoftheprostateperformedbyasinglesurgeonwithtwoyearsoffollowup
AT vitalykazichanovichdzitiev propensityscorematchedanalysiscomparingperioperativefunctionalandsafetyoutcomesbetweenthuliumfiberlaserandbipolarenucleationoftheprostateperformedbyasinglesurgeonwithtwoyearsoffollowup
AT andreyalekseevichstrigunov propensityscorematchedanalysiscomparingperioperativefunctionalandsafetyoutcomesbetweenthuliumfiberlaserandbipolarenucleationoftheprostateperformedbyasinglesurgeonwithtwoyearsoffollowup
AT olgayurevnanesterova propensityscorematchedanalysiscomparingperioperativefunctionalandsafetyoutcomesbetweenthuliumfiberlaserandbipolarenucleationoftheprostateperformedbyasinglesurgeonwithtwoyearsoffollowup
AT ilyavladimirovichbondar propensityscorematchedanalysiscomparingperioperativefunctionalandsafetyoutcomesbetweenthuliumfiberlaserandbipolarenucleationoftheprostateperformedbyasinglesurgeonwithtwoyearsoffollowup