Benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: Results from a cross‐sectional survey

Abstract Background and Aims Mental health institutions and community organizations have had difficulty recruiting patients and caregivers onto their Patient, Family, and Community Advisory Committees (PFACs). Previous research has focused on barriers and enablers of engaging patients and caregivers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cynthia Clark, Alexis Dorland, Natalia Jaworska, Robyn J. McQuaid, Michèle Langlois, Florence Dzierszinski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-02-01
Series:Health Science Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1114
_version_ 1797772385945911296
author Cynthia Clark
Alexis Dorland
Natalia Jaworska
Robyn J. McQuaid
Michèle Langlois
Florence Dzierszinski
author_facet Cynthia Clark
Alexis Dorland
Natalia Jaworska
Robyn J. McQuaid
Michèle Langlois
Florence Dzierszinski
author_sort Cynthia Clark
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background and Aims Mental health institutions and community organizations have had difficulty recruiting patients and caregivers onto their Patient, Family, and Community Advisory Committees (PFACs). Previous research has focused on barriers and enablers of engaging patients and caregivers who have advisory experience. This study acknowledges the experiential difference between patients and caregivers by focusing only on caregivers; further, we compare the barriers and enablers between advising versus non‐advising caregivers of loved ones with mental illness. Methods Data from a cross‐sectional survey codesigned by researchers, staff, clients, and caregiver affiliated with a tertiary mental health center were completed by n = 84 caregivers (n = 40 past/current PFAC advising caregivers; n = 44 non‐advising caregivers). Results Caregivers were disproportionately female and late middle‐aged. Advising and non‐advising caregivers differed on employment status. There were no differences of the demographics of their care‐recipients. More non‐advising caregivers reported being hindered from PFAC engagement by family‐related duties and interpersonal demands. Finally, more advising caregivers considered being publicly acknowledged as important. Conclusions Advising and non‐advising caregivers of loved ones with mental illness were similar in demographics and in reporting the enablers and hindrances that impact PFAC engagement. Nevertheless, our data highlights specific considerations that institutions/organizations should consider when recruiting and retaining caregivers on PFACs. Patient or Public Contribution This project was led by a caregiver advisor to address a need she saw in the community. The surveys were codesigned by a team of two caregivers, one patient, and one researcher. The surveys were reviewed by a group of five caregivers external to the project. The results of the surveys were discussed with two caregivers involved directly with the project.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T21:51:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-55db023ab69a4f5293520761db36bc36
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2398-8835
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T21:51:06Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Health Science Reports
spelling doaj.art-55db023ab69a4f5293520761db36bc362023-07-26T04:06:15ZengWileyHealth Science Reports2398-88352023-02-0162n/an/a10.1002/hsr2.1114Benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: Results from a cross‐sectional surveyCynthia Clark0Alexis Dorland1Natalia Jaworska2Robyn J. McQuaid3Michèle Langlois4Florence Dzierszinski5Institute of Mental Health Research University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario CanadaInstitute of Mental Health Research University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario CanadaInstitute of Mental Health Research University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario CanadaInstitute of Mental Health Research University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario CanadaThe Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre Ottawa Ontario CanadaInstitute of Mental Health Research University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario CanadaAbstract Background and Aims Mental health institutions and community organizations have had difficulty recruiting patients and caregivers onto their Patient, Family, and Community Advisory Committees (PFACs). Previous research has focused on barriers and enablers of engaging patients and caregivers who have advisory experience. This study acknowledges the experiential difference between patients and caregivers by focusing only on caregivers; further, we compare the barriers and enablers between advising versus non‐advising caregivers of loved ones with mental illness. Methods Data from a cross‐sectional survey codesigned by researchers, staff, clients, and caregiver affiliated with a tertiary mental health center were completed by n = 84 caregivers (n = 40 past/current PFAC advising caregivers; n = 44 non‐advising caregivers). Results Caregivers were disproportionately female and late middle‐aged. Advising and non‐advising caregivers differed on employment status. There were no differences of the demographics of their care‐recipients. More non‐advising caregivers reported being hindered from PFAC engagement by family‐related duties and interpersonal demands. Finally, more advising caregivers considered being publicly acknowledged as important. Conclusions Advising and non‐advising caregivers of loved ones with mental illness were similar in demographics and in reporting the enablers and hindrances that impact PFAC engagement. Nevertheless, our data highlights specific considerations that institutions/organizations should consider when recruiting and retaining caregivers on PFACs. Patient or Public Contribution This project was led by a caregiver advisor to address a need she saw in the community. The surveys were codesigned by a team of two caregivers, one patient, and one researcher. The surveys were reviewed by a group of five caregivers external to the project. The results of the surveys were discussed with two caregivers involved directly with the project.https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1114advisorcaregivercouncilfamily advisory councilmenth health
spellingShingle Cynthia Clark
Alexis Dorland
Natalia Jaworska
Robyn J. McQuaid
Michèle Langlois
Florence Dzierszinski
Benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: Results from a cross‐sectional survey
Health Science Reports
advisor
caregiver
council
family advisory council
menth health
title Benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: Results from a cross‐sectional survey
title_full Benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: Results from a cross‐sectional survey
title_fullStr Benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: Results from a cross‐sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: Results from a cross‐sectional survey
title_short Benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: Results from a cross‐sectional survey
title_sort benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles results from a cross sectional survey
topic advisor
caregiver
council
family advisory council
menth health
url https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1114
work_keys_str_mv AT cynthiaclark benefitsandbarrierstoengagementofmentalhealthcaregiversinadvisoryrolesresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT alexisdorland benefitsandbarrierstoengagementofmentalhealthcaregiversinadvisoryrolesresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT nataliajaworska benefitsandbarrierstoengagementofmentalhealthcaregiversinadvisoryrolesresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT robynjmcquaid benefitsandbarrierstoengagementofmentalhealthcaregiversinadvisoryrolesresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT michelelanglois benefitsandbarrierstoengagementofmentalhealthcaregiversinadvisoryrolesresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT florencedzierszinski benefitsandbarrierstoengagementofmentalhealthcaregiversinadvisoryrolesresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey