The relationship between perseverative thinking, proactive control, and inhibition in psychological distress: a study in a women’s cohort

Abstract Cognitive control is a core feature of several mental disorders. A recent account poses that health problems may derive from proactive forms of cognitive control that maintain stress representation over time. The working hypothesis of the present study is that psychological distress is caus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lorenzo Mattioni, Marcantonio M. Spada, Francesca Ferri, Carlo Sestieri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-11-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46713-9
_version_ 1797630233472401408
author Lorenzo Mattioni
Marcantonio M. Spada
Francesca Ferri
Carlo Sestieri
author_facet Lorenzo Mattioni
Marcantonio M. Spada
Francesca Ferri
Carlo Sestieri
author_sort Lorenzo Mattioni
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Cognitive control is a core feature of several mental disorders. A recent account poses that health problems may derive from proactive forms of cognitive control that maintain stress representation over time. The working hypothesis of the present study is that psychological distress is caused by the tendency to select a particular maladaptive self-regulation strategy over time, namely perseverative thinking, rather than by transient stimulus–response patterns. To test this hypothesis, we asked 84 women to carry out a battery of standardized questionnaires regarding their tendency to undertake perseverative thinking and their level of psychological distress, followed by cognitive tasks measuring the tendency to use proactive versus reactive control modality and disinhibition. Through a series of mediation analyses, we demonstrate that the tendency to use proactive control correlates with psychological distress and that this relation is mediated by perseverative thinking. Moreover, we show that the relation between low inhibitory control and psychological stress is more strongly mediated by perseverative thinking than impulsiveness, a classical construct that focuses on more transient reactions to stimuli. The present results underline the importance of considering psychological distress as the consequence of a maladaptive way of applying control over time, rather than the result of a general deficit in cognitive control abilities.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T11:05:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-55e26592c2074259b301730d1e0c671d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T11:05:17Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-55e26592c2074259b301730d1e0c671d2023-11-12T12:16:40ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-11-0113111310.1038/s41598-023-46713-9The relationship between perseverative thinking, proactive control, and inhibition in psychological distress: a study in a women’s cohortLorenzo Mattioni0Marcantonio M. Spada1Francesca Ferri2Carlo Sestieri3Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences - and ITAB, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, University G. d’Annunzio di Chieti-PescaraSchool of Applied Sciences, London South Bank UniversityDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences - and ITAB, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, University G. d’Annunzio di Chieti-PescaraDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences - and ITAB, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, University G. d’Annunzio di Chieti-PescaraAbstract Cognitive control is a core feature of several mental disorders. A recent account poses that health problems may derive from proactive forms of cognitive control that maintain stress representation over time. The working hypothesis of the present study is that psychological distress is caused by the tendency to select a particular maladaptive self-regulation strategy over time, namely perseverative thinking, rather than by transient stimulus–response patterns. To test this hypothesis, we asked 84 women to carry out a battery of standardized questionnaires regarding their tendency to undertake perseverative thinking and their level of psychological distress, followed by cognitive tasks measuring the tendency to use proactive versus reactive control modality and disinhibition. Through a series of mediation analyses, we demonstrate that the tendency to use proactive control correlates with psychological distress and that this relation is mediated by perseverative thinking. Moreover, we show that the relation between low inhibitory control and psychological stress is more strongly mediated by perseverative thinking than impulsiveness, a classical construct that focuses on more transient reactions to stimuli. The present results underline the importance of considering psychological distress as the consequence of a maladaptive way of applying control over time, rather than the result of a general deficit in cognitive control abilities.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46713-9
spellingShingle Lorenzo Mattioni
Marcantonio M. Spada
Francesca Ferri
Carlo Sestieri
The relationship between perseverative thinking, proactive control, and inhibition in psychological distress: a study in a women’s cohort
Scientific Reports
title The relationship between perseverative thinking, proactive control, and inhibition in psychological distress: a study in a women’s cohort
title_full The relationship between perseverative thinking, proactive control, and inhibition in psychological distress: a study in a women’s cohort
title_fullStr The relationship between perseverative thinking, proactive control, and inhibition in psychological distress: a study in a women’s cohort
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between perseverative thinking, proactive control, and inhibition in psychological distress: a study in a women’s cohort
title_short The relationship between perseverative thinking, proactive control, and inhibition in psychological distress: a study in a women’s cohort
title_sort relationship between perseverative thinking proactive control and inhibition in psychological distress a study in a women s cohort
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46713-9
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenzomattioni therelationshipbetweenperseverativethinkingproactivecontrolandinhibitioninpsychologicaldistressastudyinawomenscohort
AT marcantoniomspada therelationshipbetweenperseverativethinkingproactivecontrolandinhibitioninpsychologicaldistressastudyinawomenscohort
AT francescaferri therelationshipbetweenperseverativethinkingproactivecontrolandinhibitioninpsychologicaldistressastudyinawomenscohort
AT carlosestieri therelationshipbetweenperseverativethinkingproactivecontrolandinhibitioninpsychologicaldistressastudyinawomenscohort
AT lorenzomattioni relationshipbetweenperseverativethinkingproactivecontrolandinhibitioninpsychologicaldistressastudyinawomenscohort
AT marcantoniomspada relationshipbetweenperseverativethinkingproactivecontrolandinhibitioninpsychologicaldistressastudyinawomenscohort
AT francescaferri relationshipbetweenperseverativethinkingproactivecontrolandinhibitioninpsychologicaldistressastudyinawomenscohort
AT carlosestieri relationshipbetweenperseverativethinkingproactivecontrolandinhibitioninpsychologicaldistressastudyinawomenscohort