Evaluation of Protein Adsorption and Osseointegration Potential of Polyetheretherketone versus Titanium Dental Implants: A Systematic Review

Introduction: The success of implant therapy depends on a number of parameters, including bone volume implant shape, surface topography, the patient’s overall health, and local factors. Despite the fact that polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants have undergone a lot of alterations, only a small n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seema Patil, Paresh Gandhi, Aditi Kanitkar, Rupali Patil, Bhagyashree Kalsekar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2023-10-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/18557/66902_CE[Ra1]_F(SS)_PF1(KB_OM)_PFA(KB_KM)_PN(KM).pdf
_version_ 1797649152369229824
author Seema Patil
Paresh Gandhi
Aditi Kanitkar
Rupali Patil
Bhagyashree Kalsekar
author_facet Seema Patil
Paresh Gandhi
Aditi Kanitkar
Rupali Patil
Bhagyashree Kalsekar
author_sort Seema Patil
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The success of implant therapy depends on a number of parameters, including bone volume implant shape, surface topography, the patient’s overall health, and local factors. Despite the fact that polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants have undergone a lot of alterations, only a small number of studies have examined the bioactivity and osseointegration of PEEK implants with titanium. Aim: To summarise and evaluate protein adsorption and osseointegration capacity of PEEK and titanium dental implants. Materials and Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used and PROSPERO (CRD42023415494) registration was done. Electronic databases were searched for studies assessing the outcome in terms of protein adsorption and osseointegration capacity of PEEK and titanium dental implants. Quality assessment of included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results: Depending on inclusion and exclusion criteria, seven studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in qualitative synthesis. Risk of bias assessment revealed that all the included studies were largely comparable in methodological quality. All the included studies had moderate to low-risk of bias with all the respective domains. All the included studies revealed that PEEK with optimal surface roughness might hold great potential for protein adsorption and osseointegration capacity. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, it was found that compared to titanium, PEEK is less osseoconductive and bioactive. PEEK is therefore unsuitable for use as a dental implant in its unmodified form. Implantitis and implant failure occurs from improper osseoconductivity and bioactivity of dental implants.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T15:42:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-55e4f249020d4887a0a85ff88159d938
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T15:42:07Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj.art-55e4f249020d4887a0a85ff88159d9382023-10-26T11:20:01ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2023-10-011710131710.7860/JCDR/2023/66902.18557Evaluation of Protein Adsorption and Osseointegration Potential of Polyetheretherketone versus Titanium Dental Implants: A Systematic ReviewSeema Patil0Paresh Gandhi1Aditi Kanitkar2Rupali Patil3Bhagyashree Kalsekar4Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, BVDU, DCH, Pune, Maharashtra, India.Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, BVDU, DCH, Pune, Maharashtra, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, BVDU, DCH, Pune, Maharashtra, India.Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, BVDU, DCH, Pune, Maharashtra, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, BVDU, DCH, Pune, Maharashtra, India.Introduction: The success of implant therapy depends on a number of parameters, including bone volume implant shape, surface topography, the patient’s overall health, and local factors. Despite the fact that polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants have undergone a lot of alterations, only a small number of studies have examined the bioactivity and osseointegration of PEEK implants with titanium. Aim: To summarise and evaluate protein adsorption and osseointegration capacity of PEEK and titanium dental implants. Materials and Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used and PROSPERO (CRD42023415494) registration was done. Electronic databases were searched for studies assessing the outcome in terms of protein adsorption and osseointegration capacity of PEEK and titanium dental implants. Quality assessment of included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results: Depending on inclusion and exclusion criteria, seven studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in qualitative synthesis. Risk of bias assessment revealed that all the included studies were largely comparable in methodological quality. All the included studies had moderate to low-risk of bias with all the respective domains. All the included studies revealed that PEEK with optimal surface roughness might hold great potential for protein adsorption and osseointegration capacity. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, it was found that compared to titanium, PEEK is less osseoconductive and bioactive. PEEK is therefore unsuitable for use as a dental implant in its unmodified form. Implantitis and implant failure occurs from improper osseoconductivity and bioactivity of dental implants.https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/18557/66902_CE[Ra1]_F(SS)_PF1(KB_OM)_PFA(KB_KM)_PN(KM).pdfbioactivenewcastle-ottawa scaleosseoconductivity
spellingShingle Seema Patil
Paresh Gandhi
Aditi Kanitkar
Rupali Patil
Bhagyashree Kalsekar
Evaluation of Protein Adsorption and Osseointegration Potential of Polyetheretherketone versus Titanium Dental Implants: A Systematic Review
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
bioactive
newcastle-ottawa scale
osseoconductivity
title Evaluation of Protein Adsorption and Osseointegration Potential of Polyetheretherketone versus Titanium Dental Implants: A Systematic Review
title_full Evaluation of Protein Adsorption and Osseointegration Potential of Polyetheretherketone versus Titanium Dental Implants: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Evaluation of Protein Adsorption and Osseointegration Potential of Polyetheretherketone versus Titanium Dental Implants: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Protein Adsorption and Osseointegration Potential of Polyetheretherketone versus Titanium Dental Implants: A Systematic Review
title_short Evaluation of Protein Adsorption and Osseointegration Potential of Polyetheretherketone versus Titanium Dental Implants: A Systematic Review
title_sort evaluation of protein adsorption and osseointegration potential of polyetheretherketone versus titanium dental implants a systematic review
topic bioactive
newcastle-ottawa scale
osseoconductivity
url https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/18557/66902_CE[Ra1]_F(SS)_PF1(KB_OM)_PFA(KB_KM)_PN(KM).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT seemapatil evaluationofproteinadsorptionandosseointegrationpotentialofpolyetheretherketoneversustitaniumdentalimplantsasystematicreview
AT pareshgandhi evaluationofproteinadsorptionandosseointegrationpotentialofpolyetheretherketoneversustitaniumdentalimplantsasystematicreview
AT aditikanitkar evaluationofproteinadsorptionandosseointegrationpotentialofpolyetheretherketoneversustitaniumdentalimplantsasystematicreview
AT rupalipatil evaluationofproteinadsorptionandosseointegrationpotentialofpolyetheretherketoneversustitaniumdentalimplantsasystematicreview
AT bhagyashreekalsekar evaluationofproteinadsorptionandosseointegrationpotentialofpolyetheretherketoneversustitaniumdentalimplantsasystematicreview