Full-Range Static Method of Calibration for Laser Tracker

This paper focuses on the challenge of the inability to accurately calibrate the static measurement of a laser tracker across the full scale. To address this issue, this paper proposes to add a hollow corner cube prism on a 50 m high-precision composite guide rail to achieve a double-range measureme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chang’an Hu, Fei Lv, Liang Xue, Jiangang Li, Xiaoyin Zhong, Yue Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-11-01
Series:Electronics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/12/22/4709
_version_ 1797459459671326720
author Chang’an Hu
Fei Lv
Liang Xue
Jiangang Li
Xiaoyin Zhong
Yue Xu
author_facet Chang’an Hu
Fei Lv
Liang Xue
Jiangang Li
Xiaoyin Zhong
Yue Xu
author_sort Chang’an Hu
collection DOAJ
description This paper focuses on the challenge of the inability to accurately calibrate the static measurement of a laser tracker across the full scale. To address this issue, this paper proposes to add a hollow corner cube prism on a 50 m high-precision composite guide rail to achieve a double-range measurement of the laser tracker. Data analysis indicated that, in the 77 m identical-directional double-range measurement experiment, the maximum indication error of a single-beam laser interferometer was −29.5 μm, and that of a triple-beam laser interferometer was 14.6 μm, and the measurement indication error was obviously small when the Abbe error was eliminated. The single-point repeatability of the tracker was 0.9 μm. In the 50 m identical-directional verification experiment, the results of the direct measurement outperformed those of the double-range measurement, and the indication errors under standard conditions were −4.0 μm and −8.9 μm, respectively. Overall, the method used in the experiment satisfies the requirements of the laser tracker. In terms of the identical-directional measurement, the measurement uncertainty of the tracker indication error is <i>U</i> ≈ 1.0 μm + 0.2L (<i>k</i> = 2) L = (0~77 m). The proposed method also provides insights for length measurements using other high-precision measuring instruments.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T16:51:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-55e874975c2b43e1ad1a4e2348bbfe3d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-9292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T16:51:39Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Electronics
spelling doaj.art-55e874975c2b43e1ad1a4e2348bbfe3d2023-11-24T14:39:47ZengMDPI AGElectronics2079-92922023-11-011222470910.3390/electronics12224709Full-Range Static Method of Calibration for Laser TrackerChang’an Hu0Fei Lv1Liang Xue2Jiangang Li3Xiaoyin Zhong4Yue Xu5National Institute of Measurement and Testing Technology, Chengdu 610021, ChinaSchool of Computer Science, Chengdu Normal University, Chengdu 611130, ChinaNational Institute of Measurement and Testing Technology, Chengdu 610021, ChinaNational Institute of Measurement and Testing Technology, Chengdu 610021, ChinaInstitute of Optics, National Institute of Measurement and Testing Technology, Chengdu 610021, ChinaSchool of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, ChinaThis paper focuses on the challenge of the inability to accurately calibrate the static measurement of a laser tracker across the full scale. To address this issue, this paper proposes to add a hollow corner cube prism on a 50 m high-precision composite guide rail to achieve a double-range measurement of the laser tracker. Data analysis indicated that, in the 77 m identical-directional double-range measurement experiment, the maximum indication error of a single-beam laser interferometer was −29.5 μm, and that of a triple-beam laser interferometer was 14.6 μm, and the measurement indication error was obviously small when the Abbe error was eliminated. The single-point repeatability of the tracker was 0.9 μm. In the 50 m identical-directional verification experiment, the results of the direct measurement outperformed those of the double-range measurement, and the indication errors under standard conditions were −4.0 μm and −8.9 μm, respectively. Overall, the method used in the experiment satisfies the requirements of the laser tracker. In terms of the identical-directional measurement, the measurement uncertainty of the tracker indication error is <i>U</i> ≈ 1.0 μm + 0.2L (<i>k</i> = 2) L = (0~77 m). The proposed method also provides insights for length measurements using other high-precision measuring instruments.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/12/22/4709laser trackerstatic errordouble-range measurementrepeatability experimentidentical-directional measurementtransverse measurement
spellingShingle Chang’an Hu
Fei Lv
Liang Xue
Jiangang Li
Xiaoyin Zhong
Yue Xu
Full-Range Static Method of Calibration for Laser Tracker
Electronics
laser tracker
static error
double-range measurement
repeatability experiment
identical-directional measurement
transverse measurement
title Full-Range Static Method of Calibration for Laser Tracker
title_full Full-Range Static Method of Calibration for Laser Tracker
title_fullStr Full-Range Static Method of Calibration for Laser Tracker
title_full_unstemmed Full-Range Static Method of Calibration for Laser Tracker
title_short Full-Range Static Method of Calibration for Laser Tracker
title_sort full range static method of calibration for laser tracker
topic laser tracker
static error
double-range measurement
repeatability experiment
identical-directional measurement
transverse measurement
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/12/22/4709
work_keys_str_mv AT changanhu fullrangestaticmethodofcalibrationforlasertracker
AT feilv fullrangestaticmethodofcalibrationforlasertracker
AT liangxue fullrangestaticmethodofcalibrationforlasertracker
AT jiangangli fullrangestaticmethodofcalibrationforlasertracker
AT xiaoyinzhong fullrangestaticmethodofcalibrationforlasertracker
AT yuexu fullrangestaticmethodofcalibrationforlasertracker