A prospective survey of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization and infection in the intensive care unit

Abstract Background Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) surveillance may improve empiric antimicrobial therapy, since colonizing strains frequently cause infections. This colonization may be ‘endogenous’ or ‘exogenous’, and the source determines infection control measures. We prospectively investigated the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Regev Cohen, Frida Babushkin, Shoshana Cohen, Marina Afraimov, Maurice Shapiro, Martina Uda, Efrat Khabra, Amos Adler, Ronen Ben Ami, Svetlana Paikin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-01-01
Series:Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-016-0167-7
_version_ 1819237404126478336
author Regev Cohen
Frida Babushkin
Shoshana Cohen
Marina Afraimov
Maurice Shapiro
Martina Uda
Efrat Khabra
Amos Adler
Ronen Ben Ami
Svetlana Paikin
author_facet Regev Cohen
Frida Babushkin
Shoshana Cohen
Marina Afraimov
Maurice Shapiro
Martina Uda
Efrat Khabra
Amos Adler
Ronen Ben Ami
Svetlana Paikin
author_sort Regev Cohen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) surveillance may improve empiric antimicrobial therapy, since colonizing strains frequently cause infections. This colonization may be ‘endogenous’ or ‘exogenous’, and the source determines infection control measures. We prospectively investigated the sources of PA, the clinical impact of PA colonization upon admission and the dynamics of colonization at different body sites throughout the intensive care unit stay. Methods Intensive care patients were screened on admission and weekly from the pharynx, endotracheal aspirate, rectum and urine. Molecular typing was performed using Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus Polymerase Chain reaction (ERIC-PCR). Results Between November 2014 and January 2015, 34 patients were included. Thirteen (38%) were colonized on admission, and were at a higher risk for PA-related clinical infection (Hazard Ratio = 14.6, p = 0.0002). Strains were often patient-specific, site-specific and site-persistent. Sixteen out of 17 (94%) clinical isolates were identical to strains found concurrently or previously on screening cultures from the same patient, and none were unique. Ventilator associated pneumonia-related strains were identical to endotracheal aspirates and pharynx screening (87–75% of cases). No clinical case was found among patients with repeated negative screening. Conclusion PA origin in this non-outbreak setting was mainly ‘endogenous’ and PA-strains were generally patient- and site-specific, especially in the gastrointestinal tract. While prediction of ventilator associated pneumonia-related PA-strain by screening was fair, the negative predictive value of screening was very high.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T13:19:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-55eec1e381df4213bb3f22033a9214c2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-2994
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T13:19:47Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
spelling doaj.art-55eec1e381df4213bb3f22033a9214c22022-12-21T17:45:30ZengBMCAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control2047-29942017-01-01611910.1186/s13756-016-0167-7A prospective survey of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization and infection in the intensive care unitRegev Cohen0Frida Babushkin1Shoshana Cohen2Marina Afraimov3Maurice Shapiro4Martina Uda5Efrat Khabra6Amos Adler7Ronen Ben Ami8Svetlana Paikin9Head of Infectious diseases unit, Sanz Medical Center, Laniado hospitalInfectious diseases unit, Sanz Medical Center, Laniado hospitalInfectious diseases unit, Sanz Medical Center, Laniado hospitalInfectious diseases unit, Sanz Medical Center, Laniado hospitalMedical and Surgical intensive care unit, Sanz Medical Center, Laniado hospitalMedical and Surgical intensive care unit, Sanz Medical Center, Laniado hospitalNational Center of Infection Control, Ministry of HealthNational Center of Infection Control, Ministry of HealthSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv UniversityMicrobiology Laboratory, Sanz Medical Center, Laniado hospitalAbstract Background Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) surveillance may improve empiric antimicrobial therapy, since colonizing strains frequently cause infections. This colonization may be ‘endogenous’ or ‘exogenous’, and the source determines infection control measures. We prospectively investigated the sources of PA, the clinical impact of PA colonization upon admission and the dynamics of colonization at different body sites throughout the intensive care unit stay. Methods Intensive care patients were screened on admission and weekly from the pharynx, endotracheal aspirate, rectum and urine. Molecular typing was performed using Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus Polymerase Chain reaction (ERIC-PCR). Results Between November 2014 and January 2015, 34 patients were included. Thirteen (38%) were colonized on admission, and were at a higher risk for PA-related clinical infection (Hazard Ratio = 14.6, p = 0.0002). Strains were often patient-specific, site-specific and site-persistent. Sixteen out of 17 (94%) clinical isolates were identical to strains found concurrently or previously on screening cultures from the same patient, and none were unique. Ventilator associated pneumonia-related strains were identical to endotracheal aspirates and pharynx screening (87–75% of cases). No clinical case was found among patients with repeated negative screening. Conclusion PA origin in this non-outbreak setting was mainly ‘endogenous’ and PA-strains were generally patient- and site-specific, especially in the gastrointestinal tract. While prediction of ventilator associated pneumonia-related PA-strain by screening was fair, the negative predictive value of screening was very high.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-016-0167-7Pseudomonas aeruginosaEndogenousIntensive Care unitSurveillanceERIC-PCRInfection control
spellingShingle Regev Cohen
Frida Babushkin
Shoshana Cohen
Marina Afraimov
Maurice Shapiro
Martina Uda
Efrat Khabra
Amos Adler
Ronen Ben Ami
Svetlana Paikin
A prospective survey of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization and infection in the intensive care unit
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Endogenous
Intensive Care unit
Surveillance
ERIC-PCR
Infection control
title A prospective survey of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization and infection in the intensive care unit
title_full A prospective survey of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization and infection in the intensive care unit
title_fullStr A prospective survey of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization and infection in the intensive care unit
title_full_unstemmed A prospective survey of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization and infection in the intensive care unit
title_short A prospective survey of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization and infection in the intensive care unit
title_sort prospective survey of pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization and infection in the intensive care unit
topic Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Endogenous
Intensive Care unit
Surveillance
ERIC-PCR
Infection control
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-016-0167-7
work_keys_str_mv AT regevcohen aprospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT fridababushkin aprospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT shoshanacohen aprospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT marinaafraimov aprospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT mauriceshapiro aprospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT martinauda aprospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT efratkhabra aprospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT amosadler aprospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT ronenbenami aprospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT svetlanapaikin aprospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT regevcohen prospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT fridababushkin prospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT shoshanacohen prospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT marinaafraimov prospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT mauriceshapiro prospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT martinauda prospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT efratkhabra prospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT amosadler prospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT ronenbenami prospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit
AT svetlanapaikin prospectivesurveyofpseudomonasaeruginosacolonizationandinfectionintheintensivecareunit