Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza and the Quest for the Historical Jesus
The feminist theological and historical work of Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza has been met with diverging responses. For feminist biblical scholars, Schüssler Fiorenza is essential reading, with even her works from the 1970s and 1980s still standing as key reference points. For mainstream (“malestrea...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2020-08-01
|
| Series: | Open Theology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0117 |
| _version_ | 1818690318509277184 |
|---|---|
| author | Walters Amy Madeleine |
| author_facet | Walters Amy Madeleine |
| author_sort | Walters Amy Madeleine |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The feminist theological and historical work of Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza has been met with diverging responses. For feminist biblical scholars, Schüssler Fiorenza is essential reading, with even her works from the 1970s and 1980s still standing as key reference points. For mainstream (“malestream”) biblical scholarship, however, her entire body of writing is typically ignored, including within historical Jesus research (HJR), despite its value in both problematising and advancing the so-called Quests for the Historical Jesus. By evaluating and synthesising Schüssler Fiorenza’s HJR work on fundamentalism, feminism, and anti-Semitism, this article situates the effects of Schüssler Fiorenza’s work and the credibility of her critics within the Quests. While the themes Schüssler Fiorenza addresses, such as feminism and Judaism, are key features of the Third Quest, Schüssler Fiorenza’s proposals with regard to HJR, including the politics of interpretation, the shift to memory and orality studies, and the evaluation of meaning-making itself, are theoretically critical and self-reflexive in a way which the Third Quest has rarely been. Given the emphasis Schüssler Fiorenza places on self-evaluation, and her critical examination of the work of her peers in HJR, one is led to consider the possibility that her work may represent a Third Quest Critical-Stream, or even a Fourth Quest. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-17T12:24:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-562977aa8f4b41b08c9238061615bef0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2300-6579 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-17T12:24:06Z |
| publishDate | 2020-08-01 |
| publisher | De Gruyter |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Open Theology |
| spelling | doaj.art-562977aa8f4b41b08c9238061615bef02022-12-21T21:48:51ZengDe GruyterOpen Theology2300-65792020-08-016146847410.1515/opth-2020-0117opth-2020-0117Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza and the Quest for the Historical JesusWalters Amy Madeleine0Theology and Religious Studies, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern IrelandThe feminist theological and historical work of Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza has been met with diverging responses. For feminist biblical scholars, Schüssler Fiorenza is essential reading, with even her works from the 1970s and 1980s still standing as key reference points. For mainstream (“malestream”) biblical scholarship, however, her entire body of writing is typically ignored, including within historical Jesus research (HJR), despite its value in both problematising and advancing the so-called Quests for the Historical Jesus. By evaluating and synthesising Schüssler Fiorenza’s HJR work on fundamentalism, feminism, and anti-Semitism, this article situates the effects of Schüssler Fiorenza’s work and the credibility of her critics within the Quests. While the themes Schüssler Fiorenza addresses, such as feminism and Judaism, are key features of the Third Quest, Schüssler Fiorenza’s proposals with regard to HJR, including the politics of interpretation, the shift to memory and orality studies, and the evaluation of meaning-making itself, are theoretically critical and self-reflexive in a way which the Third Quest has rarely been. Given the emphasis Schüssler Fiorenza places on self-evaluation, and her critical examination of the work of her peers in HJR, one is led to consider the possibility that her work may represent a Third Quest Critical-Stream, or even a Fourth Quest.https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0117quests for the historical jesusfeminist biblical scholarshipelisabeth schüssler fiorenzahistorical jesus researchcritical theoryfeminismanti-semitismfundamentalism |
| spellingShingle | Walters Amy Madeleine Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza and the Quest for the Historical Jesus Open Theology quests for the historical jesus feminist biblical scholarship elisabeth schüssler fiorenza historical jesus research critical theory feminism anti-semitism fundamentalism |
| title | Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza and the Quest for the Historical Jesus |
| title_full | Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza and the Quest for the Historical Jesus |
| title_fullStr | Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza and the Quest for the Historical Jesus |
| title_full_unstemmed | Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza and the Quest for the Historical Jesus |
| title_short | Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza and the Quest for the Historical Jesus |
| title_sort | elisabeth schussler fiorenza and the quest for the historical jesus |
| topic | quests for the historical jesus feminist biblical scholarship elisabeth schüssler fiorenza historical jesus research critical theory feminism anti-semitism fundamentalism |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0117 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT waltersamymadeleine elisabethschusslerfiorenzaandthequestforthehistoricaljesus |