The effectiveness of using virtual patient educational tools to improve medical students’ clinical reasoning skills: a systematic review
Abstract Background Use of virtual patient educational tools could fill the current gap in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills. However, there is a limited understanding of their effectiveness. The aim of this study was to synthesise the evidence to understand the effectiveness of virtual pati...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2022-05-01
|
| Series: | BMC Medical Education |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03410-x |
| _version_ | 1811253246639996928 |
|---|---|
| author | Ruth Plackett Angelos P. Kassianos Sophie Mylan Maria Kambouri Rosalind Raine Jessica Sheringham |
| author_facet | Ruth Plackett Angelos P. Kassianos Sophie Mylan Maria Kambouri Rosalind Raine Jessica Sheringham |
| author_sort | Ruth Plackett |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Use of virtual patient educational tools could fill the current gap in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills. However, there is a limited understanding of their effectiveness. The aim of this study was to synthesise the evidence to understand the effectiveness of virtual patient tools aimed at improving undergraduate medical students’ clinical reasoning skills. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO from 1990 to January 2022, to identify all experimental articles testing the effectiveness of virtual patient educational tools on medical students’ clinical reasoning skills. Quality of the articles was assessed using an adapted form of the MERSQI and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. A narrative synthesis summarised intervention features, how virtual patient tools were evaluated and reported effectiveness. Results The search revealed 8,186 articles, with 19 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Average study quality was moderate (M = 6.5, SD = 2.7), with nearly half not reporting any measurement of validity or reliability for their clinical reasoning outcome measure (8/19, 42%). Eleven articles found a positive effect of virtual patient tools on reasoning (11/19, 58%). Four reported no significant effect and four reported mixed effects (4/19, 21%). Several domains of clinical reasoning were evaluated. Data gathering, ideas about diagnosis and patient management were more often found to improve after virtual patient use (34/47 analyses, 72%) than application of knowledge, flexibility in thinking and problem-solving (3/7 analyses, 43%). Conclusions Using virtual patient tools could effectively complement current teaching especially if opportunities for face-to-face teaching or other methods are limited, as there was some evidence that virtual patient educational tools can improve undergraduate medical students’ clinical reasoning skills. Evaluations that measured more case specific clinical reasoning domains, such as data gathering, showed more consistent improvement than general measures like problem-solving. Case specific measures might be more sensitive to change given the context dependent nature of clinical reasoning. Consistent use of validated clinical reasoning measures is needed to enable a meta-analysis to estimate effectiveness. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T16:47:57Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-562e1cf5103942ff9622c3847c1122f0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1472-6920 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T16:47:57Z |
| publishDate | 2022-05-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Medical Education |
| spelling | doaj.art-562e1cf5103942ff9622c3847c1122f02022-12-22T03:24:31ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202022-05-0122111810.1186/s12909-022-03410-xThe effectiveness of using virtual patient educational tools to improve medical students’ clinical reasoning skills: a systematic reviewRuth Plackett0Angelos P. Kassianos1Sophie Mylan2Maria Kambouri3Rosalind Raine4Jessica Sheringham5Department of Applied Health Research, UCLDepartment of Applied Health Research, UCLDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineInstitute of Education, UCLDepartment of Applied Health Research, UCLDepartment of Applied Health Research, UCLAbstract Background Use of virtual patient educational tools could fill the current gap in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills. However, there is a limited understanding of their effectiveness. The aim of this study was to synthesise the evidence to understand the effectiveness of virtual patient tools aimed at improving undergraduate medical students’ clinical reasoning skills. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO from 1990 to January 2022, to identify all experimental articles testing the effectiveness of virtual patient educational tools on medical students’ clinical reasoning skills. Quality of the articles was assessed using an adapted form of the MERSQI and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. A narrative synthesis summarised intervention features, how virtual patient tools were evaluated and reported effectiveness. Results The search revealed 8,186 articles, with 19 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Average study quality was moderate (M = 6.5, SD = 2.7), with nearly half not reporting any measurement of validity or reliability for their clinical reasoning outcome measure (8/19, 42%). Eleven articles found a positive effect of virtual patient tools on reasoning (11/19, 58%). Four reported no significant effect and four reported mixed effects (4/19, 21%). Several domains of clinical reasoning were evaluated. Data gathering, ideas about diagnosis and patient management were more often found to improve after virtual patient use (34/47 analyses, 72%) than application of knowledge, flexibility in thinking and problem-solving (3/7 analyses, 43%). Conclusions Using virtual patient tools could effectively complement current teaching especially if opportunities for face-to-face teaching or other methods are limited, as there was some evidence that virtual patient educational tools can improve undergraduate medical students’ clinical reasoning skills. Evaluations that measured more case specific clinical reasoning domains, such as data gathering, showed more consistent improvement than general measures like problem-solving. Case specific measures might be more sensitive to change given the context dependent nature of clinical reasoning. Consistent use of validated clinical reasoning measures is needed to enable a meta-analysis to estimate effectiveness.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03410-xComputer simulationVirtual patientComputer-assisted instructionEducational technologyMedical educationClinical decision-making |
| spellingShingle | Ruth Plackett Angelos P. Kassianos Sophie Mylan Maria Kambouri Rosalind Raine Jessica Sheringham The effectiveness of using virtual patient educational tools to improve medical students’ clinical reasoning skills: a systematic review BMC Medical Education Computer simulation Virtual patient Computer-assisted instruction Educational technology Medical education Clinical decision-making |
| title | The effectiveness of using virtual patient educational tools to improve medical students’ clinical reasoning skills: a systematic review |
| title_full | The effectiveness of using virtual patient educational tools to improve medical students’ clinical reasoning skills: a systematic review |
| title_fullStr | The effectiveness of using virtual patient educational tools to improve medical students’ clinical reasoning skills: a systematic review |
| title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of using virtual patient educational tools to improve medical students’ clinical reasoning skills: a systematic review |
| title_short | The effectiveness of using virtual patient educational tools to improve medical students’ clinical reasoning skills: a systematic review |
| title_sort | effectiveness of using virtual patient educational tools to improve medical students clinical reasoning skills a systematic review |
| topic | Computer simulation Virtual patient Computer-assisted instruction Educational technology Medical education Clinical decision-making |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03410-x |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ruthplackett theeffectivenessofusingvirtualpatienteducationaltoolstoimprovemedicalstudentsclinicalreasoningskillsasystematicreview AT angelospkassianos theeffectivenessofusingvirtualpatienteducationaltoolstoimprovemedicalstudentsclinicalreasoningskillsasystematicreview AT sophiemylan theeffectivenessofusingvirtualpatienteducationaltoolstoimprovemedicalstudentsclinicalreasoningskillsasystematicreview AT mariakambouri theeffectivenessofusingvirtualpatienteducationaltoolstoimprovemedicalstudentsclinicalreasoningskillsasystematicreview AT rosalindraine theeffectivenessofusingvirtualpatienteducationaltoolstoimprovemedicalstudentsclinicalreasoningskillsasystematicreview AT jessicasheringham theeffectivenessofusingvirtualpatienteducationaltoolstoimprovemedicalstudentsclinicalreasoningskillsasystematicreview AT ruthplackett effectivenessofusingvirtualpatienteducationaltoolstoimprovemedicalstudentsclinicalreasoningskillsasystematicreview AT angelospkassianos effectivenessofusingvirtualpatienteducationaltoolstoimprovemedicalstudentsclinicalreasoningskillsasystematicreview AT sophiemylan effectivenessofusingvirtualpatienteducationaltoolstoimprovemedicalstudentsclinicalreasoningskillsasystematicreview AT mariakambouri effectivenessofusingvirtualpatienteducationaltoolstoimprovemedicalstudentsclinicalreasoningskillsasystematicreview AT rosalindraine effectivenessofusingvirtualpatienteducationaltoolstoimprovemedicalstudentsclinicalreasoningskillsasystematicreview AT jessicasheringham effectivenessofusingvirtualpatienteducationaltoolstoimprovemedicalstudentsclinicalreasoningskillsasystematicreview |