Using Accelerometer and GPS Data for Real-Life Physical Activity Type Detection

This paper aims to examine the role of global positioning system (GPS) sensor data in real-life physical activity (PA) type detection. Thirty-three young participants wore devices including GPS and accelerometer sensors on five body positions and performed daily PAs in two protocols, namely semi-str...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hoda Allahbakhshi, Lindsey Conrow, Babak Naimi, Robert Weibel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-01-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/3/588
_version_ 1798038990434074624
author Hoda Allahbakhshi
Lindsey Conrow
Babak Naimi
Robert Weibel
author_facet Hoda Allahbakhshi
Lindsey Conrow
Babak Naimi
Robert Weibel
author_sort Hoda Allahbakhshi
collection DOAJ
description This paper aims to examine the role of global positioning system (GPS) sensor data in real-life physical activity (PA) type detection. Thirty-three young participants wore devices including GPS and accelerometer sensors on five body positions and performed daily PAs in two protocols, namely semi-structured and real-life. One general random forest (RF) model integrating data from all sensors and five individual RF models using data from each sensor position were trained using semi-structured (Scenario 1) and combined (semi-structured + real-life) data (Scenario 2). The results showed that in general, adding GPS features (speed and elevation difference) to accelerometer data improves classification performance particularly for detecting non-level and level walking. Assessing the transferability of the models on real-life data showed that models from Scenario 2 are strongly transferable, particularly when adding GPS data to the training data. Comparing individual models indicated that knee-models provide comparable classification performance (above 80%) to general models in both scenarios. In conclusion, adding GPS data improves real-life PA type classification performance if combined data are used for training the model. Moreover, the knee-model provides the minimal device configuration with reliable accuracy for detecting real-life PA types.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T21:47:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-56317111b88e4a329f31349b80ad8658
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T21:47:46Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-56317111b88e4a329f31349b80ad86582022-12-22T04:01:21ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-01-0120358810.3390/s20030588s20030588Using Accelerometer and GPS Data for Real-Life Physical Activity Type DetectionHoda Allahbakhshi0Lindsey Conrow1Babak Naimi2Robert Weibel3Department of Geography, Geographic Information Systems Unit, University of Zurich (UZH), Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Geography, Geographic Information Systems Unit, University of Zurich (UZH), Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandDepartment of Geography, Geographic Information Systems Unit, University of Zurich (UZH), Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, SwitzerlandThis paper aims to examine the role of global positioning system (GPS) sensor data in real-life physical activity (PA) type detection. Thirty-three young participants wore devices including GPS and accelerometer sensors on five body positions and performed daily PAs in two protocols, namely semi-structured and real-life. One general random forest (RF) model integrating data from all sensors and five individual RF models using data from each sensor position were trained using semi-structured (Scenario 1) and combined (semi-structured + real-life) data (Scenario 2). The results showed that in general, adding GPS features (speed and elevation difference) to accelerometer data improves classification performance particularly for detecting non-level and level walking. Assessing the transferability of the models on real-life data showed that models from Scenario 2 are strongly transferable, particularly when adding GPS data to the training data. Comparing individual models indicated that knee-models provide comparable classification performance (above 80%) to general models in both scenarios. In conclusion, adding GPS data improves real-life PA type classification performance if combined data are used for training the model. Moreover, the knee-model provides the minimal device configuration with reliable accuracy for detecting real-life PA types.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/3/588physical activity typereal-lifegpsgis
spellingShingle Hoda Allahbakhshi
Lindsey Conrow
Babak Naimi
Robert Weibel
Using Accelerometer and GPS Data for Real-Life Physical Activity Type Detection
Sensors
physical activity type
real-life
gps
gis
title Using Accelerometer and GPS Data for Real-Life Physical Activity Type Detection
title_full Using Accelerometer and GPS Data for Real-Life Physical Activity Type Detection
title_fullStr Using Accelerometer and GPS Data for Real-Life Physical Activity Type Detection
title_full_unstemmed Using Accelerometer and GPS Data for Real-Life Physical Activity Type Detection
title_short Using Accelerometer and GPS Data for Real-Life Physical Activity Type Detection
title_sort using accelerometer and gps data for real life physical activity type detection
topic physical activity type
real-life
gps
gis
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/3/588
work_keys_str_mv AT hodaallahbakhshi usingaccelerometerandgpsdataforreallifephysicalactivitytypedetection
AT lindseyconrow usingaccelerometerandgpsdataforreallifephysicalactivitytypedetection
AT babaknaimi usingaccelerometerandgpsdataforreallifephysicalactivitytypedetection
AT robertweibel usingaccelerometerandgpsdataforreallifephysicalactivitytypedetection