Evaluation and environmental correction of ambient CO<sub>2</sub> measurements from a low-cost NDIR sensor

Non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) sensors are a low-cost way to observe carbon dioxide concentrations in air, but their specified accuracy and precision are not sufficient for some scientific applications. An initial evaluation of six SenseAir K30 carbon dioxide NDIR sensors in a lab setting showed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. R. Martin, N. Zeng, A. Karion, R. R. Dickerson, X. Ren, B. N. Turpie, K. J. Weber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2017-07-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/10/2383/2017/amt-10-2383-2017.pdf
_version_ 1811310732012158976
author C. R. Martin
N. Zeng
N. Zeng
A. Karion
R. R. Dickerson
R. R. Dickerson
X. Ren
X. Ren
B. N. Turpie
K. J. Weber
K. J. Weber
author_facet C. R. Martin
N. Zeng
N. Zeng
A. Karion
R. R. Dickerson
R. R. Dickerson
X. Ren
X. Ren
B. N. Turpie
K. J. Weber
K. J. Weber
author_sort C. R. Martin
collection DOAJ
description Non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) sensors are a low-cost way to observe carbon dioxide concentrations in air, but their specified accuracy and precision are not sufficient for some scientific applications. An initial evaluation of six SenseAir K30 carbon dioxide NDIR sensors in a lab setting showed that without any calibration or correction, the sensors have an individual root mean square error (RMSE) between  ∼ 5 and 21 parts per million (ppm) compared to a research-grade greenhouse gas analyzer using cavity enhanced laser absorption spectroscopy. Through further evaluation, after correcting for environmental variables with coefficients determined through a multivariate linear regression analysis, the calculated difference between the each of six individual K30 NDIR sensors and the higher-precision instrument had an RMSE of between 1.7 and 4.3 ppm for 1 min data. The median RMSE improved from 9.6 for off-the-shelf sensors to 1.9 ppm after correction and calibration, demonstrating the potential to provide useful information for ambient air monitoring.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T10:04:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-563c4dce878441858577b461e30dfe6c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1867-1381
1867-8548
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T10:04:07Z
publishDate 2017-07-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
spelling doaj.art-563c4dce878441858577b461e30dfe6c2022-12-22T02:51:08ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482017-07-01102383239510.5194/amt-10-2383-2017Evaluation and environmental correction of ambient CO<sub>2</sub> measurements from a low-cost NDIR sensorC. R. Martin0N. Zeng1N. Zeng2A. Karion3R. R. Dickerson4R. R. Dickerson5X. Ren6X. Ren7B. N. Turpie8K. J. Weber9K. J. Weber10Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USADepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USAEarth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USANational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USADepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USAEarth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USADepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USAAir Resources Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, College Park, MD 20740, USADepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USADepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USAnow at: Department of Geography, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USANon-dispersive infrared (NDIR) sensors are a low-cost way to observe carbon dioxide concentrations in air, but their specified accuracy and precision are not sufficient for some scientific applications. An initial evaluation of six SenseAir K30 carbon dioxide NDIR sensors in a lab setting showed that without any calibration or correction, the sensors have an individual root mean square error (RMSE) between  ∼ 5 and 21 parts per million (ppm) compared to a research-grade greenhouse gas analyzer using cavity enhanced laser absorption spectroscopy. Through further evaluation, after correcting for environmental variables with coefficients determined through a multivariate linear regression analysis, the calculated difference between the each of six individual K30 NDIR sensors and the higher-precision instrument had an RMSE of between 1.7 and 4.3 ppm for 1 min data. The median RMSE improved from 9.6 for off-the-shelf sensors to 1.9 ppm after correction and calibration, demonstrating the potential to provide useful information for ambient air monitoring.https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/10/2383/2017/amt-10-2383-2017.pdf
spellingShingle C. R. Martin
N. Zeng
N. Zeng
A. Karion
R. R. Dickerson
R. R. Dickerson
X. Ren
X. Ren
B. N. Turpie
K. J. Weber
K. J. Weber
Evaluation and environmental correction of ambient CO<sub>2</sub> measurements from a low-cost NDIR sensor
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
title Evaluation and environmental correction of ambient CO<sub>2</sub> measurements from a low-cost NDIR sensor
title_full Evaluation and environmental correction of ambient CO<sub>2</sub> measurements from a low-cost NDIR sensor
title_fullStr Evaluation and environmental correction of ambient CO<sub>2</sub> measurements from a low-cost NDIR sensor
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and environmental correction of ambient CO<sub>2</sub> measurements from a low-cost NDIR sensor
title_short Evaluation and environmental correction of ambient CO<sub>2</sub> measurements from a low-cost NDIR sensor
title_sort evaluation and environmental correction of ambient co sub 2 sub measurements from a low cost ndir sensor
url https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/10/2383/2017/amt-10-2383-2017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT crmartin evaluationandenvironmentalcorrectionofambientcosub2submeasurementsfromalowcostndirsensor
AT nzeng evaluationandenvironmentalcorrectionofambientcosub2submeasurementsfromalowcostndirsensor
AT nzeng evaluationandenvironmentalcorrectionofambientcosub2submeasurementsfromalowcostndirsensor
AT akarion evaluationandenvironmentalcorrectionofambientcosub2submeasurementsfromalowcostndirsensor
AT rrdickerson evaluationandenvironmentalcorrectionofambientcosub2submeasurementsfromalowcostndirsensor
AT rrdickerson evaluationandenvironmentalcorrectionofambientcosub2submeasurementsfromalowcostndirsensor
AT xren evaluationandenvironmentalcorrectionofambientcosub2submeasurementsfromalowcostndirsensor
AT xren evaluationandenvironmentalcorrectionofambientcosub2submeasurementsfromalowcostndirsensor
AT bnturpie evaluationandenvironmentalcorrectionofambientcosub2submeasurementsfromalowcostndirsensor
AT kjweber evaluationandenvironmentalcorrectionofambientcosub2submeasurementsfromalowcostndirsensor
AT kjweber evaluationandenvironmentalcorrectionofambientcosub2submeasurementsfromalowcostndirsensor