A review of kidney stone ureteroscopy lithotripsy devices

Background: Surgical intervention for kidney stones which utilize ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy can result in miniscule fragments that are irrigated out. A stone-free outcome does not occur in 42% of procedures, where “clinically insignificant residual fragments” (CIRF) can potentially be path...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Bhattaram, F. Masood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Verduci Editore 2022-06-01
Series:International Journal of Medical Device and Adjuvant Treatments
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ijmdat.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2022/06/e387.pdf
_version_ 1811289468204744704
author R. Bhattaram
F. Masood
author_facet R. Bhattaram
F. Masood
author_sort R. Bhattaram
collection DOAJ
description Background: Surgical intervention for kidney stones which utilize ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy can result in miniscule fragments that are irrigated out. A stone-free outcome does not occur in 42% of procedures, where “clinically insignificant residual fragments” (CIRF) can potentially be pathological. This demonstrates a need for adequate intraoperative CIRF containment methods, which can reduce CIRF pathology and follow-up procedures. This study aims to review popular devices and innovative approaches of existing devices aimed to control CIRF. Methods: A search was conducted on MEDLINE and PubMed for articles related to kidney stone fragments and “anti-retropulsion” devices. A comprehensive list of devices and studies was created with both mechanical and gel-based devices. Results: The following specific types of devices included in this study are baskets, suction devices, gels, and balloon catheters devices. Each device is either a popular device or an innovative one within each device category. A common theme among these devices is that a combination of multiple approaches, such as a balloon and a basket device together, can improve stone free rates. Similarly, using existing devices in novel innovative methods can lead to improvement as well. Conclusions: We find that innovative and effective devices can be accomplished through synthesizing existing knowledge and utilizing novel techniques. Furthermore, these approaches are open to provider modifications to facilitate intraoperative adaptations. As ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy becomes a mainstay in treating kidney stones, innovative and intraoperatively flexible devices can further improve this procedure.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T03:56:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-56407a47d6004a1ea59058cbc00b920f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2476-0994
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T03:56:39Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Verduci Editore
record_format Article
series International Journal of Medical Device and Adjuvant Treatments
spelling doaj.art-56407a47d6004a1ea59058cbc00b920f2022-12-22T03:03:37ZengVerduci EditoreInternational Journal of Medical Device and Adjuvant Treatments2476-09942022-06-01510.32113/ijmdat_20226_387387A review of kidney stone ureteroscopy lithotripsy devicesR. Bhattaram0F. Masood1Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USADepartment of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USABackground: Surgical intervention for kidney stones which utilize ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy can result in miniscule fragments that are irrigated out. A stone-free outcome does not occur in 42% of procedures, where “clinically insignificant residual fragments” (CIRF) can potentially be pathological. This demonstrates a need for adequate intraoperative CIRF containment methods, which can reduce CIRF pathology and follow-up procedures. This study aims to review popular devices and innovative approaches of existing devices aimed to control CIRF. Methods: A search was conducted on MEDLINE and PubMed for articles related to kidney stone fragments and “anti-retropulsion” devices. A comprehensive list of devices and studies was created with both mechanical and gel-based devices. Results: The following specific types of devices included in this study are baskets, suction devices, gels, and balloon catheters devices. Each device is either a popular device or an innovative one within each device category. A common theme among these devices is that a combination of multiple approaches, such as a balloon and a basket device together, can improve stone free rates. Similarly, using existing devices in novel innovative methods can lead to improvement as well. Conclusions: We find that innovative and effective devices can be accomplished through synthesizing existing knowledge and utilizing novel techniques. Furthermore, these approaches are open to provider modifications to facilitate intraoperative adaptations. As ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy becomes a mainstay in treating kidney stones, innovative and intraoperatively flexible devices can further improve this procedure.https://www.ijmdat.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2022/06/e387.pdflithotripsydevicegelkidney stonefragments
spellingShingle R. Bhattaram
F. Masood
A review of kidney stone ureteroscopy lithotripsy devices
International Journal of Medical Device and Adjuvant Treatments
lithotripsy
device
gel
kidney stone
fragments
title A review of kidney stone ureteroscopy lithotripsy devices
title_full A review of kidney stone ureteroscopy lithotripsy devices
title_fullStr A review of kidney stone ureteroscopy lithotripsy devices
title_full_unstemmed A review of kidney stone ureteroscopy lithotripsy devices
title_short A review of kidney stone ureteroscopy lithotripsy devices
title_sort review of kidney stone ureteroscopy lithotripsy devices
topic lithotripsy
device
gel
kidney stone
fragments
url https://www.ijmdat.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2022/06/e387.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rbhattaram areviewofkidneystoneureteroscopylithotripsydevices
AT fmasood areviewofkidneystoneureteroscopylithotripsydevices
AT rbhattaram reviewofkidneystoneureteroscopylithotripsydevices
AT fmasood reviewofkidneystoneureteroscopylithotripsydevices