Critique and Evaluation of the Imamate Discourse in the Confrontation between Ibn Taymiyyah and Allama Helli in Minhaj al-Sunnah and Minhaj al-Karama
The present study aims to analyze the discourse of Imamate in the political thought of Allameh Helli and Ibn Taymiyyah in order to guide a rational theory of Islam in terms of political legitimacy by highlighting their weaknesses and views based on reason, books, and tradition. Hence, with the metho...
Main Authors: | Maliha Ghanadiyan, Mahboubeh Esmaili, Mirza Mohammad Hassani |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Political Studies Association of the Seminary
2021-12-01
|
Series: | سیاست متعالیه |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://sm.psas.ir/article_252099_6afeb192d55b2bbad99229e6f66edcde.pdf |
Similar Items
-
METODE SYARAḤ AL-SUYŪṬĪ DALAM AL-DĪBĀJ: Kritik terhadap Syaraḥ Hadis Penafsiran Surah al-Mā’idah Ayat 3 dan Perbandingannya dengan Syaraḥ al-Nawawī
by: Asrar Mabrur Faza
Published: (2016-05-01) -
Wali and Karama: A Discourse and Authority Contestation in al-Tarmasi’s Bughyat al-Adhkiya’
by: Ade Fakih Kurniawan, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
A Comparative Study of al-Ghazali’s and Ibn Taymiyyah’s Views on Sufism
by: AHMED NAFIU ARIKEWUYO
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Islamic Approach towards Import and Export: A Research Analysis in the Context of Umar’s (RA) Vision
by: Irfan Ullah Khan, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
An Analysis of ʿAllāma Ṭabāṭabāʾī’s Approach to Shiite and Sunni Exegetical Hadiths in al-Mīzān
by: Mohsen Rafat
Published: (2022-06-01)