A longitudinal study of audit quality differences among independent auditors

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the differences of audit quality of financial statements among auditors, including Big 4 and non-Big 4 auditors. Design/methodology/approach – By employing cross-sectional analysis of compliance (a proxy of audit quality) of goodwill impairment t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manh Dung Tran, Khairil Faizal Khairi, Nur Hidayah Laili
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Publishing 2019-11-01
Series:Journal of Economics and Development
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JED-10-2019-0040/full/pdf?title=a-longitudinal-study-of-audit-quality-differences-among-independent-auditors
_version_ 1811261554263326720
author Manh Dung Tran
Khairil Faizal Khairi
Nur Hidayah Laili
author_facet Manh Dung Tran
Khairil Faizal Khairi
Nur Hidayah Laili
author_sort Manh Dung Tran
collection DOAJ
description Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the differences of audit quality of financial statements among auditors, including Big 4 and non-Big 4 auditors. Design/methodology/approach – By employing cross-sectional analysis of compliance (a proxy of audit quality) of goodwill impairment testing of listed firms in the context of Hong Kong, the variation of audit quality of financial statements of auditees has been shown. Findings – Audit quality of Big 4 auditors is viewed to be higher than that of non-Big 4 audit firms and the homogeneity of audit quality among Big 4 auditors is not long accepted, but variation. Practical implications – Even though unqualified opinions have been given on the auditors’ reports, the quality of financial statements audit is a skeptical issue because of the high level of non-compliance of goodwill impairment testing under International Financial Reporting Standards. Originality/value – This study does emphasize the higher audit quality of financial statements of Big 4 auditors than that of non-Big 4 auditors and stresses the variation of audit quality among Big 4 auditors.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T19:07:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-56792a89b7e54d5295ac65fcf8d17440
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1859-0020
2632-5330
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T19:07:59Z
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher Emerald Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Economics and Development
spelling doaj.art-56792a89b7e54d5295ac65fcf8d174402022-12-22T03:19:59ZengEmerald PublishingJournal of Economics and Development1859-00202632-53302019-11-0121223424610.1108/JED-10-2019-0040636537A longitudinal study of audit quality differences among independent auditorsManh Dung Tran0Khairil Faizal Khairi1Nur Hidayah Laili2National Economics University, Hanoi, VietnamUniversity Sains Islam, Bandar Baru Nilai, MalaysiaUniversity Sains Islam, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaPurpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the differences of audit quality of financial statements among auditors, including Big 4 and non-Big 4 auditors. Design/methodology/approach – By employing cross-sectional analysis of compliance (a proxy of audit quality) of goodwill impairment testing of listed firms in the context of Hong Kong, the variation of audit quality of financial statements of auditees has been shown. Findings – Audit quality of Big 4 auditors is viewed to be higher than that of non-Big 4 audit firms and the homogeneity of audit quality among Big 4 auditors is not long accepted, but variation. Practical implications – Even though unqualified opinions have been given on the auditors’ reports, the quality of financial statements audit is a skeptical issue because of the high level of non-compliance of goodwill impairment testing under International Financial Reporting Standards. Originality/value – This study does emphasize the higher audit quality of financial statements of Big 4 auditors than that of non-Big 4 auditors and stresses the variation of audit quality among Big 4 auditors.https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JED-10-2019-0040/full/pdf?title=a-longitudinal-study-of-audit-quality-differences-among-independent-auditorshong konggoodwillaudit qualityhkas 36
spellingShingle Manh Dung Tran
Khairil Faizal Khairi
Nur Hidayah Laili
A longitudinal study of audit quality differences among independent auditors
Journal of Economics and Development
hong kong
goodwill
audit quality
hkas 36
title A longitudinal study of audit quality differences among independent auditors
title_full A longitudinal study of audit quality differences among independent auditors
title_fullStr A longitudinal study of audit quality differences among independent auditors
title_full_unstemmed A longitudinal study of audit quality differences among independent auditors
title_short A longitudinal study of audit quality differences among independent auditors
title_sort longitudinal study of audit quality differences among independent auditors
topic hong kong
goodwill
audit quality
hkas 36
url https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JED-10-2019-0040/full/pdf?title=a-longitudinal-study-of-audit-quality-differences-among-independent-auditors
work_keys_str_mv AT manhdungtran alongitudinalstudyofauditqualitydifferencesamongindependentauditors
AT khairilfaizalkhairi alongitudinalstudyofauditqualitydifferencesamongindependentauditors
AT nurhidayahlaili alongitudinalstudyofauditqualitydifferencesamongindependentauditors
AT manhdungtran longitudinalstudyofauditqualitydifferencesamongindependentauditors
AT khairilfaizalkhairi longitudinalstudyofauditqualitydifferencesamongindependentauditors
AT nurhidayahlaili longitudinalstudyofauditqualitydifferencesamongindependentauditors