The Zoom solution: Promoting effective cross-ideological communication online.
The rise of ideological polarization in the U.S. over the past few decades has come with an increase in hostility on both sides of the political aisle. Although communication and compromise are hallmarks of a functioning society, research has shown that people overestimate the negative affect they w...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270355 |
| _version_ | 1818041781014495232 |
|---|---|
| author | Ashley L Binnquist Stephanie Y Dolbier Macrina C Dieffenbach Matthew D Lieberman |
| author_facet | Ashley L Binnquist Stephanie Y Dolbier Macrina C Dieffenbach Matthew D Lieberman |
| author_sort | Ashley L Binnquist |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The rise of ideological polarization in the U.S. over the past few decades has come with an increase in hostility on both sides of the political aisle. Although communication and compromise are hallmarks of a functioning society, research has shown that people overestimate the negative affect they will experience when viewing oppositional media, and it is likely that negative forecasts lead many to avoid cross-ideological communication (CIC) altogether. Additionally, a growing ideological geographic divide and online extremism fueled by social media audiences make engaging in CIC more difficult than ever. Here, we demonstrate that online video-chat platforms (i.e., Zoom) can be used to promote effective CIC among ideologically polarized individuals, as well as to better study CIC in a controlled setting. Participants (n = 122) had a face-to-face CIC over Zoom, either privately or publicly with a silent ingroup audience present. Participant forecasts about the interaction were largely inaccurate, with the actual conversation experience found to be more positive than anticipated. Additionally, the presence of an ingroup audience was associated with increased conflict. In both conditions, participants showed preliminary signs of attitude moderation, felt more favorable toward the outgroup, and felt more informed about the issue after the CIC. These results suggest that face-to-face CIC's are generally positive and beneficial for polarized individuals, and that greater effects may be achieved through private conversations, as opposed to more public social media-like interactions. Future researchers studying ideological conflict may find success using similar Zoom paradigms to bring together ideologically diverse individuals in controlled lab settings. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T08:35:52Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-567b51bdfa8a49278999bb6086fefe12 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T08:35:52Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-567b51bdfa8a49278999bb6086fefe122022-12-22T01:55:58ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01177e027035510.1371/journal.pone.0270355The Zoom solution: Promoting effective cross-ideological communication online.Ashley L BinnquistStephanie Y DolbierMacrina C DieffenbachMatthew D LiebermanThe rise of ideological polarization in the U.S. over the past few decades has come with an increase in hostility on both sides of the political aisle. Although communication and compromise are hallmarks of a functioning society, research has shown that people overestimate the negative affect they will experience when viewing oppositional media, and it is likely that negative forecasts lead many to avoid cross-ideological communication (CIC) altogether. Additionally, a growing ideological geographic divide and online extremism fueled by social media audiences make engaging in CIC more difficult than ever. Here, we demonstrate that online video-chat platforms (i.e., Zoom) can be used to promote effective CIC among ideologically polarized individuals, as well as to better study CIC in a controlled setting. Participants (n = 122) had a face-to-face CIC over Zoom, either privately or publicly with a silent ingroup audience present. Participant forecasts about the interaction were largely inaccurate, with the actual conversation experience found to be more positive than anticipated. Additionally, the presence of an ingroup audience was associated with increased conflict. In both conditions, participants showed preliminary signs of attitude moderation, felt more favorable toward the outgroup, and felt more informed about the issue after the CIC. These results suggest that face-to-face CIC's are generally positive and beneficial for polarized individuals, and that greater effects may be achieved through private conversations, as opposed to more public social media-like interactions. Future researchers studying ideological conflict may find success using similar Zoom paradigms to bring together ideologically diverse individuals in controlled lab settings.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270355 |
| spellingShingle | Ashley L Binnquist Stephanie Y Dolbier Macrina C Dieffenbach Matthew D Lieberman The Zoom solution: Promoting effective cross-ideological communication online. PLoS ONE |
| title | The Zoom solution: Promoting effective cross-ideological communication online. |
| title_full | The Zoom solution: Promoting effective cross-ideological communication online. |
| title_fullStr | The Zoom solution: Promoting effective cross-ideological communication online. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Zoom solution: Promoting effective cross-ideological communication online. |
| title_short | The Zoom solution: Promoting effective cross-ideological communication online. |
| title_sort | zoom solution promoting effective cross ideological communication online |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270355 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ashleylbinnquist thezoomsolutionpromotingeffectivecrossideologicalcommunicationonline AT stephanieydolbier thezoomsolutionpromotingeffectivecrossideologicalcommunicationonline AT macrinacdieffenbach thezoomsolutionpromotingeffectivecrossideologicalcommunicationonline AT matthewdlieberman thezoomsolutionpromotingeffectivecrossideologicalcommunicationonline AT ashleylbinnquist zoomsolutionpromotingeffectivecrossideologicalcommunicationonline AT stephanieydolbier zoomsolutionpromotingeffectivecrossideologicalcommunicationonline AT macrinacdieffenbach zoomsolutionpromotingeffectivecrossideologicalcommunicationonline AT matthewdlieberman zoomsolutionpromotingeffectivecrossideologicalcommunicationonline |