Immigration Federalism as Ideology: Lessons from the States

Over the last decade states passed hundreds of immigration bills covering a range of policy areas. This article considers the recent state legislative surge against scholarly treatments of immigration federalism, and identifies the symbolic politics in state lawmaking. The analysis combines a histor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lina Newton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-11-01
Series:Laws
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/4/4/729
_version_ 1798039641700433920
author Lina Newton
author_facet Lina Newton
author_sort Lina Newton
collection DOAJ
description Over the last decade states passed hundreds of immigration bills covering a range of policy areas. This article considers the recent state legislative surge against scholarly treatments of immigration federalism, and identifies the symbolic politics in state lawmaking. The analysis combines a historical treatment of key court decisions that delineated boundaries of state and federal immigration roles with a legislative analysis of over 2200 immigration bills passed between 2006 and 2013, to identify the numerous ways in which national immigration policy shapes state measures. It argues that recent laws must be considered against symbolic federalism which privileges state sovereignty and justifies social policy devolution by advancing frames of intergovernmental conflict, state-level policy pragmatism, and federal ineffectiveness.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T21:56:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-568f71dce9684333a9bf7ca8140e5c1b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-471X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T21:56:41Z
publishDate 2015-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Laws
spelling doaj.art-568f71dce9684333a9bf7ca8140e5c1b2022-12-22T04:01:04ZengMDPI AGLaws2075-471X2015-11-014472975410.3390/laws4040729laws4040729Immigration Federalism as Ideology: Lessons from the StatesLina Newton0Political Science Department, Hunter College, CUNY, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USAOver the last decade states passed hundreds of immigration bills covering a range of policy areas. This article considers the recent state legislative surge against scholarly treatments of immigration federalism, and identifies the symbolic politics in state lawmaking. The analysis combines a historical treatment of key court decisions that delineated boundaries of state and federal immigration roles with a legislative analysis of over 2200 immigration bills passed between 2006 and 2013, to identify the numerous ways in which national immigration policy shapes state measures. It argues that recent laws must be considered against symbolic federalism which privileges state sovereignty and justifies social policy devolution by advancing frames of intergovernmental conflict, state-level policy pragmatism, and federal ineffectiveness.http://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/4/4/729immigration federalismstate immigration lawssymbolic politics
spellingShingle Lina Newton
Immigration Federalism as Ideology: Lessons from the States
Laws
immigration federalism
state immigration laws
symbolic politics
title Immigration Federalism as Ideology: Lessons from the States
title_full Immigration Federalism as Ideology: Lessons from the States
title_fullStr Immigration Federalism as Ideology: Lessons from the States
title_full_unstemmed Immigration Federalism as Ideology: Lessons from the States
title_short Immigration Federalism as Ideology: Lessons from the States
title_sort immigration federalism as ideology lessons from the states
topic immigration federalism
state immigration laws
symbolic politics
url http://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/4/4/729
work_keys_str_mv AT linanewton immigrationfederalismasideologylessonsfromthestates