Estimating Soil Hydraulic Parameters during Ponding Infiltration Using a Hybrid Algorithm

Accurate inversion of soil hydraulic parameters based on the van Genuchten–Mualem model has received much attention in soil science research. Herein, a hybrid algorithm method using particle swarm optimization and vector-evaluated genetic algorithm was used to invert the parameters <i>θ<sub...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yibo Li, Ye Liu, Xiaoyi Ma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/3/726
_version_ 1797613995170988032
author Yibo Li
Ye Liu
Xiaoyi Ma
author_facet Yibo Li
Ye Liu
Xiaoyi Ma
author_sort Yibo Li
collection DOAJ
description Accurate inversion of soil hydraulic parameters based on the van Genuchten–Mualem model has received much attention in soil science research. Herein, a hybrid algorithm method using particle swarm optimization and vector-evaluated genetic algorithm was used to invert the parameters <i>θ<sub>s</sub></i>, <i>α</i>, <i>n</i>, and <i>K<sub>s</sub></i>, with the objective functions of infiltration rate, cumulative infiltration, and soil water content. Then, numerical experiments were conducted on four typical soils at three initial water content levels (20, 40, and 60% effective saturation) to verify the accuracy of the inverse method. The results showed that the inversed soil water retention and conductivity curves were approximately the same as the real curves, with the root mean square errors of 0.00101–0.00192 cm<sup>3</sup>·cm<sup>−3</sup>, 0.00800–0.02519 cm<sup>3</sup>·cm<sup>−3</sup>, respectively, and both the Nash-Sutcliffe coefficients were approximately 1.0. Additionally, laboratory experiments were also performed to compare with the inversed parameters for verification, within small root mean squared errors and approximately 1.0 Nash–Sutcliffe coefficients. Furthermore, the method can also achieve acceptably accurate parameter inversion even with substantial measurement errors included in the cumulative infiltration, initial water content, and final water content. Thus, the method is effective and robust and found to be practical in field experiments.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T07:03:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-56902d9ec2914e47a7fe3aa2f003668c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4395
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T07:03:23Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj.art-56902d9ec2914e47a7fe3aa2f003668c2023-11-17T09:05:16ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952023-02-0113372610.3390/agronomy13030726Estimating Soil Hydraulic Parameters during Ponding Infiltration Using a Hybrid AlgorithmYibo Li0Ye Liu1Xiaoyi Ma2State Key Laboratory of Eco-Hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, ChinaCollege of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, ChinaCollege of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, ChinaAccurate inversion of soil hydraulic parameters based on the van Genuchten–Mualem model has received much attention in soil science research. Herein, a hybrid algorithm method using particle swarm optimization and vector-evaluated genetic algorithm was used to invert the parameters <i>θ<sub>s</sub></i>, <i>α</i>, <i>n</i>, and <i>K<sub>s</sub></i>, with the objective functions of infiltration rate, cumulative infiltration, and soil water content. Then, numerical experiments were conducted on four typical soils at three initial water content levels (20, 40, and 60% effective saturation) to verify the accuracy of the inverse method. The results showed that the inversed soil water retention and conductivity curves were approximately the same as the real curves, with the root mean square errors of 0.00101–0.00192 cm<sup>3</sup>·cm<sup>−3</sup>, 0.00800–0.02519 cm<sup>3</sup>·cm<sup>−3</sup>, respectively, and both the Nash-Sutcliffe coefficients were approximately 1.0. Additionally, laboratory experiments were also performed to compare with the inversed parameters for verification, within small root mean squared errors and approximately 1.0 Nash–Sutcliffe coefficients. Furthermore, the method can also achieve acceptably accurate parameter inversion even with substantial measurement errors included in the cumulative infiltration, initial water content, and final water content. Thus, the method is effective and robust and found to be practical in field experiments.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/3/726parameter estimationsoil hydraulic propertiesinverse modelingvector-evaluated genetic algorithmSWMS-2D
spellingShingle Yibo Li
Ye Liu
Xiaoyi Ma
Estimating Soil Hydraulic Parameters during Ponding Infiltration Using a Hybrid Algorithm
Agronomy
parameter estimation
soil hydraulic properties
inverse modeling
vector-evaluated genetic algorithm
SWMS-2D
title Estimating Soil Hydraulic Parameters during Ponding Infiltration Using a Hybrid Algorithm
title_full Estimating Soil Hydraulic Parameters during Ponding Infiltration Using a Hybrid Algorithm
title_fullStr Estimating Soil Hydraulic Parameters during Ponding Infiltration Using a Hybrid Algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Soil Hydraulic Parameters during Ponding Infiltration Using a Hybrid Algorithm
title_short Estimating Soil Hydraulic Parameters during Ponding Infiltration Using a Hybrid Algorithm
title_sort estimating soil hydraulic parameters during ponding infiltration using a hybrid algorithm
topic parameter estimation
soil hydraulic properties
inverse modeling
vector-evaluated genetic algorithm
SWMS-2D
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/3/726
work_keys_str_mv AT yiboli estimatingsoilhydraulicparametersduringpondinginfiltrationusingahybridalgorithm
AT yeliu estimatingsoilhydraulicparametersduringpondinginfiltrationusingahybridalgorithm
AT xiaoyima estimatingsoilhydraulicparametersduringpondinginfiltrationusingahybridalgorithm