Balancing the dilution and oddity effects: decisions depend on body size.
Grouping behaviour, common across the animal kingdom, is known to reduce an individual's risk of predation; particularly through dilution of individual risk and predator confusion (predator inability to single out an individual for attack). Theory predicts greater risk of predation to individua...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2011-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3130026?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1819091454040997888 |
|---|---|
| author | Gwendolen M Rodgers Jonathan R Ward Beth Askwith Lesley J Morrell |
| author_facet | Gwendolen M Rodgers Jonathan R Ward Beth Askwith Lesley J Morrell |
| author_sort | Gwendolen M Rodgers |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Grouping behaviour, common across the animal kingdom, is known to reduce an individual's risk of predation; particularly through dilution of individual risk and predator confusion (predator inability to single out an individual for attack). Theory predicts greater risk of predation to individuals more conspicuous to predators by difference in appearance from the group (the 'oddity' effect). Thus, animals should choose group mates close in appearance to themselves (eg. similar size), whilst also choosing a large group.We used the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata), a well known model species of group-living freshwater fish, in a series of binary choice trials investigating the outcome of conflict between preferences for large and phenotypically matched groups along a predation risk gradient. We found body-size dependent differences in the resultant social decisions. Large fish preferred shoaling with size-matched individuals, while small fish demonstrated no preference. There was a trend towards reduced preferences for the matched shoal under increased predation risk. Small fish were more active than large fish, moving between shoals more frequently. Activity levels increased as predation risk decreased. We found no effect of unmatched shoal size on preferences or activity.Our results suggest that predation risk and individual body size act together to influence shoaling decisions. Oddity was more important for large than small fish, reducing in importance at higher predation risks. Dilution was potentially of limited importance at these shoal sizes. Activity levels may relate to how much sampling of each shoal was needed by the test fish during decision making. Predation pressure may select for better decision makers to survive to larger size, or that older, larger fish have learned to make shoaling decisions more efficiently, and this, combined with their size relative to shoal-mates, and attractiveness as prey items influences shoaling decisions. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T22:39:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-569bdc02329e4927b893d3162cfc3960 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T22:39:58Z |
| publishDate | 2011-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-569bdc02329e4927b893d3162cfc39602022-12-21T18:47:52ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-0167e1481910.1371/journal.pone.0014819Balancing the dilution and oddity effects: decisions depend on body size.Gwendolen M RodgersJonathan R WardBeth AskwithLesley J MorrellGrouping behaviour, common across the animal kingdom, is known to reduce an individual's risk of predation; particularly through dilution of individual risk and predator confusion (predator inability to single out an individual for attack). Theory predicts greater risk of predation to individuals more conspicuous to predators by difference in appearance from the group (the 'oddity' effect). Thus, animals should choose group mates close in appearance to themselves (eg. similar size), whilst also choosing a large group.We used the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata), a well known model species of group-living freshwater fish, in a series of binary choice trials investigating the outcome of conflict between preferences for large and phenotypically matched groups along a predation risk gradient. We found body-size dependent differences in the resultant social decisions. Large fish preferred shoaling with size-matched individuals, while small fish demonstrated no preference. There was a trend towards reduced preferences for the matched shoal under increased predation risk. Small fish were more active than large fish, moving between shoals more frequently. Activity levels increased as predation risk decreased. We found no effect of unmatched shoal size on preferences or activity.Our results suggest that predation risk and individual body size act together to influence shoaling decisions. Oddity was more important for large than small fish, reducing in importance at higher predation risks. Dilution was potentially of limited importance at these shoal sizes. Activity levels may relate to how much sampling of each shoal was needed by the test fish during decision making. Predation pressure may select for better decision makers to survive to larger size, or that older, larger fish have learned to make shoaling decisions more efficiently, and this, combined with their size relative to shoal-mates, and attractiveness as prey items influences shoaling decisions.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3130026?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Gwendolen M Rodgers Jonathan R Ward Beth Askwith Lesley J Morrell Balancing the dilution and oddity effects: decisions depend on body size. PLoS ONE |
| title | Balancing the dilution and oddity effects: decisions depend on body size. |
| title_full | Balancing the dilution and oddity effects: decisions depend on body size. |
| title_fullStr | Balancing the dilution and oddity effects: decisions depend on body size. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Balancing the dilution and oddity effects: decisions depend on body size. |
| title_short | Balancing the dilution and oddity effects: decisions depend on body size. |
| title_sort | balancing the dilution and oddity effects decisions depend on body size |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3130026?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gwendolenmrodgers balancingthedilutionandoddityeffectsdecisionsdependonbodysize AT jonathanrward balancingthedilutionandoddityeffectsdecisionsdependonbodysize AT bethaskwith balancingthedilutionandoddityeffectsdecisionsdependonbodysize AT lesleyjmorrell balancingthedilutionandoddityeffectsdecisionsdependonbodysize |