Conservative Treatment for Acute Ankle Sprain: A Systematic Review

The aim was to identify conservative treatments available for acute ankle sprain and to evaluate their effectiveness with respect to pain relief and short-term recovery of functional capacity. A systematic review of the relevant literature was conducted via a data search of the PROSPERO, PubMed, Sco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana Belen Ortega-Avila, Pablo Cervera-Garvi, Ana Marchena-Rodriguez, Esther Chicharro-Luna, Christopher J. Nester, Chelsea Starbuck, Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/10/3128
_version_ 1797552415935823872
author Ana Belen Ortega-Avila
Pablo Cervera-Garvi
Ana Marchena-Rodriguez
Esther Chicharro-Luna
Christopher J. Nester
Chelsea Starbuck
Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron
author_facet Ana Belen Ortega-Avila
Pablo Cervera-Garvi
Ana Marchena-Rodriguez
Esther Chicharro-Luna
Christopher J. Nester
Chelsea Starbuck
Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron
author_sort Ana Belen Ortega-Avila
collection DOAJ
description The aim was to identify conservative treatments available for acute ankle sprain and to evaluate their effectiveness with respect to pain relief and short-term recovery of functional capacity. A systematic review of the relevant literature was conducted via a data search of the PROSPERO, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PyscINFO and SPORTDiscus databases, from inception until December 2019, focusing on randomised control trial studies. Two of the authors independently assessed the quality of each study located and extracted the relevant data. The quality of each paper was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool included in RevMan 5. In all, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. In terms of absence of bias, only nine papers were classed as “high quality”. Studies (75%) were of low quality in terms of the blinding of participants and personnel and uncertainty in blinding of outcome assessment and all presented one or more other forms of bias. Despite the generally low quality of the studies considered, it can be concluded that conservative treatment for acute ankle sprain normally achieves pain relief and rapidly improved functionality. Research based on higher-quality study designs and procedures would enable more definitive conclusions to be drawn.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T15:59:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-56ba379ddcb84a0ebe9273771b7d7bd2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T15:59:41Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-56ba379ddcb84a0ebe9273771b7d7bd22023-11-20T15:20:22ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832020-09-01910312810.3390/jcm9103128Conservative Treatment for Acute Ankle Sprain: A Systematic ReviewAna Belen Ortega-Avila0Pablo Cervera-Garvi1Ana Marchena-Rodriguez2Esther Chicharro-Luna3Christopher J. Nester4Chelsea Starbuck5Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron6Department of Nursing and Podiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, SpainDepartment of Nursing and Podiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, SpainDepartment of Nursing and Podiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, SpainDepartment of Behavioral and Health Sciences, Nursing Area, Faculty of Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, 03550 Alicante, SpainFaculty of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester M6 6PU, UKFaculty of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester M6 6PU, UKDepartment of Nursing and Podiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, SpainThe aim was to identify conservative treatments available for acute ankle sprain and to evaluate their effectiveness with respect to pain relief and short-term recovery of functional capacity. A systematic review of the relevant literature was conducted via a data search of the PROSPERO, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PyscINFO and SPORTDiscus databases, from inception until December 2019, focusing on randomised control trial studies. Two of the authors independently assessed the quality of each study located and extracted the relevant data. The quality of each paper was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool included in RevMan 5. In all, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. In terms of absence of bias, only nine papers were classed as “high quality”. Studies (75%) were of low quality in terms of the blinding of participants and personnel and uncertainty in blinding of outcome assessment and all presented one or more other forms of bias. Despite the generally low quality of the studies considered, it can be concluded that conservative treatment for acute ankle sprain normally achieves pain relief and rapidly improved functionality. Research based on higher-quality study designs and procedures would enable more definitive conclusions to be drawn.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/10/3128ankle sprainconservative treatmentsystematic reviewpainfunction
spellingShingle Ana Belen Ortega-Avila
Pablo Cervera-Garvi
Ana Marchena-Rodriguez
Esther Chicharro-Luna
Christopher J. Nester
Chelsea Starbuck
Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron
Conservative Treatment for Acute Ankle Sprain: A Systematic Review
Journal of Clinical Medicine
ankle sprain
conservative treatment
systematic review
pain
function
title Conservative Treatment for Acute Ankle Sprain: A Systematic Review
title_full Conservative Treatment for Acute Ankle Sprain: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Conservative Treatment for Acute Ankle Sprain: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Conservative Treatment for Acute Ankle Sprain: A Systematic Review
title_short Conservative Treatment for Acute Ankle Sprain: A Systematic Review
title_sort conservative treatment for acute ankle sprain a systematic review
topic ankle sprain
conservative treatment
systematic review
pain
function
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/10/3128
work_keys_str_mv AT anabelenortegaavila conservativetreatmentforacuteanklesprainasystematicreview
AT pablocerveragarvi conservativetreatmentforacuteanklesprainasystematicreview
AT anamarchenarodriguez conservativetreatmentforacuteanklesprainasystematicreview
AT estherchicharroluna conservativetreatmentforacuteanklesprainasystematicreview
AT christopherjnester conservativetreatmentforacuteanklesprainasystematicreview
AT chelseastarbuck conservativetreatmentforacuteanklesprainasystematicreview
AT gabrielgijonnogueron conservativetreatmentforacuteanklesprainasystematicreview