Unfulfilled farmer expectations: the case of the Insect Resistant Maize for Africa (IRMA) project in Kenya

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Maize is the most important staple food in Kenya; any reduction in production and yield therefore often becomes a national food security concern. To address the challenge posed by the maize stem borer, the Insect Resistant Maize for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mabeya Justin, Ezezika Obidimma C
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-11-01
Series:Agriculture & Food Security
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.agricultureandfoodsecurity.com/content/1/S1/S6
_version_ 1811223728844963840
author Mabeya Justin
Ezezika Obidimma C
author_facet Mabeya Justin
Ezezika Obidimma C
author_sort Mabeya Justin
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Maize is the most important staple food in Kenya; any reduction in production and yield therefore often becomes a national food security concern. To address the challenge posed by the maize stem borer, the Insect Resistant Maize for Africa (IRMA) agricultural biotechnology public-private partnership (PPP) project was launched in 1999. There were, however, pre-existing concerns regarding the use of genetic engineering in crop production and skepticism about private sector involvement. The purpose of this case study was to understand the role of trust in the IRMA partnership by identifying the challenges to, and practices for, building trust in the project.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Data were collected by conducting face-to-face, semi-structured interviews; reviewing publicly available project documents; and direct observations. The data were analyzed to generate recurring and emergent themes on how trust is understood and built among the partners in the IRMA project and between the project and the community.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Clear and continued communication with stakeholders is of paramount importance to building trust, especially regarding competition among partners about project management positions; a lack of clarity on ownership of intellectual property rights (IPRs); and the influence of anti-genetic modification (GM) organizations. Awareness creation about IRMA’s anticipated products raised the end users’ expectations, which were unfulfilled due to failure to deliver <it>Bacillus thuringiensis</it> (Bt)-based products, thereby leading to diminished trust between the project and the community.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Four key issues have been identified from the results of the study. First, the inability to deliver the intended products to the end user diminished stakeholders’ trust and interest in the project. Second, full and honest disclosure of information by partners when entering into project agreements is crucial to ensuring progress in a project. Third, engaging stakeholders and creating awareness immediately at the project’s inception contributes to trust building. Fourth, public sector goodwill combined with private sector technology and skills are necessary for a successful partnership. These findings may serve as a useful guide for building and fostering trust among partners in other agbiotech PPPs in sub-Saharan Africa.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-12T08:38:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-56c3d7d0e48f4eceafec369b224674f4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2048-7010
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T08:38:33Z
publishDate 2012-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Agriculture & Food Security
spelling doaj.art-56c3d7d0e48f4eceafec369b224674f42022-12-22T03:39:58ZengBMCAgriculture & Food Security2048-70102012-11-011Suppl 1S610.1186/2048-7010-1-S1-S6Unfulfilled farmer expectations: the case of the Insect Resistant Maize for Africa (IRMA) project in KenyaMabeya JustinEzezika Obidimma C<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Maize is the most important staple food in Kenya; any reduction in production and yield therefore often becomes a national food security concern. To address the challenge posed by the maize stem borer, the Insect Resistant Maize for Africa (IRMA) agricultural biotechnology public-private partnership (PPP) project was launched in 1999. There were, however, pre-existing concerns regarding the use of genetic engineering in crop production and skepticism about private sector involvement. The purpose of this case study was to understand the role of trust in the IRMA partnership by identifying the challenges to, and practices for, building trust in the project.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Data were collected by conducting face-to-face, semi-structured interviews; reviewing publicly available project documents; and direct observations. The data were analyzed to generate recurring and emergent themes on how trust is understood and built among the partners in the IRMA project and between the project and the community.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Clear and continued communication with stakeholders is of paramount importance to building trust, especially regarding competition among partners about project management positions; a lack of clarity on ownership of intellectual property rights (IPRs); and the influence of anti-genetic modification (GM) organizations. Awareness creation about IRMA’s anticipated products raised the end users’ expectations, which were unfulfilled due to failure to deliver <it>Bacillus thuringiensis</it> (Bt)-based products, thereby leading to diminished trust between the project and the community.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Four key issues have been identified from the results of the study. First, the inability to deliver the intended products to the end user diminished stakeholders’ trust and interest in the project. Second, full and honest disclosure of information by partners when entering into project agreements is crucial to ensuring progress in a project. Third, engaging stakeholders and creating awareness immediately at the project’s inception contributes to trust building. Fourth, public sector goodwill combined with private sector technology and skills are necessary for a successful partnership. These findings may serve as a useful guide for building and fostering trust among partners in other agbiotech PPPs in sub-Saharan Africa.</p>http://www.agricultureandfoodsecurity.com/content/1/S1/S6Insect Resistant Maize for Africa (IRMA)trustpublic-private partnershipBt maizeagricultural biotechnologyKenya
spellingShingle Mabeya Justin
Ezezika Obidimma C
Unfulfilled farmer expectations: the case of the Insect Resistant Maize for Africa (IRMA) project in Kenya
Agriculture & Food Security
Insect Resistant Maize for Africa (IRMA)
trust
public-private partnership
Bt maize
agricultural biotechnology
Kenya
title Unfulfilled farmer expectations: the case of the Insect Resistant Maize for Africa (IRMA) project in Kenya
title_full Unfulfilled farmer expectations: the case of the Insect Resistant Maize for Africa (IRMA) project in Kenya
title_fullStr Unfulfilled farmer expectations: the case of the Insect Resistant Maize for Africa (IRMA) project in Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Unfulfilled farmer expectations: the case of the Insect Resistant Maize for Africa (IRMA) project in Kenya
title_short Unfulfilled farmer expectations: the case of the Insect Resistant Maize for Africa (IRMA) project in Kenya
title_sort unfulfilled farmer expectations the case of the insect resistant maize for africa irma project in kenya
topic Insect Resistant Maize for Africa (IRMA)
trust
public-private partnership
Bt maize
agricultural biotechnology
Kenya
url http://www.agricultureandfoodsecurity.com/content/1/S1/S6
work_keys_str_mv AT mabeyajustin unfulfilledfarmerexpectationsthecaseoftheinsectresistantmaizeforafricairmaprojectinkenya
AT ezezikaobidimmac unfulfilledfarmerexpectationsthecaseoftheinsectresistantmaizeforafricairmaprojectinkenya