Determination of Major Components in Rock Salt by X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry with Sample Fusion

The lack of reference materials, and chlorine loss are two of the problems that need to be solved in order to aid the determination of major components in rock salt by X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry. It is important to select an appropriate sample pretreatment method to ensure reproducibility and i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Li Ke-ji
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Science Press, PR China 2016-05-01
Series:Yankuang ceshi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/en/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2016.03.012
_version_ 1811168464297000960
author Li Ke-ji
author_facet Li Ke-ji
author_sort Li Ke-ji
collection DOAJ
description The lack of reference materials, and chlorine loss are two of the problems that need to be solved in order to aid the determination of major components in rock salt by X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry. It is important to select an appropriate sample pretreatment method to ensure reproducibility and it has been demonstrated that sodium chloride, calcium sulfate and other components in synthetic calibration materials for the pressed pellets method show a tendency of diffusion towards the pellet surface when samples are exposed to X-ray irradiation. Moreover, the decomposition of sodium chloride makes it difficult to obtain a stable calibration curve. The fusion bead method, however, does not exhibit these problems. In the study documented in this paper, samples were prepared by the fusion method. Synthetic calibration materials used for standard curve establishment were prepared by mixing spectrum pure salts/oxides with sediment/soil reference materials. 0.6 g of sample was fused by 10 g of mixing flux of lithium tetraborate and lithium metaborate (12:22) at 1000℃ for 300 s pre-fusion and for another 300 s fusion, followed by 30 s standing. The resulting glass disk was flat and transparent. No extra release agent was added because the samples contained chlorine. Analytical results of the major components in salt rock yielded a precision of less than 1.5% (relative standard deviation). This method shortens the analysis time and reduces the reagent consumption compared with the traditional method, which is an alternative method for analyzing major components in salt rock.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T16:27:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-56cf64ea3ae840658ae37f881a2608bb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0254-5357
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T16:27:54Z
publishDate 2016-05-01
publisher Science Press, PR China
record_format Article
series Yankuang ceshi
spelling doaj.art-56cf64ea3ae840658ae37f881a2608bb2023-02-09T01:26:03ZengScience Press, PR ChinaYankuang ceshi0254-53572016-05-0135329029410.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2016.03.012ykcs-35-3-290Determination of Major Components in Rock Salt by X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry with Sample FusionLi Ke-ji0Institute of Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Chengdu 610041, ChinaThe lack of reference materials, and chlorine loss are two of the problems that need to be solved in order to aid the determination of major components in rock salt by X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry. It is important to select an appropriate sample pretreatment method to ensure reproducibility and it has been demonstrated that sodium chloride, calcium sulfate and other components in synthetic calibration materials for the pressed pellets method show a tendency of diffusion towards the pellet surface when samples are exposed to X-ray irradiation. Moreover, the decomposition of sodium chloride makes it difficult to obtain a stable calibration curve. The fusion bead method, however, does not exhibit these problems. In the study documented in this paper, samples were prepared by the fusion method. Synthetic calibration materials used for standard curve establishment were prepared by mixing spectrum pure salts/oxides with sediment/soil reference materials. 0.6 g of sample was fused by 10 g of mixing flux of lithium tetraborate and lithium metaborate (12:22) at 1000℃ for 300 s pre-fusion and for another 300 s fusion, followed by 30 s standing. The resulting glass disk was flat and transparent. No extra release agent was added because the samples contained chlorine. Analytical results of the major components in salt rock yielded a precision of less than 1.5% (relative standard deviation). This method shortens the analysis time and reduces the reagent consumption compared with the traditional method, which is an alternative method for analyzing major components in salt rock.http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/en/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2016.03.012rock saltmajor componentsfusion samplingchlorine release agentx-ray fluorescence spectrometry
spellingShingle Li Ke-ji
Determination of Major Components in Rock Salt by X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry with Sample Fusion
Yankuang ceshi
rock salt
major components
fusion sampling
chlorine release agent
x-ray fluorescence spectrometry
title Determination of Major Components in Rock Salt by X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry with Sample Fusion
title_full Determination of Major Components in Rock Salt by X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry with Sample Fusion
title_fullStr Determination of Major Components in Rock Salt by X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry with Sample Fusion
title_full_unstemmed Determination of Major Components in Rock Salt by X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry with Sample Fusion
title_short Determination of Major Components in Rock Salt by X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry with Sample Fusion
title_sort determination of major components in rock salt by x ray fluorescence spectrometry with sample fusion
topic rock salt
major components
fusion sampling
chlorine release agent
x-ray fluorescence spectrometry
url http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/en/article/doi/10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.2016.03.012
work_keys_str_mv AT likeji determinationofmajorcomponentsinrocksaltbyxrayfluorescencespectrometrywithsamplefusion