Investigation of reward effects in overlapping dual-task situations

In dual-task (DT) situations, performance in reaction time and error rates decrease compared with single-task situations. These performance decrements are usually explained with the serial processing at the response selection stage constituting a bottleneck. Evidence for this assumption stems from t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leif E. Langsdorf, Sebastian Kübler, Torsten Schubert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-02-01
Series:Acta Psychologica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691821002158
_version_ 1828145869504905216
author Leif E. Langsdorf
Sebastian Kübler
Torsten Schubert
author_facet Leif E. Langsdorf
Sebastian Kübler
Torsten Schubert
author_sort Leif E. Langsdorf
collection DOAJ
description In dual-task (DT) situations, performance in reaction time and error rates decrease compared with single-task situations. These performance decrements are usually explained with the serial processing at the response selection stage constituting a bottleneck. Evidence for this assumption stems from the observation that response times for the second task (task 2; RT 2) increase with decreasing stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA). In this study, we investigated the effect of reward on bottleneck processing in DTs. In Experiment 1, we addressed two questions. First, does reward provided for task 2 performance affect task 2 performance, or does it affect task 1 performance? To conclude whether reward affected task 2 or task 1 performance, we relied on the psychological refractory period paradigm (PRP) as a chronometric tool. Second, we asked for the locus of the reward effect within the DT stream. We demonstrated shorter RTs in task 1 in a rewarded compared with an un-rewarded condition indicating reward affected task 1 processing. Furthermore, this reward effect is propagated onto task 2 at short SOA suggesting that the locus of the reward effect can be pinpointed before or at the bottleneck of task 1. In Experiment 2, we tested for the locus of the effect propagation onto task 2. To this end, we implemented an additional difficulty manipulation of the response selection of task 2 and found that the reward effect is propagated from task 1 onto the response selection stage of task 2.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:38:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-56d08d3841e44c70949a918589a6d3b0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0001-6918
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:38:50Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Acta Psychologica
spelling doaj.art-56d08d3841e44c70949a918589a6d3b02022-12-22T04:04:16ZengElsevierActa Psychologica0001-69182022-02-01222103465Investigation of reward effects in overlapping dual-task situationsLeif E. Langsdorf0Sebastian Kübler1Torsten Schubert2Department of Psychology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Corresponding authors at: Department of Psychology, Martin-Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.Department of Psychology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; Corresponding authors at: Department of Psychology, Martin-Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.In dual-task (DT) situations, performance in reaction time and error rates decrease compared with single-task situations. These performance decrements are usually explained with the serial processing at the response selection stage constituting a bottleneck. Evidence for this assumption stems from the observation that response times for the second task (task 2; RT 2) increase with decreasing stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA). In this study, we investigated the effect of reward on bottleneck processing in DTs. In Experiment 1, we addressed two questions. First, does reward provided for task 2 performance affect task 2 performance, or does it affect task 1 performance? To conclude whether reward affected task 2 or task 1 performance, we relied on the psychological refractory period paradigm (PRP) as a chronometric tool. Second, we asked for the locus of the reward effect within the DT stream. We demonstrated shorter RTs in task 1 in a rewarded compared with an un-rewarded condition indicating reward affected task 1 processing. Furthermore, this reward effect is propagated onto task 2 at short SOA suggesting that the locus of the reward effect can be pinpointed before or at the bottleneck of task 1. In Experiment 2, we tested for the locus of the effect propagation onto task 2. To this end, we implemented an additional difficulty manipulation of the response selection of task 2 and found that the reward effect is propagated from task 1 onto the response selection stage of task 2.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691821002158Dual taskingMultitaskingMotivationRewardLocus of slack
spellingShingle Leif E. Langsdorf
Sebastian Kübler
Torsten Schubert
Investigation of reward effects in overlapping dual-task situations
Acta Psychologica
Dual tasking
Multitasking
Motivation
Reward
Locus of slack
title Investigation of reward effects in overlapping dual-task situations
title_full Investigation of reward effects in overlapping dual-task situations
title_fullStr Investigation of reward effects in overlapping dual-task situations
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of reward effects in overlapping dual-task situations
title_short Investigation of reward effects in overlapping dual-task situations
title_sort investigation of reward effects in overlapping dual task situations
topic Dual tasking
Multitasking
Motivation
Reward
Locus of slack
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691821002158
work_keys_str_mv AT leifelangsdorf investigationofrewardeffectsinoverlappingdualtasksituations
AT sebastiankubler investigationofrewardeffectsinoverlappingdualtasksituations
AT torstenschubert investigationofrewardeffectsinoverlappingdualtasksituations