Optimization of energy and time predicts dynamic speeds for human walking

Humans make a number of choices when they walk, such as how fast and for how long. The preferred steady walking speed seems chosen to minimize energy expenditure per distance traveled. But the speed of actual walking bouts is not only steady, but rather a time-varying trajectory, which can also be m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rebecca Elizabeth Carlisle, Arthur D Kuo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2023-02-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/81939
_version_ 1797866228312702976
author Rebecca Elizabeth Carlisle
Arthur D Kuo
author_facet Rebecca Elizabeth Carlisle
Arthur D Kuo
author_sort Rebecca Elizabeth Carlisle
collection DOAJ
description Humans make a number of choices when they walk, such as how fast and for how long. The preferred steady walking speed seems chosen to minimize energy expenditure per distance traveled. But the speed of actual walking bouts is not only steady, but rather a time-varying trajectory, which can also be modulated by task urgency or an individual’s movement vigor. Here we show that speed trajectories and durations of human walking bouts are explained better by an objective to minimize Energy and Time, meaning the total work or energy to reach destination, plus a cost proportional to bout duration. Applied to a computational model of walking dynamics, this objective predicts dynamic speed vs. time trajectories with inverted U shapes. Model and human experiment (N=10) show that shorter bouts are unsteady and dominated by the time and effort of accelerating, and longer ones are steadier and faster and dominated by steady-state time and effort. Individual-dependent vigor may be characterized by the energy one is willing to spend to save a unit of time, which explains why some may walk faster than others, but everyone may have similar-shaped trajectories due to similar walking dynamics. Tradeoffs between energy and time costs can predict transient, steady, and vigor-related aspects of walking.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T23:21:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-56d9aff8f3e54d5abe458d49356dc903
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-084X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T23:21:41Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
record_format Article
series eLife
spelling doaj.art-56d9aff8f3e54d5abe458d49356dc9032023-03-21T16:37:42ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2023-02-011210.7554/eLife.81939Optimization of energy and time predicts dynamic speeds for human walkingRebecca Elizabeth Carlisle0Arthur D Kuo1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5233-9709Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, CanadaBiomedical Engineering Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, CanadaHumans make a number of choices when they walk, such as how fast and for how long. The preferred steady walking speed seems chosen to minimize energy expenditure per distance traveled. But the speed of actual walking bouts is not only steady, but rather a time-varying trajectory, which can also be modulated by task urgency or an individual’s movement vigor. Here we show that speed trajectories and durations of human walking bouts are explained better by an objective to minimize Energy and Time, meaning the total work or energy to reach destination, plus a cost proportional to bout duration. Applied to a computational model of walking dynamics, this objective predicts dynamic speed vs. time trajectories with inverted U shapes. Model and human experiment (N=10) show that shorter bouts are unsteady and dominated by the time and effort of accelerating, and longer ones are steadier and faster and dominated by steady-state time and effort. Individual-dependent vigor may be characterized by the energy one is willing to spend to save a unit of time, which explains why some may walk faster than others, but everyone may have similar-shaped trajectories due to similar walking dynamics. Tradeoffs between energy and time costs can predict transient, steady, and vigor-related aspects of walking.https://elifesciences.org/articles/81939biomechanicshuman physiologymetabolic costlocomotionneural controloptimal control
spellingShingle Rebecca Elizabeth Carlisle
Arthur D Kuo
Optimization of energy and time predicts dynamic speeds for human walking
eLife
biomechanics
human physiology
metabolic cost
locomotion
neural control
optimal control
title Optimization of energy and time predicts dynamic speeds for human walking
title_full Optimization of energy and time predicts dynamic speeds for human walking
title_fullStr Optimization of energy and time predicts dynamic speeds for human walking
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of energy and time predicts dynamic speeds for human walking
title_short Optimization of energy and time predicts dynamic speeds for human walking
title_sort optimization of energy and time predicts dynamic speeds for human walking
topic biomechanics
human physiology
metabolic cost
locomotion
neural control
optimal control
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/81939
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeccaelizabethcarlisle optimizationofenergyandtimepredictsdynamicspeedsforhumanwalking
AT arthurdkuo optimizationofenergyandtimepredictsdynamicspeedsforhumanwalking