Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories
An important epistemological problem has been faced by Exercise Physiologists. On one hand, one theory explains the fatigue through a ceiling effect of oxygen uptake. On the other hand, the new theory proposes that an encephalon mechanism would stop the effort before a catastrophic homeostasis failu...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
2022-03-01
|
Series: | Sports Medicine and Health Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337621000627 |
_version_ | 1818307809894203392 |
---|---|
author | Fernando A.M.S. Pompeu |
author_facet | Fernando A.M.S. Pompeu |
author_sort | Fernando A.M.S. Pompeu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | An important epistemological problem has been faced by Exercise Physiologists. On one hand, one theory explains the fatigue through a ceiling effect of oxygen uptake. On the other hand, the new theory proposes that an encephalon mechanism would stop the effort before a catastrophic homeostasis failure. Many physiologists have looked for evidence to support their favourite theory even though the induction logic problem does not allow to prove whether truth is discovered; however, it is possible to prove that it does not occur. When some researchers fail to test their hypotheses, they use relativism to bring up their theories again. Noakes and his colleagues have based their theory on relativism, because it is impossible to refute by empirical observation. It also doesn't explain all phenomena that the oldest Hill's theory is able to explain. Noakes's theory isn't more accurate in its previsions. Noakes did not check whether the oxygen uptake plateau occurs in suitable tests to measure on the mouth what happens in the muscles. Finally, it doesn't propose new tests for the encephalon role during maximal effort, as that is expected in scientific work. For all of these reasons, it is possible to conclude there are no advantages in switching to the “Central Governor” theory. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-13T07:04:17Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-56e3055d2105431b90b8c347f40e4b0b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2666-3376 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-13T07:04:17Z |
publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
publisher | KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. |
record_format | Article |
series | Sports Medicine and Health Science |
spelling | doaj.art-56e3055d2105431b90b8c347f40e4b0b2022-12-21T23:55:51ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Sports Medicine and Health Science2666-33762022-03-014117Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theoriesFernando A.M.S. Pompeu0The Physical Education Graduate Program, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, BrazilAn important epistemological problem has been faced by Exercise Physiologists. On one hand, one theory explains the fatigue through a ceiling effect of oxygen uptake. On the other hand, the new theory proposes that an encephalon mechanism would stop the effort before a catastrophic homeostasis failure. Many physiologists have looked for evidence to support their favourite theory even though the induction logic problem does not allow to prove whether truth is discovered; however, it is possible to prove that it does not occur. When some researchers fail to test their hypotheses, they use relativism to bring up their theories again. Noakes and his colleagues have based their theory on relativism, because it is impossible to refute by empirical observation. It also doesn't explain all phenomena that the oldest Hill's theory is able to explain. Noakes's theory isn't more accurate in its previsions. Noakes did not check whether the oxygen uptake plateau occurs in suitable tests to measure on the mouth what happens in the muscles. Finally, it doesn't propose new tests for the encephalon role during maximal effort, as that is expected in scientific work. For all of these reasons, it is possible to conclude there are no advantages in switching to the “Central Governor” theory.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337621000627Epistemological problemV̇O2 plateauPositivismScientific revolutions and philosophy of science |
spellingShingle | Fernando A.M.S. Pompeu Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories Sports Medicine and Health Science Epistemological problem V̇O2 plateau Positivism Scientific revolutions and philosophy of science |
title | Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories |
title_full | Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories |
title_fullStr | Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories |
title_full_unstemmed | Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories |
title_short | Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories |
title_sort | why pheidippides could not believe in the central governor model popper s philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories |
topic | Epistemological problem V̇O2 plateau Positivism Scientific revolutions and philosophy of science |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337621000627 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fernandoamspompeu whypheidippidescouldnotbelieveinthecentralgovernormodelpoppersphilosophyappliedtochoosebetweentwoexercisephysiologytheories |