Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories

An important epistemological problem has been faced by Exercise Physiologists. On one hand, one theory explains the fatigue through a ceiling effect of oxygen uptake. On the other hand, the new theory proposes that an encephalon mechanism would stop the effort before a catastrophic homeostasis failu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fernando A.M.S. Pompeu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2022-03-01
Series:Sports Medicine and Health Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337621000627
_version_ 1818307809894203392
author Fernando A.M.S. Pompeu
author_facet Fernando A.M.S. Pompeu
author_sort Fernando A.M.S. Pompeu
collection DOAJ
description An important epistemological problem has been faced by Exercise Physiologists. On one hand, one theory explains the fatigue through a ceiling effect of oxygen uptake. On the other hand, the new theory proposes that an encephalon mechanism would stop the effort before a catastrophic homeostasis failure. Many physiologists have looked for evidence to support their favourite theory even though the induction logic problem does not allow to prove whether truth is discovered; however, it is possible to prove that it does not occur. When some researchers fail to test their hypotheses, they use relativism to bring up their theories again. Noakes and his colleagues have based their theory on relativism, because it is impossible to refute by empirical observation. It also doesn't explain all phenomena that the oldest Hill's theory is able to explain. Noakes's theory isn't more accurate in its previsions. Noakes did not check whether the oxygen uptake plateau occurs in suitable tests to measure on the mouth what happens in the muscles. Finally, it doesn't propose new tests for the encephalon role during maximal effort, as that is expected in scientific work. For all of these reasons, it is possible to conclude there are no advantages in switching to the “Central Governor” theory.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T07:04:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-56e3055d2105431b90b8c347f40e4b0b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-3376
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T07:04:17Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
record_format Article
series Sports Medicine and Health Science
spelling doaj.art-56e3055d2105431b90b8c347f40e4b0b2022-12-21T23:55:51ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Sports Medicine and Health Science2666-33762022-03-014117Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theoriesFernando A.M.S. Pompeu0The Physical Education Graduate Program, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, BrazilAn important epistemological problem has been faced by Exercise Physiologists. On one hand, one theory explains the fatigue through a ceiling effect of oxygen uptake. On the other hand, the new theory proposes that an encephalon mechanism would stop the effort before a catastrophic homeostasis failure. Many physiologists have looked for evidence to support their favourite theory even though the induction logic problem does not allow to prove whether truth is discovered; however, it is possible to prove that it does not occur. When some researchers fail to test their hypotheses, they use relativism to bring up their theories again. Noakes and his colleagues have based their theory on relativism, because it is impossible to refute by empirical observation. It also doesn't explain all phenomena that the oldest Hill's theory is able to explain. Noakes's theory isn't more accurate in its previsions. Noakes did not check whether the oxygen uptake plateau occurs in suitable tests to measure on the mouth what happens in the muscles. Finally, it doesn't propose new tests for the encephalon role during maximal effort, as that is expected in scientific work. For all of these reasons, it is possible to conclude there are no advantages in switching to the “Central Governor” theory.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337621000627Epistemological problemV̇O2 plateauPositivismScientific revolutions and philosophy of science
spellingShingle Fernando A.M.S. Pompeu
Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories
Sports Medicine and Health Science
Epistemological problem
V̇O2 plateau
Positivism
Scientific revolutions and philosophy of science
title Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories
title_full Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories
title_fullStr Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories
title_full_unstemmed Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories
title_short Why Pheidippides could not believe in the ‘Central Governor Model’: Popper's philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories
title_sort why pheidippides could not believe in the central governor model popper s philosophy applied to choose between two exercise physiology theories
topic Epistemological problem
V̇O2 plateau
Positivism
Scientific revolutions and philosophy of science
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337621000627
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandoamspompeu whypheidippidescouldnotbelieveinthecentralgovernormodelpoppersphilosophyappliedtochoosebetweentwoexercisephysiologytheories