Effects of astigmatic defocus on binocular contrast sensitivity.

PURPOSE:To determine the effects of astigmatism on contrast sensitivity (CS). METHODS:Eighteen normal volunteers (30.5 ± 6.0 [mean ± SD] years) were recruited. After correcting each refractive error by spectacles, against-the-rule (ATR) or with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism of +1.00, +2.00 and +3.00 D...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yumi Hasegawa, Takahiro Hiraoka, Shinichiro Nakano, Fumiki Okamoto, Tetsuro Oshika
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6091947?pdf=render
_version_ 1818576869935546368
author Yumi Hasegawa
Takahiro Hiraoka
Shinichiro Nakano
Fumiki Okamoto
Tetsuro Oshika
author_facet Yumi Hasegawa
Takahiro Hiraoka
Shinichiro Nakano
Fumiki Okamoto
Tetsuro Oshika
author_sort Yumi Hasegawa
collection DOAJ
description PURPOSE:To determine the effects of astigmatism on contrast sensitivity (CS). METHODS:Eighteen normal volunteers (30.5 ± 6.0 [mean ± SD] years) were recruited. After correcting each refractive error by spectacles, against-the-rule (ATR) or with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism of +1.00, +2.00 and +3.00 D was intentionally produced in both eyes, and then binocular CS was measured. The cylindrical addition of different powers (+1.00-+3.00 D) was compensated with spherical lenses so that the spherical equivalent refraction became zero in each eye. Subsequently, the above cylindrical addition was monocularly induced, and binocular CS was measured again. The relation between CS and astigmatic power, axis, and monocular or binocular astigmatism was investigated. RESULTS:With binocular ATR and WTR astigmatism, increases in astigmatic power significantly correlated with decreases in the area under the log contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF). With monocular astigmatic defocus, astigmatic power addition did not affect AULCSF. With binocular astigmatic defocus of high-power (+2.00 and +3.00 D), ATR astigmatism deteriorated AULCSF more than WTR astigmatism. In a comparison between binocular and monocular astigmatic defocus, CS was significantly worse with binocular astigmatic defocus than with monocular astigmatic defocus at higher spatial frequencies regardless of astigmatic power. CONCLUSIONS:Binocular astigmatic defocus deteriorates CS depending on the amount of astigmatic power. ATR astigmatism reduces CS more than WTR astigmatism dose. In addition, binocular astigmatic defocus affects CS more severely than monocular astigmatic defocus especially at high spatial frequencies.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T06:20:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-56fa751a410a4b9385969583633373f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T06:20:53Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-56fa751a410a4b9385969583633373f82022-12-21T22:41:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01138e020234010.1371/journal.pone.0202340Effects of astigmatic defocus on binocular contrast sensitivity.Yumi HasegawaTakahiro HiraokaShinichiro NakanoFumiki OkamotoTetsuro OshikaPURPOSE:To determine the effects of astigmatism on contrast sensitivity (CS). METHODS:Eighteen normal volunteers (30.5 ± 6.0 [mean ± SD] years) were recruited. After correcting each refractive error by spectacles, against-the-rule (ATR) or with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism of +1.00, +2.00 and +3.00 D was intentionally produced in both eyes, and then binocular CS was measured. The cylindrical addition of different powers (+1.00-+3.00 D) was compensated with spherical lenses so that the spherical equivalent refraction became zero in each eye. Subsequently, the above cylindrical addition was monocularly induced, and binocular CS was measured again. The relation between CS and astigmatic power, axis, and monocular or binocular astigmatism was investigated. RESULTS:With binocular ATR and WTR astigmatism, increases in astigmatic power significantly correlated with decreases in the area under the log contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF). With monocular astigmatic defocus, astigmatic power addition did not affect AULCSF. With binocular astigmatic defocus of high-power (+2.00 and +3.00 D), ATR astigmatism deteriorated AULCSF more than WTR astigmatism. In a comparison between binocular and monocular astigmatic defocus, CS was significantly worse with binocular astigmatic defocus than with monocular astigmatic defocus at higher spatial frequencies regardless of astigmatic power. CONCLUSIONS:Binocular astigmatic defocus deteriorates CS depending on the amount of astigmatic power. ATR astigmatism reduces CS more than WTR astigmatism dose. In addition, binocular astigmatic defocus affects CS more severely than monocular astigmatic defocus especially at high spatial frequencies.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6091947?pdf=render
spellingShingle Yumi Hasegawa
Takahiro Hiraoka
Shinichiro Nakano
Fumiki Okamoto
Tetsuro Oshika
Effects of astigmatic defocus on binocular contrast sensitivity.
PLoS ONE
title Effects of astigmatic defocus on binocular contrast sensitivity.
title_full Effects of astigmatic defocus on binocular contrast sensitivity.
title_fullStr Effects of astigmatic defocus on binocular contrast sensitivity.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of astigmatic defocus on binocular contrast sensitivity.
title_short Effects of astigmatic defocus on binocular contrast sensitivity.
title_sort effects of astigmatic defocus on binocular contrast sensitivity
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6091947?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT yumihasegawa effectsofastigmaticdefocusonbinocularcontrastsensitivity
AT takahirohiraoka effectsofastigmaticdefocusonbinocularcontrastsensitivity
AT shinichironakano effectsofastigmaticdefocusonbinocularcontrastsensitivity
AT fumikiokamoto effectsofastigmaticdefocusonbinocularcontrastsensitivity
AT tetsurooshika effectsofastigmaticdefocusonbinocularcontrastsensitivity